Huge News! Obama Must Prove Eligibility in Court Now as Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

page: 43
113
<< 40  41  42    44  45 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 10:22 AM
link   
reply to post by JoshNorton
 





If all of that were true, then why keep asking for the birth certificate if he could be dismissed purely on the above?


Yes, it could go that way.

Depends on the judges. Depends on whether they have a good understanding of what the founders were thinking when they wrote what they wrote.

If you ask the average guy on the street we have all somehow been trained to think he need only be born here.

I posted a couple links to ART II stuff, cant remember exactly where on this thead now. Oh, here they are.

ART II STuff here

More of the same here

But yes, you are correct.
edit on 21-1-2012 by kawika because: added link
edit on 21-1-2012 by kawika because: added link




posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by JohnPhoenix


This is no lie, it's all over the net, being reported by ABC, The Washington Post, Court.US and many others..


Are you serious?

Did you just write out on ATS that something must be true because you read it online and saw it on TV?
For real?


Obama really does have to appear in court and prove to the court, Not Orly, that he's eligible.


That sentence right there gives you away. Not sure why you think anyone would think Orly was also the judge but I never did. Obviously you are missing a detail here.


At this point Orly has little to do with it. it's between the alleged imposter and the Courts.


Oh so Orly plastering "I WON I WON I WON" all over her webpage because of this was pretty stupid if she has nothing to do with it.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Kristinaso
 





Did you just write out on ATS that something must be true because you read it online and saw it on TV?
For real?


Link to ATS post ABC News today about 2 hours ago now

And there is a new thread also, link at link above.

ABC News? Must be something to it...
edit on 21-1-2012 by kawika because: add quote



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by kawika
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
 





Obama really does have to appear in court and prove to the court, Not Orly, that he's eligible. At this point Orly has little to do with it. it's between the alleged imposter and the Courts.


There are five separate cases with five separate judges that are trying cases.

Source


Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp's office is pursuing FIVE separate ineligibility complaints filed by Georgia residents. Each complaint argues that Barack Hussein Obama II is ineligible to appear on the 2012 Georgia Presidential ballot. Secretary Kemp has assigned 5 different hearings under five different judges, so that the complaints can move forward.


I think he only has to appear at the one.

The judges hear the cases, then make a recommendation to the Sec of State as to how he should rule.
edit on 21-1-2012 by kawika because: added link


That is called court shopping and anyone familiar with legal proceedings could explain to you why posting it as if you are proud of it is so funny. This is what happens when your complaint has no merit or legal standing. It is what is known as an act of desperation.

Let me ask, if these court cases finally decide that...oh nevermind. I have asked this before and been told an answer before and the birthers just move the goal posts anyway.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by kawika
reply to post by Kristinaso
 





Did you just write out on ATS that something must be true because you read it online and saw it on TV?
For real?


Link to ATS post ABC News today about 2 hours ago now

And there is a new thread also, link at link above.

ABC News? Must be something to it...
edit on 21-1-2012 by kawika because: add quote



I did not question whether or not you saw it on tv.
Please read my post again and respond when you understand what I wrote, thanks.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Kristinaso
 


Hey, I am totally ready to be done with this.

As I posted previously, in court is acceptable.

Or on Pawn stars with Rick and his document expert. It Rick says it is real and offers the cash. I am on board.

I think we are all pretty sick of it dragging on.

But you must admit, never gotten to court before. If you read the entire piece it says the Secretary used 5 different judges to be fair. But one guy, the sec of state makes the call, stop or go for Georgia. Other states may choose the same route.

If you are really familiar with the facts of the case you must realize why people remain unconvinced. If not I encourage you to read, at least the posts that are starred and become familiar with what is known.

Only the court can settle this, might as well do it now. I don't think it can be appealed. Not a regular trial.

BRING IT ALL IN, PUT IT HERE ON MY DESK!!


The list is frankly a "birther's" dream. Unlike previous cases, where only certain documents were requested or discussed, this subpoena issued by Judge Malihi includes every document that serious eligibility experts have been discussing from the beginning. The list requires Obama to produce each of the following:

Any and all certified birth records including a long form birth certificate.
Certified school/university registration records. Certified immigration/naturalization records.
Certified passport records
Redacted certified Social Security card applications for each of the aliases and other legal names used by Barack Obama, including but not limited to his legal surname when adopted by step-father Lolo Soetoro
In addition, Judge Malihi has reportedly also subpoenaed Hawaii Health Department officials and commanded them to produce an original certified copy of Obama's long form birth certificate.
edit on 21-1-2012 by kawika because: add quote



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:59 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 04:01 PM
link   
I wonder if birthers are ever going to notice all the white guys currently running for president with not birth certificates presented yet. I am sure birtherism has nothing to do with race. It is just a coincidence that the one black guy needs to prove and prove and prove he was born in HI but none of these old white guys need to prove anything anymore. I guess they all just look American.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 04:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Kristinaso
 


It is really more complicated then just the BC issue.

Had you read all the posts you would know about Art II, which implies if Mom and Dad were not citizens, he is not a natural born citizen. Born here, Both parents citizens. That is what it means.

Lots of good links in the posts up above.

Don't want to repeat it all here.

And he knows this, because he was a professor of constitutional law. And that is why he is trying to stay out of court. The judge really knows this, because he is the judge.

In the end if people are ignorant, it does not matter. All that matters is the judge, and what he knows about what the founders wrote, and why they wrote it (King George and all that).



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 04:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by kawika
It is really more complicated then just the BC issue.


True, the problem really is Obama is the legal POTUS


Born here, Both parents citizens. That is what it means.


No, that is what some people WANT it to mean, not what it actually means. Thus Obama is the legal POTUS


Lots of good links in the posts up above.


Not really good links, as they distort the facts.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 04:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kristinaso
I wonder if birthers are ever going to notice all the white guys currently running for president with not birth certificates presented yet. I am sure birtherism has nothing to do with race. It is just a coincidence that the one black guy needs to prove and prove and prove he was born in HI but none of these old white guys need to prove anything anymore. I guess they all just look American.


also funny how no previous president presented any birth certificate....



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 04:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by kawika
reply to post by Kristinaso
 


It is really more complicated then just the BC issue.


No, it is not complicated at all. Birthers want to complicate it but that does not actually make it complicated if you know what is going on.


Had you read all the posts you would know about Art II, which implies if Mom and Dad were not citizens, he is not a natural born citizen. Born here, Both parents citizens. That is what it means.


That right there tells me all I really need to know about you and your type. You assume because I do not care or agree about something someone wrote, I must not have even read it. That is crazy logic at best. It implies nothing of the sort. You however have inferred it.



Lots of good links in the posts up above.


Not really.



Don't want to repeat it all here.


Then stop assuming I have not read past posts for no good reason. I really do not understand the workings of a birther "brain."



And he knows this, because he was a professor of constitutional law. And that is why he is trying to stay out of court. The judge really knows this, because he is the judge.


Or, as a professor of constitutional law, he knows that you, a random person typing on a forum are wrong.

I am sure it is one of those both just as likely options.




In the end if people are ignorant, it does not matter. All that matters is the judge, and what he knows about what the founders wrote, and why they wrote it (King George and all that).


Actually it matters to me because I already know how it will turn out and I think it is a crime that birthers would waste public time and money on it anyway. If they were not so ignorant, we could use that time and money for something useful and that matters to me.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 05:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kristinaso
I really do not understand the workings of a birther "brain."


And obviously you don't understand that where there's smoke, there's fire, either.

But that's par for the course.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 05:59 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


There are over 100 threads on the issue. None of which have found even a spark. Not even an ember. Seems as if birthers are fanning dead coals.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 06:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by TrueAmerican

Originally posted by Kristinaso
I really do not understand the workings of a birther "brain."


And obviously you don't understand that where there's smoke, there's fire, either.

But that's par for the course.


That is the most oddly placed and poorly put personal insult I have ever received. I understand the concept just fine. Unfortunately, there is no smoke here. Birthers keep screaming about smoke that does not exist. That means your fire is just as delusional. Feel cocky about that while another court case yet again proves you guys have nothing but ignorance and fake smoke to go on.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 10:42 PM
link   
Here's a short Video on the Story. It is a good watch in my opinion.
Youtube is keeping the video views down to stop it from trending!

NEW! Obama Summoned to Court Jan 26,2012!


A Georgia judge has refused a demand from Barack Obama to quash a subpoena to appear at a series of administration hearings Jan. 26 at which residents of the state are challenging, as allowed under a state law, his name on the 2012 presidential ballot.

Judge Michael M. Malihi said;

"Defendant's motion suggests that no president should be compelled to attend a court hearing. This may be correct. But defendant has failed to enlighten the court with any legal authority," the judge continued.

"Specifically, defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is 'unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony ... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.'"
(READ THE FULL ARTICLE by Bob Unruh AT THIS LINK) www.wnd.com...



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 11:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by kawika

Certified school/university registration records
Certified immigration/naturalization records.
Certified passport records
Redacted certified Social Security card applications for each of the aliases and other legal names used by Barack Obama, including but not limited to his legal surname when adopted by step-father Lolo Soetoro


A problem there is Obama would have never had any of them (nor would anyone else) nor could he obtain them....
edit on 21-1-2012 by spoor because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2012 @ 03:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by cuervo

Originally posted by TrueAmerican
So, does that get any of you Obamites nervous? Think that BC is going to hold up in court? What do you think they'll find in his college records?


I CAN'T WAIT!!!


Nervous? Hardly. The only thing that makes me nervous is this will make the GOP as a whole look even more ridiculous and vicariously hurt Dr. Paul's chances. This BC nonsense is a proven hoax. PROVEN. He has provided everything the racist hillbillies have been asking for. It's only making themselves look like racists. There are no other grounds on which to accuse him of non-citizenship other than his ethnicity. I would almost guess that this is a ploy by Obama to make the msm-right look even more cartoonish than they already do.


"Racist hillbillies"? Do you even read what you type? That comment is in itself racist, against any and all that don't believe the proven fake documents he's produced. Not to mention, it's racist to assume that one cannot disagree with a person of another color without race being the reason.

Now, as for the BC stuff, it is NOT proven. The birth certificates produced HAVE been proven to be hoaxes, however. The multiple SSN data is proven as well. It is also a fact that he's avoided showing ANY of these documents in court, to be verified. ALL we have is online versions. Can't register a child for school that way, but he can be president based on that? Plus, the HIS campaign demanded that McCain prove his eligibility. Was he being racist then? McCain, for the record, DID prove it. Your guy plays dodge ball with the issue. A bit hypocritical, don't you think? There are videos on YouTube RIGHT NOW that show both he AND his wife stating that he's Kenyan. His grandmother states she was at his birth, in Kenya. His college records are sealed. NO ONE from one college even remembers him. But you want to make it about race? Really?



posted on Jan, 26 2012 @ 03:47 AM
link   
Huge news?

Really?
Its funny how ATS is the only place where i have heard of it.
Huge news in my humble opinion would mean news that is broadcast globally making headline news for all to see.

Huge news pffftttt



posted on Jan, 26 2012 @ 03:50 AM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


"The only people who don't want to disclose the truth, are people with something to hide." - Barack Obama

Ironic, isn't it, that he's tried so hard to hide everything about his past! He even calls himself Kenyan, and so does his wife. He's made mistakes talking about his own supposed history, and people that attended the college he supposedly did have no memory of him at all. Two different hospitals named, then records changed. The laws concerning birth certificates in Hawaii changed. The way SSN are assigned changed. Records sealed. Even hints that his mother wasn't pregnant that summer. Then there are the years of dodging the issue in the courts. Well, according to what he said (and you can see that quote on video), he's hiding something. What, I don't know, but something!





top topics
 
113
<< 40  41  42    44  45 >>

log in

join