Incorrect; Sitchin’s translations have been shown to be incorrect – which is why they are rejected. We can compare what he says they say with the geological, archaeological and other scientists to show he was wrong. We did that and guess what he is wrong
Oh really? And who is in charge of that other "archeological" evidence? I am sure they are not friends with Sitchin and they have their own agenda. That is not valid evidence. I have no reason to trust or "believe" those others. If you wanna be their puppet, your decision. I stay impartial until clear evidence is provided.
Sure we can – please present all evidence of ancient gold mining in the manner Sitchin claims, please present the facts that support his claim that man cannot move 200 ton stones even today, please present evidence that a planet can have a 3600 year orbit and not be detected, please present evidence of an atomic war and advance technology on earth, etc. .....again lets see the three top claims by this man you think haven’t been placed in the dumpster of fringe
This is what have been found so far about the ancient mines. If you donate the money, a group of people will gladly uncover everything and unearth the evidence once and for all. www.viewzone.com...
As far as moving not 200. But 1000 ton stones, I should just have replied "lol" however, it has been explained hundreds of times by engineers and machinery operators that we do not have the technology to move for example stones like the ones in baalbeck. Not only because of the weight, but also because of the dimensions. As a matter of fact, YOU prove how a 1000 ton stone was moved in the past.
So...a planet with a 3,600 year orbit hasn't been found. Are you sure? ok I know your emotions are running through the roof calling "conspiracy theory" and all those stupid cards. However, NO. NASA WILL NOT tell you the truth. Believe all you want like if Obama was your God, but NO. THEY WILL not tell you the truth. So you are basing your own emotional conclusions in what they tell you. That's your big problem. Oh and again, NO. THEY WILL NOT tell you the truth. Otherwise, prove it.
Ancient nuclear explosions: www.youtube.com...#!
Argument from emotion – they don’t make sense in the light of evidence – and what evidence would you accept? Certainly not scientific evidence, which you belittle – please out line the manner of evidence you would accept, lol
Common sense is based on logic, not emotion. I realized already you have the concepts wrong and never took critical thinking class. Why the ancient writing is not evidence? So the Declaration of Independence is not evidence of the Revolutionary War? or is only because it happened "yesterday" and since the other happened 8000 years ago that gives you the "right" to discredit their knowledge? Classic human opportunist behavior
That has already been done, now if you want to you can believe them. I don't the scientific community does, but you are free to do as you like. Your refusal to accept that is your own deeply emotional problem. If you think the debunking of his work is in error please show were the errors are. Jumping up and down shouting that this hasn’t been proven isn’t going to work.
Of course is not going to work because it cannot be proven wrong. Duh...In the case of the joke of evolution, there is no evidence that proves the transition into homosapiens. Only evidence of the previous creatures. That's why is a theory. A ridiculous one by the way.
DOE teaches science as does the western world – what you believe is belief. I see you also concede the point on your claim that scientists follow ‘the guy at the top of the line’, yep you were wrong (note: take a look at which countries don’t teach evolution as part of science). It is taught as theory as all good science is.
Nope. Not belief. Again, this is out of your emotional daily life. Is based on logic and reason.
Ah, so you back down again on another silly claim, okay we are making progress
This statement doesn't make sense, but is explained as a way to respond in abcense of argument.
Got another one wrong, eh? Yes once Gagarain (who was a human by the way, lol) went up they knew man could survive in space
You are trying to change the topic. If you have evidence that American "scientistszzz" officialy took the Gagarin experience to update their assumptions, then publish it. Otherwise, the point is to put in evidence the ridicule conclusions "scientistszz" make based on nothing. But that's how easy is to manipulate average emotionals.


