Why?

Because CNN and the other MSM outlets are dedicating loads of air time as to why Iowa isn't representative of the rest of American and why they shouldn't matter.

Since RP started leading the polls, the MSM has;

- tried to ignore his ranking in the polls by mentioning everyone but him
- tried to say he is "racist"
- tried to say he is evasive because they wouldn't accept his answers on the "racist" theme
- tried to imply his foreign policy is "dangerous"
- tried to turn his support to Santorum
- tried to imply he doesn't respect the office of the Presidency by saying it was a "risk" of candidacy
- tried to invalidate the results of the caucus by saying Iowa is not representative of the rest of the country

They are soooooo afraid......what other proof do you need that the real data shows he will win by a landslide in Iowa?

Originally posted by beanandginger
Why?

Because CNN and the other MSM outlets are dedicating loads of air time as to why Iowa isn't representative of the rest of American and why they shouldn't matter.

Since RP started leading the polls, the MSM has;

- tried to ignore his ranking in the polls by mentioning everyone but him
- tried to say he is "racist"
- tried to say he is evasive because they wouldn't accept his answers on the "racist" theme
- tried to imply his foreign policy is "dangerous"
- tried to turn his support to Santorum
- tried to imply he doesn't respect the office of the Presidency by saying it was a "risk" of candidacy
- tried to invalidate the results of the caucus by saying Iowa is not representative of the rest of the country

Or...

- media was going on and on about how important the Iowa caucus is until Ron Paul started gaining in the polls and suddenly the msm is saying that it doesn't matter if Ron Paul wins because the Iowa caucus is not at all important.

Don't forget that the MSM fabricated a story that GOP officials in Iowa had reason to fear that terrorist hackers were going to try to hijack the caucus.

This fabrication served 2 purposes:
1) The counting of the votes is now being done at a private, "secure", undisclosed location. Totally unprecedented.
2) If RP wins, they can say the results are invalid because hacking of votes took place.

Lies, lies, and more lies. It is now the norm in the media, every day, 24/7.

I truely hope he does.

Not only because I think he is good for America but because he is good for the entire globe.

Also I'm excited as to how the MSM will react to a landslide victory. A close race they can brush under the mat, but a landslide will be tough to cover up, discredit.

Ron Paul has a very good chance at winning in Iowa tonight. So does Mitt Romney...and Santorum has an outside chance of winning as well.

We won't know until the votes are counted.


I don't know why you have a problem with what the media is doing....Huckabee won Iowa last election...yet that wasn't representative of what the rest of the country did. They are reporting current history of Iowa and the fact that they are becoming less and less relevant as an indicator in the primaries.

As a reminder - Iowa picked Barack Obama as the Democratic delegate in 2008.

That will change after the voting fraud is complete.

Iowa is just a start tonight ....making a history in front of our eyes ..what a times ... fight to white house
go Ron goooooooo

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Ron Paul has a very good chance at winning in Iowa tonight. So does Mitt Romney...and Santorum has an outside chance of winning as well.

We won't know until the votes are counted.


I don't know why you have a problem with what the media is doing....Huckabee won Iowa last election...yet that wasn't representative of what the rest of the country did. They are reporting current history of Iowa and the fact that they are becoming less and less relevant as an indicator in the primaries.

We are tired of the Status quo, you might not be, but we are my friend.

RON PAUL 2012!

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
They are reporting current history of Iowa and the fact that they are becoming less and less relevant as an indicator in the primaries.

50% of the time, the Republican candidate that takes Iowa takes the party's nomination, 75% for the Democratic candidate. That's mighty significant. Especially when he's already polling strong in New Hampshire.