It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A deep, hexagon-shaped feature lies above Saturn's north pole, newly released images from the Cassini spacecraft reveal. The strange structure appears to be nearly stationary and may be a wave that stretches deep into the giant planet's atmosphere.
NASA's Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft glimpsed parts of the feature nearly 30 years ago, but because of their viewing angle, they were not able to see the whole thing. Now, Cassini's visual and infrared mapping spectrometer has captured the entire hexagon for the first time, thanks to a series of infrared images it took as the spacecraft flew over the pole in October and November 2006 (see Cassini snaps Saturn from a dizzying height).
The hexagon spans nearly 25,000 kilometres - the width of two Earths - and appears to be a clearing in the clouds that extends at least 75 km below the planet's visible cloudtops. Watch a movie of clouds whipping around Saturn's strange hexagon .
"This is a very strange feature, lying in a precise geometric fashion with six nearly equally straight sides," says team member Kevin Baines of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, US. "We've never seen anything like this on any other planet."
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
And STILL can't get the noggin around this double hexagon - I think it looks like it has been blown up from the inside of the crater - relics of a past war perhaps?
The possibility of impacts of large meteorites on the thin crust of the early moon accounting for the formation of the hexagonal lunar craters is discussed. Solidified basalts comprising a lunar crust of thickness 10 to 50 km characteristic of the earliest stage in lunar evolution are shown to have a large-scale hexagonal pillar structure, due to the effects of shrinkage. Results of experimental simulations of the propagation in this hexagonal pillar structure of the shock wave generated by the impact of a meteorite of diameter 10 km and mass 10 to the 15th kg on the lunar crust are then presented which demonstrate the pushing away from a central circular shock of pillars resting on a low-friction surface in a hexagonal pattern.
Originally posted by Raivan31
It's just always seemed strange to me that these moons, or more specifically our own moon has one side facing the earth all the time, and our satellites need constant course correction to achieve this.
All pairs of gravitationally bound bodies tend to "sync" like this. However, it takes billions of years to become as apparent as the case of the Moon's sole face toward the Earth. In fact, most Moons in the solar system are sufficiently small compared to the planets they orbit that, over time, gravity has proven strong enough to lock the satellites' rotations to match their orbital periods.
The Moon is tidally locked to the Earth. When two rotating bodies orbit each other, they raise tides in each other. These tides cause mechanical friction. So tidal activity absorbs a lot of energy out of the rotational energy of the bodies. In other words, the energy in the form of rotational inertia is partially converted into tidal, geophysical changes in the bodies involved.
The Moon's rotational inertia has been exhausted, converted into geophysical change in the Earth and Moon. The Moon, being much smaller than the Earth, long ago dissipated enough energy to lose rotation so that its tidal bulges are now always aligned with the gravitational pull of the Earth.
The Earth still raises a "tide" in the Moon but it is in a balanced, steady state now and does not stretch the rock any more -- there's no more spin for the Moon to give up.
Since the Earth is still spinning relative to the Moon, the Earth is continuously and dynamically being affected by the gravitational pull of the Moon. The mechanical friction includes fluid flows around the Earth's surface as ocean tides, motion of the molten core within the Earth as well as the stretching of solid rock along the planet's crust. (For a sense of scale, note that maritime tides are recorded in meters while tides in the solid aspect of the Earth are recorded in centimeters.)
This mechanical drag is a major reason for why the Earth's rotation is slowing. The day length is slowly lengthening, and has over geological time increased to 24 hours, up from 18 hours. Eventually, the Earth will no longer spin in relation to the Moon. Some time many billions of years into the future, the Earth will turn its same face to the Moon as well.
Why Doesn't the Moon Rotate?
Then there's the whole, moon ringing like a bell when something hits it.. thats a bit odd.
Between 1969 and 1972, Apollo astronauts placed seismometers at their landing sites around the moon. The Apollo 12, 14, 15, and 16 instruments faithfully radioed data back to Earth until they were switched off in 1977.
The first three were generally mild and harmless. Shallow moonquakes on the other hand were doozies. Between 1972 and 1977, the Apollo seismic network saw twenty-eight of them; a few "registered up to 5.5 on the Richter scale," says Neal.(Clive R. Neal, associate professor of civil engineering and geological sciences at the University of Notre Dame)
A magnitude 5 quake on Earth is energetic enough to move heavy furniture and crack plaster.
Furthermore, shallow moonquakes lasted a remarkably long time. Once they got going, all continued more than 10 minutes. "The moon was ringing like a bell," Neal says .
On Earth, vibrations from quakes usually die away in only half a minute. The reason has to do with chemical weathering, Neal explains: "Water weakens stone, expanding the structure of different minerals. When energy propagates across such a compressible structure, it acts like a foam sponge—it deadens the vibrations." Even the biggest earthquakes stop shaking in less than 2 minutes.
The moon, however, is dry, cool and mostly rigid, like a chunk of stone or iron. So moonquakes set it vibrating like a tuning fork. Even if a moonquake isn't intense, "it just keeps going and going," Neal says. And for a lunar habitat, that persistence could be more significant than a moonquake's magnitude.
Moonquakes
And if all of these tidal forces and gravity and what-have-you are acting on the moon then why is there no volcanic activity?
Stranger still is why these moons don't rapidly degrade in orbit and impact their planets. the moons around gas giants must be under incredible strain.
Tidal acceleration is an effect of the tidal forces between an orbiting natural satellite (e.g. the Moon), and the primary planet that it orbits (e.g. the Earth). The "acceleration" is usually negative, as it causes a gradual slowing and recession of a satellite in a prograde orbit away from the primary, and a corresponding slowdown of the primary's rotation. The process eventually leads to tidal locking of first the smaller, and later the larger body. The Earth-Moon system is the best studied case.
The similar process of tidal deceleration occurs for satellites that have an orbital period that is shorter than the primary's rotational period, or that orbit in a retrograde direction.
the moons around gas giants must be under incredible strain.
The Roche limit was first described by Edouard Roche in 1848. The Roche limit is the closest distance an object can come to another object without being pulled apart by tidal forces. If a planet and a moon have identical densities, then the Roche limit is 2.446 times the radius of the planet.
A large moon orbiting inside the Roche limit will be destroyed. The Earth's Roche limit is 18,470 km (11,470 miles). If our Moon ever ventured within this Roche limit, it would be pulled apart by tidal forces and the Earth would have rings.
The four gaseous outer planets do have their rings systems inside of their respective Roche limit. The Roche limits for the gaseous planets are:
Jupiter - 175,000 km (108,000 miles)
Saturn - 147,000 km ( 92,000 miles)
Uranus - 62,000 km ( 39,000 miles)
Neptune - 59,000 km ( 37,000 miles)
On July 7, 1992, Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 broke apart in 21 pieces due to tidal forces when it made a close approach of Jupiter which was within the Roche limit. On the subsequent pass, each of the pieces of the comet impacted Jupiter.
What is the Roche limit?
Typically, the Roche limit applies to a satellite disintegrating due to tidal forces induced by its primary, the body about which it orbits.
Parts of the satellite that are closer to the primary are attracted by stronger gravity from the primary, whereas parts further away are repelled by stronger centrifugal force from the satellite's curved orbit.
Some real satellites, both natural and artificial, can orbit within their Roche limits because they are held together by forces other than gravitation. Jupiter's moon Metis and Saturn's moon Pan are examples of such satellites, which hold together because of their tensile strength (that is, they are solid and not easily pulled apart).
In extreme cases, objects resting on the surface of such a satellite could actually be lifted away by tidal forces. A weaker satellite, such as a comet, could be broken up when it passes within its Roche limit.
Since tidal forces overwhelm the gravity that might hold the satellite together within the Roche limit, no large satellite can gravitationally coalesce out of smaller particles within that limit.
Indeed, almost all known planetary rings are located within their Roche limit, Saturn's E-Ring and Phoebe ring being notable exceptions. They could either be remnants from the planet's proto-planetary accretion disc that failed to coalesce into moonlets, or conversely have formed when a moon passed within its Roche limit and broke apart.
I'm sure people have answers for this but it still seems odd.
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
Can anyone explain this especially the left circled anomaly and what appears to be a raised wall akin to a fort of some type?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/fc424f22254dd24f.jpg[/atsimg]
And STILL can't get the noggin around this double hexagon - I think it looks like it has been blown up from the inside of the crater - relics of a past war perhaps?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/84483bcf2c1daad5.jpg[/atsimg]edit on 2-1-2012 by watchZEITGEISTnow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
STRUCTURES
Back on topic!
Originally posted by Arken
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
Can anyone explain this especially the left circled anomaly and what appears to be a raised wall akin to a fort of some type?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/fc424f22254dd24f.jpg[/atsimg]
And STILL can't get the noggin around this double hexagon - I think it looks like it has been blown up from the inside of the crater - relics of a past war perhaps?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/84483bcf2c1daad5.jpg[/atsimg]edit on 2-1-2012 by watchZEITGEISTnow because: (no reason given)
Brilliant discovery!
Thx for this thread!
S&F!
Originally posted by Violence
To the OP. If you're going to investigate YouTube video's, and things about Moon's et cetera, try investigate some actual facts, and learn some real things first before bringing threads like this.
Example : Tidal locking.
Lol @ 14 flags already.edit on 3-1-2012 by Violence because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
Originally posted by alexs
reply to post by Raivan31
the orbit of the moon coincides with its rotation yes it does rotate
yet we only see one side of the Moon - no other known planetary body does this ...
Now why do you think that is?
So the moon rotates about its axis, why are there no photos of the 'backside' of the moon, taken from earth? and not many pictures of the 'backside' of the moon taken from satellites?(Am I wrong about the last sentence?)