It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Video, Two UFOs landing in France

page: 1
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:15 AM
link   
Just found this on Youtube, the channel owner claims to have filmed this themselves.




I was filming the little village in front of a big river, the Loire (Orléans, France), when I saw these 2 UFO landing on earth. They looks like the famous Triangle UFO, but without lights on it. The 2 UFO have probably landed in the forest. I had to go, so I can't tell you if they have take off since. Filmed by me, in France, Orléans, January 2012. (11:04 am)


Could be legit but I've got my doubts, like a too good to be true type of thing


Rip it apart ATS.
edit on 1/2/2012 by martianmallow because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:20 AM
link   
First thing to point out is that he's filming from inside and he makes this clear when he zooms out which causes a reflection from either himself or someone else - as soon as he zooms out the objects disappear below so already I'm skeptical - its rather coincidental. You can't really see what the objects are but my gut feeling is telling me someone behind the camera that is in the same room has control of the two objects. I think its a hoax - this is my opinion.

EDIT: The objects appear to be marks on the window.
edit on 2-1-2012 by ProfessorT because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:21 AM
link   
probably fake considering there is a little personal advertisement for someone's Yootoob account channel, there are other things wrong with the video but i'll let everyone else get on that

second thought, its definitely fake

edit on 2-1-2012 by Gwampo because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:23 AM
link   
reply to post by martianmallow
 


Who knows? What makes me skeptical is this was supposedly filmed today and in his excitement he had the time and presence of mind to add an eerie sound track? Red flag.



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:23 AM
link   
reply to post by martianmallow
 


That landing actually did look legit. But there was none of the amazing aironautics and extreme speed that we commonly see in a UFO. Still they were coming in for a landing so you'd expect that to happen. On the other hand there are earth vehihes that actually can land like that. Just ask any aviation expert. The picture was pretty grainy too so how are we to know that it's just a bird



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:25 AM
link   
reply to post by Gwampo
 


Yeah I found the little watermark kinda strange as well, and they do have multiple UFO videos but most of them are other peoples' videos. Just this one and another one I found were actually filmed by the owner. I also had trouble trying to see where the second UFO comes from it sort of just appears there.

reply to post by newcovenant
 


Haha I had the sound off so I didn't notice the music

edit on 1/2/2012 by martianmallow because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:26 AM
link   
I don’t know… first of all, another blurry, shaky UFO video. They just happened to be filming the horizon for no reason at that time. Also if these did land in France, wouldn’t we have heard that France surrendered to them already?



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by martianmallow
 


Who knows? What makes me skeptical is this was supposedly filmed today and in his excitement he had the time and presence of mind to add an eerie sound track? Red flag.


Also he had time to add a company logo at the start of the film. I say it's a hoax



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:30 AM
link   
I am calling fake. First of all, when he is filming, the viewer is unable to see anything for a bit. Afterwards you see it. My question is, how did he see something that far away, that small that he decided to pick up the camcorder and record it? The camcorder could barely pick it up from afar!

Oh, and from this distance, both aircraft seem to be a copy of the same thing. Also, gthey both have the exact same landing trail if you know what i mean.
edit on 2-1-2012 by daaskapital because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:30 AM
link   
reply to post by D1Useek
 


How do we know that they just came to see the Eiffel tower and eat frog legs.

I wouldn't but aliens might have strange tastes
edit on 2-1-2012 by Truthseeker45 because: Just joking



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:34 AM
link   
IMOHO...if...I were actually filming 2 UFOs landing...I wouldn't be saying "gotta go"...and not film anymore.

I'd be there with camera in hand filming everything I could......
edit on 2-1-2012 by Destinyone because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:34 AM
link   
I think if i filmed real ufos like this, before i posted the video i would put my logo on there so people would know the source. And adding a sound track isnt that hard. As for the specks on the window they clearly move when hes stable. Pople need to try not be so damn skeptical. Its very one sided.



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:37 AM
link   
Sorry but in my honest opinion, any UFO film uploaded with weird musical audio to add to the eerie feeling of a UFO presence just holds no credibility at all.



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by Destinyone
IMOHO...if...I were actually filming 2 UFOs landing...I wouldn't be saying "gotta go"...and not film anymore.

I'd be there with camera in hand filming everything I could......
edit on 2-1-2012 by Destinyone because: (no reason given)


Me too, id also be running to where it landed with the camera still filming. .



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:44 AM
link   
I think I have a seizure after watching that video.

I realize it's hard to keep a camera still.

But oh my goodness.

lol



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:46 AM
link   
reply to post by D1Useek
 


a googleplex of stars from me



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:47 AM
link   
reply to post by n00bUK
 


Too true. Why would you film a UFO landing and not dash to the landing zone. Also with the editing and all how can we trust that the UFOs weren't edited too



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 08:58 AM
link   
I gotta always question these 'WTF kinda UFO sightings" that have background music piped in.

I mean, do they really think that's going to help their credibility or.......will it suggest they have an imaginative and entertaining type of mindset?

Plus, this dude has 10 videos of UFOs shot by him???? Really?
7-billion people walking this planet where less than 2% (I suspect) actually get to see an up-close UFO sighting in their backyard yet this dude has the fortunate luck of seeing them ten times????

Wow. He's a lucky lucky fella alright!


And THIS is why the Billy Meier story looks odd to some (not me though. I believe him)
But Billy never flaunted his findings (until much later in life) like these clowns do.
edit on 2-1-2012 by Human_Alien because: grammar



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 09:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Yeah you're right I didn't look at the channel hard enough apparently!!
Lots of people like this on youtube and I just got caught up in the BS. Booo me

But this is what I have you guys for -group hug-



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 09:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by CharonIncarnate
I think if i filmed real ufos like this, before i posted the video i would put my logo on there so people would know the source. And adding a sound track isnt that hard. As for the specks on the window they clearly move when hes stable. Pople need to try not be so damn skeptical. Its very one sided.



Are you counting those sides? That would be 3 sides against. Let's remember that being skeptical and being "dammed" are not necessarily a package deal although I admit they often do appear together in the same individual.


Human_Alien is right. Part of what is used to determine authenticity of these reports and film is the reaction of your witness(s) or the photographer. If their reaction is masked or even absent you have to ask why? Genuine reaction and body language, other "tells" of one type or other add to or take away from the proof and credibility of a film and UFO report.
edit on 2-1-2012 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join