|
|
Topic started on 10-9-2004 @ 02:31 PM by Ranger426
|
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more ATS Sponsored Games & Events topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 10-9-2004 @ 02:35 PM by Bangin
|
Hmm, nice find.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-9-2004 @ 11:02 PM by HUNT_ADMIN
|
I'm not sure how much more we can give you... without giving you the answer!!!
Captains! Help the lost ones!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 01:43 AM by JCMinJapan
|
Us captains? BWAHAHA Ok, I have not followed it along toooo much. Let me get caught up and see if I can muster some of the old magic. Shaking the
cobwebs loose.
[edit on 15-9-2004 by JCMinJapan]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 03:50 AM by JCMinJapan
|
I have read up a bit in the last hour, so I am going it a bit blind at the moment. I will try to give some observations here. Not sure if they will
mean anything to you or not. I hope that it will help.
One think that I noticed about this page that Ranger found was at the bottom below the HTML, there is this code: < !--- members2-15 --- >
Now, on ATS member # 2 is 2 Netchicken. and there is no member 15.
Now, members 2 to 15 are :
2 Netchicken
3 William
4 alien
5 Shadow
6 Midnight Mutilator
7 Bob88
8 Thomas Crowne
10 Zion Mainframe
11 Kano
12 Estragon
13 MidnightDStroyer
3 MONTHS AGO THE FTP WAS HACKED AND THE ENTIRE DIRECTORY DELETED I checked www.freewebs.com... but it does not exist.
At the bottom of the page, there is a counter. It does work, so the numbers mean nothing. But, look at this
counters.freewebs.com...
The name is hammurabi???? Quite strange as I do not remember any counters in the Rings game.
Also, by the statements written, it is obvious that 417/333 is important here. I am assuming that it is important with the picture on the page.
I will post more if I can think of anything. This all I got with about 10 mintes of looking. I will try to get caught up. I hope that this can
helpo someone with something.
[edit on 15-9-2004 by JCMinJapan]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 03:54 AM by pennyforyourthoughts
|
One think that I noticed about this page that Ranger found was at the bottom below the HTML, there is this code: < !--- members2-15 --- >
I think It has been proven that every freeweb site has the string < !--- members#-# --- > at the bottom of it.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 05:34 AM by Durden
|
If this has already been discussed I apologize, but I did a member search on
Anne and
Craig. None of the two members have posted anything yet. Odd
coincidence?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 05:38 AM by Cutwolf
|
I think you got something. Both were last active on "31-12-1969 at 07:00 PM"
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 05:45 AM by Durden
|
Originally posted by Cutwolf
I think you got something. Both were last active on "31-12-1969 at 07:00 PM"
The date doesn't mean anything; it's just something that turnes up on all members with no posts.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 06:19 AM by sanctum
|
Originally posted by Durden
Originally posted by Cutwolf
I think you got something. Both were last active on "31-12-1969 at 07:00 PM"
The date doesn't mean anything; it's just something that turnes up on all members with no posts.
I see last active 31-12-1969 at 06:00 PM.
Also, why 07 or 06 if time is pm? I thought a 0 prefix only applied in the am.
Unless it's meant to be converted to 24hr time, eg:18.00 or 19.00
Btw, ATS didn't exist in 1969.
Sanc'.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 09:37 AM by pineappleupsidedown
|
yes, but all computers atomatically set to that date when they dont have one already...has to do with when computers were invented?
---pineapple
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 10:00 AM by sanctum
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 03:28 PM by zsandmann
|
Since HA asked nicely:
From the Big Bend Incident Website
There's also supposed to be some kind of secret government document that discusses this event, the Haskins, and a cover-up.
I talked to someone on a discussion board who has seen it, but now they don't remember where they found it
(it didn't seem like anything at the time). Also, he said, there is one hidden other document, based on some kind of
coordinates, that reveals everything.
The coordinates 417/333
From the document
G. FOLLOW UP: IN THE EVENT THERE ARE UNACCOUNTED IMAGES RELEASED IN THE WILD, THE THREE NUMBERS AT COORDINATE 417/333
WILL PROVIDE THE RESOLUTION.
From Ranger
I didnt make thos sights. I have a couple friends who are realy into ufo and alein resarch and they gave me the links.
Im tying to get thme to post here, but they us a differnt board than ATS. They also said theirs some secret documnt
about this they saw 2 or 3 years ago.
From drjim
I confess to not having the time to read the entire thread, but am amazed at the exceptional investigative thinking shown
by many members. Here is an additional piece of the puzzle: www.abovetopsecret.com...
(thank you for the directory Simon). The entire document contains enough information for a specific "Freedom of Information
Act" request by a U.S. citizen for what seems to be a "Big Bend Incident Seven" (which is causing us to wonder about the
first six). We're working with an associate to initiate this action.
The 417/333 are X/Y coordinates for your picture. Try pixels.
The three numbers are RGB values at the point.
What you do with those RGB values I am leaving for you to discover.
Z Out
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 03:56 PM by mags
|
yeah, if you check out the other threads on this topic that has already been determined the RGB values are: R-105 G-98 B-129 I'm thinking resolution
could mean resolution of the images...not sure how to use the RGB values to get there...but there is FOR SURE hidden numbers in the mountain
landscape, they repeat also, I just can't make out what they are getting at. I tried to eliminate all of that color pixel at 417/333 and it really
didn't give me anything...?????
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 04:05 PM by pennyforyourthoughts
|
mags I cant confirm that. This is image 1
see the RGB values I get? Different from before.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 04:10 PM by AgentSmith
|
Uh.. Could they be the pixels on the picture:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
And not the UFO images?
Going to check this myself but thought I'd post this here so you all could check it to!
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 04:14 PM by pennyforyourthoughts
|
already done that smith
image is black and white
so the rgb are only
0,0,0 (for black) or 255,255 255 (for white)
pixel 417/333 is white
[edit on 15-9-2004 by pennyforyourthoughts]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 04:23 PM by AgentSmith
|
Oh sorry!! just an idea.........
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 04:26 PM by pennyforyourthoughts
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 04:27 PM by Irma
|
Thats livened it all up a bit!!
Just occured to me about the old pixel 417/333...
Should we count along from the left, then down or along from the left, then up?????????
If it's along and up then the RGB values are different
#1 55 109 195
#2 90 138 212
#3 65 123 204
Does this help or just confuse the issue even more??
Just to add, these colours are.....
#1 376DC3
#2 5A8AD4
#3 417BCC
[edit on 15-9-2004 by Irma]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |