It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by artistpoet
So you are sticking to your idea that the Pyramids were built as ancient tombs - Ok so be it - You are entitled to your view as I am to mine.
I am well aware that no Hieroglyphs are to be found in the pyramids - My use of Authentic pertains to my saying that they were not built as tombs which you choose to differ on.
So by what you are saying you believe a prior civilisation did not exist - Your choice
The evidence is very clear. There is NO evidence for a prior advanced civilization. There is no evidence that the pyramids pre-dated the Egyptians. The lack of inscriptions inside of the pyramids is consistent with Egyptian constructions to that point in time.
Thus you have failed to substantiate your claim.
Why should sea fossils be found thousands of feet up in the mountains of Peru.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by artistpoet
Why should sea fossils be found thousands of feet up in the mountains of Peru.
Tectonic uplift
Peru sits right at the border of the Nazca plate and the South American plate. This is the exact area you would expect orogenic uplift to occur.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Legend121
so you‘re obviously living under a rock. Let me guess.. 3mile, chenobyl, fukishima are figments of our imagination & never actually happened.
1. The claim is that the world is being poisoned. The release events at nukes have not poisoned the world. Your claim is false.
2. Silly straw man arguments are irrelevant
3. Fluorides are good for our teeth - one right
4. Straw man arguments about extinctions are irrelevants
5. The Mayans didn't carve stone - False, please learn about the Mayans
They were just a bunch of primates who worshipped goatheads
You make extreme overt racial comments. That's very sad.
6. The new reference to 2012 is not a long count date.
7. There are no predictions or prophecies associated with the end of the long count.
here i was thinking you‘re a prime example of a hoaxer.. But then again it seems im right! Im still waiting for you to provide sources to back all your claims. ‘Thats crap so thats that‘ is the debate of either a moron or a fraud. Taking things out of contex to try & make someone or something sound bad is again the tactics of a moron or fraudster. Nice try to take it out of context trying 2 make me sound racist, but the original reflects truth. But i guess i am racist against the ignorance & stupidity you are trying to pass off as mockaintellect. It seems you are pulling same crap on others wanting to post opinions on here, with the same unfactual tripe. You seem to have an over-inflated view of yourself, when in reality you are a genius only in your own mind... You seem selective in your responces, which is yet another fraudster trait. A debate is an exchange of ideas, with goal to challenge such ideas, not as you‘re doing, attacking every1 with a different opinion. Especially when you‘re simply talking tripe, with no proof.
Please supply sources!
well said... Im still waiting for the explanation on ancient maps etc despite providing sources a few times, the same excuse of source plz bounces back. He seems to avoid anything that doesnt fit in the box. Seems very selective also, only providing sources if it suits the purpose... Sigh! If it were so easy to replicate the pyramides, then why have todays archetechs clearly stated that with thats at their disposal today, ie lasers, tools, equipment, knowledge etc they would be unable to accomplish the same feat in todays world, and the precision of accuracy still has them baffled let alone being able to replicate it. I think you have raised some good points that are supported by some of the worlds leading archetechs. Thumbs up!!
Originally posted by artistpoet
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by artistpoet
What is there to debate? There is no evidence whatsoever for an advance civilization that was destroyed.
That is not true and just your opinion - I guess you think the Giza pyramids were built as tombs for Pharoahs also.edit on 9-1-2012 by artistpoet because: (no reason given)
Have you looked at the work of Graham Hancock?
Timothy West?
The Earth has faced masive upheavals in the past - Why should sea fossils be found thousands of feet up in the mountains of Peru. Exactly when do you think Human History started.
Not only do I think there has been a prior civilisation highly advance but also I believe other civilisations have existed.
well said... Im still waiting for the explanation on ancient maps etc despite providing sources a few times, the same excuse of source plz bounces back. He seems to avoid anything that doesnt fit in the box. Seems very selective also, only providing sources if it suits the purpose... Sigh! If it were so easy to replicate the pyramides, then why have todays archetechs clearly stated that with thats at their disposal today, ie lasers, tools, equipment, knowledge etc they would be unable to accomplish the same feat in todays world, and the precision of accuracy still has them baffled let alone being able to replicate it. I think you have raised some good points that are supported by some of the worlds leading archetechs. Thumbs up!!
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by artistpoet
Have you looked at the work of Graham Hancock?
Timothy West?
The Earth has faced masive upheavals in the past - Why should sea fossils be found thousands of feet up in the mountains of Peru. Exactly when do you think Human History started.
Not only do I think there has been a prior civilisation highly advance but also I believe other civilisations have existed.
Again you are not providing evidence for advanced civilizations as you claimed you would. Instead you now refer to authors of pseudoscience fiction such as Hancock. Hancock is a fraud perpetuating pseudoscience by avoiding the evidence and constructing falsehoods such as pole shifts.
Fossils above sea level are the result of orogenic processes.
So you believe in an advanced civilization,but you are unable to provide any evidence. No surprise there is zero.
Read up where did I CLAIM to provide evidence.
They say if you go along with the agenda your gonna do just fine unless some upstart challenges the accepted story line. Dont tell me I imagine such a thing for such a thing occured to a famous DNA Pioneer whoms family I know - except he told the Rockerfeeller Institute to take a march - Hence they stole his papers.
The way they keep the truth from getting out and brainwashing people like you with a only a thin veil of reality hidden behind deception.
So where did I Claim to provide Proof of a lost civilisation that once existed - It is said they were a pretty arrogant lot also - Highly advanced technologically - Understanding things we are only just getting knowledge of like Harmonics and anti gravity fields and technology that can utilise the Earths magnetic field or do we also not exist like our fabled forebears.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by artistpoet
Read up where did I CLAIM to provide evidence.
You are right for a change you never ever provided evidence yet you have made outrageous unsubstantiated claims such as the existence of advanced civilizations in the past.
Atlan? laughable. Plato is the original source for Atlantis. ALL commentary derives from Plato.
It is pseudoscience. It is fiction. It is based on falsehoods, misrepresentations, and luring money away from the gullible.
They say if you go along with the agenda your gonna do just fine unless some upstart challenges the accepted story line. Dont tell me I imagine such a thing for such a thing occured to a famous DNA Pioneer whoms family I know - except he told the Rockerfeeller Institute to take a march - Hence they stole his papers.
Just more unsubstantiated nothingness.
The way they keep the truth from getting out and brainwashing people like you with a only a thin veil of reality hidden behind deception.
The fact is that if you are not innovative you lose your job. The asinine claims about scientists having to toe the line is the sort of nonsense espoused in the pseudosciences. This claim is the hallmark of charlatan that begs people to take their side.
So where did I Claim to provide Proof of a lost civilisation that once existed - It is said they were a pretty arrogant lot also - Highly advanced technologically - Understanding things we are only just getting knowledge of like Harmonics and anti gravity fields and technology that can utilise the Earths magnetic field or do we also not exist like our fabled forebears.
There is zero evidence for an advanced civilization in the past. ZERO. NADA. Nothing.
If there anything at all you would have provided it. You did not. You know this is a fiction.edit on 9-1-2012 by stereologist because: (no reason given)edit on 9-1-2012 by stereologist because: (no reason given)
I also read that Plato heard of Altland through myth ie stories that often and do record historical events.
there were biblical upheavels not as the Flood in in the Bible for that was several thousand years later when the ice caps retreated from the northern hemisphere.
In fact there was an earlier inundation which triggered what we term as The Egyptian Civilisation who moved down into the fertile Nile Basin.
So Plato goes to see these dudes
They speak of the cataclysm and how major land masses rose and fall - The Greek Islands were part of a larger area than they are today but eventually much of this was submeged leaving what we know today as the Greek Islands and very nice they are too.
I know what your response will be for I understand your thought pattern somewhat but go ahead for old times sake buddy
I am getting tired of this - So to sum up
You believe that the pyramids were built with hand tools as tombs for Pharoahs
There has never been a proir civilisation to our own
There have never been great floods as described in the bible or Sumerian texts
I believe the pyramids were built utilising technology from a prior civilisation
A prior technologically advanced civilisation existed before our own
There have been several great floods recorded in myth and ancient writings
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by artistpoet
This inability to get things right is tiring. This is what you posted.
I am getting tired of this - So to sum up
You believe that the pyramids were built with hand tools as tombs for Pharoahs
There has never been a proir civilisation to our own
There have never been great floods as described in the bible or Sumerian texts
I believe the pyramids were built utilising technology from a prior civilisation
A prior technologically advanced civilisation existed before our own
There have been several great floods recorded in myth and ancient writings
This is what I have been posting:
1. The pyramids were built by ancient Egyptians and are part of a funerary complex. To suggest that the ancient Egyptians were incapable of doing that work is folly.
2. There have never been advanced civilizations in the past
3. Global floods have never happened. I did not post this before, but the Sumerian tale does not appear to be global. There are some myths, but no global flood has actually happened.
I have asked for any evidence whatsoever to support your claim of a prior advanced civilization and you have provided nothing.