WTF??? Vote count rigged!!!

page: 3
13
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 3 2012 @ 09:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by taws6
this is such bull$h1t, a blonde reporter on CNN was interviewing a young soldier saying that if Ron Paul wins it will be dangerous because he will pull troops out of a lot of the countries. The young soldier started saying that it will be more dangerous if we start nitpicking wars with countries like Iraq and that's where CNN cut him off and said they are having technical difficulties. Anyone else see this ? This type of sh...crap annoys me


Just in case anyone is wondering, this is what I referring to





posted on Jan, 3 2012 @ 09:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Changetwothousandtwelve
 


Well now,shouldn't you wait till you can prove it before starting a thread?And yes, I realize you didn't start the thread.



posted on Jan, 3 2012 @ 10:09 PM
link   
reply to post by taws6
 


This type of occurance is NOT coincidental.

The MSM has a vested interest in molding and shaping the sheep's views to fit what they want. It has become so obvious to a prudent observer that I no longer trust ANYTHING from any large corporate news outlet.



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 03:54 AM
link   
there's only so much cheating they can do or else the run the risk of completely exposing them selves , so we can asume RP is being safted out of many votes .



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 04:03 AM
link   
Personally, I think someone has a case of Paranoia.

The "WTF" in the name of the thread also contributes to my theory, however if it did occur then it's human error.



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 04:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by Indenu
Personally, I think someone has a case of Paranoia.

The "WTF" in the name of the thread also contributes to my theory, however if it did occur then it's human error.





Are you for real? I am sorry but when I read you reply I could not help but think about paid posters here on ATS. Maybe I am also paranoid?



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 07:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by Indenu
Personally, I think someone has a case of Paranoia.

The "WTF" in the name of the thread also contributes to my theory, however if it did occur then it's human error.

And you must have a condition called delusion if you think the voting system isn't as corrupt as the day is long.

Political leaders have already been chosen and have been/are being groomed for the job for years before they are . .. (ahem) .. 'voted' in.

It makes no difference at all who the public vote for, TPTB will always make sure THEIR man gets in. The public vote is just a huge, well choreographed sham to make you think you choose your own leader.
edit on 4-1-2012 by doobydoll because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 08:07 AM
link   
I bet you every penny in my pocket the numbers aren't what they say they are. Ron Paul in lead all night suddenly at close out he takes 3rd? TPTB just wanted to make the vote look legit so they let their man Romney in the lead and didn't make it look so bad for Paul for coming in 3rd....

Even if these are legit numbers they had people their to sway undecided voters against paul alll night I watched it all on C span, eventhough he RP still had the most followers their and most callers with positive things to say about him.... It's whatever though I have accepted America has lost already and you guys know this voting system isn't decided by the American people anymore.....
edit on 4-1-2012 by jheated5 because: (no reason given)
edit on 4-1-2012 by jheated5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 08:12 AM
link   
reply to post by daaskapital
 


Oh lord, I said this was going to happen and I got nothing but hate mail. Ron Paul would not be allowed to win, he will never be allowed to win. Get over it and find another way. Your savior isn't coming.



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 08:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by NotApplicable
Sounds like she is using the 1-2-skip-a-few-100 method.

Recount anyone?


Exactly what I thought for the whole night..."1, 2 skip a few, 99, Mitt Romney!"



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 08:27 AM
link   
These types of shams have been happening for years (and maybe decades). I have kept close watch on the 2000, 2004 and 2008 elections and ALL of them have questionable results with borderline illegal tricks found out AFTER the fact.

This is the most important presidential election possibly ever in American history and will define whether we start WW3, collapse the economy and go further into a totalitarian state. I don't believe that Ron Paul is a savior, nor do I believe if he were voted in as president (which will most likely not happen) that he would have the power to change course in any real way. However, I do believe that he can act as a catalyst for the people themselves to realize the sham and take back their republic away from globalists determined to undermine and control it's power.

If anyone isn't convinced the corporate media will not only look the other way at these practices but would actually help censor (accomplice) it, is at this point naive.
.



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 08:30 AM
link   

WTF??? Vote count rigged!

Rigged? Perhaps. More like extremely outdated and flawed. I don't know why they do the caucas thing like they do. Paper ballots .. people driving ballots around the state in their cars on icy roads in sub-zero wind chills ... why don't they do it by modern methods. It would at least save the human errors from happening. Didn't anyone learn from the 'hanging chads'??



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 08:46 AM
link   
reply to post by daaskapital
 


Always rigged my friend..Our votes are only an illusion created for us to believe we matter..
Our votes don't really count..



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 08:52 AM
link   
Yet another reason to use IRV (instant runoff voting).

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 09:11 AM
link   
reply to post by FlyersFan
 





why don't they do it by modern methods. I


I hope you don't mean Diebold machines, because those are the machines that allowed the 2000 and 2004 elections to be rigged, all there documented, no one cares.



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 09:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by FlyersFan
 





why don't they do it by modern methods. I


I hope you don't mean Diebold machines, because those are the machines that allowed the 2000 and 2004 elections to be rigged, all there documented, no one cares.


You do realize FF was a Bush man and never believed those were rigged? Wasting your time.



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 10:40 AM
link   
I predicted this forum a week ago.



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 10:40 AM
link   
reply to post by antonia
 





You do realize FF was a Bush man and never believed those were rigged? Wasting your time.


Wasting my time? Seems that's all I do on this site now, talk to brick walls and get point reductions from my favorite mod.



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 10:44 AM
link   
I'm just curious..

Do any of these Ron Paul fans actually know how a Caucus works????

Serious question... Maybe that will shed some light on this GIANT conspiracy against Ron Paul (OBVIOUS sarcasm)

Santorum just went to the right places (and it paid off) Plain and simple..


and in the future.. Maybe Paul would be taken more seriously if the fans didnt act like whack jobs and think everything is a conspiracy...



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 10:48 AM
link   
after the 2000 election with all the hanging chads, votes being tossed out, whole precincts not counted etc, i find it highly unbelievable that iowa's voting procedures are so accurate and flawless that someone can win by 8 votes.

there has to have been errors. it's also suspicious that romney changed his schedule suddenly before the caucus and stayed in iowa when he was scheduled to go to new hampshire.

there were over 1700 locations that voting took place. some in remote hick ville parts of the state. i doubt ron paul had 1700 representatives at each location making sure no fraud took place.

then there's the fact this is essentially just a private party nomination and is not a real election. not much different than the any organization picking it's leaders.

i doubt the republicans would let democrats, independents and outsiders masquerading as republicans for a day choose their future president.

at least iowa is important again since romney won. the look of relief, smugness and barely constrained elation by the panel on cnn last night show's the elites got their man.

it looks like the elite's just dodged a bullet.





new topics

top topics



 
13
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join