It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ShadowLink
reply to post by Akragon
Guy last I looked
And thank you.
. . . Christian scripture, Theology and Tradition teach that God did not "come into existance' but has always existed and always will exist. To prove otherwise is impossible and begs the question, "Who created God', which muddies the whole debate, . . .
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?” - Epicurus
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by lightseeker
Current "theology" may teach this but I would like to see the evidence for "Christian scripture", and a tradition which predates the Dark Ages that teaches this.edit on 3-1-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
That is not difficult to provide. Read the writings of Justin Martyr, Irenaeus or Origen who among several other early Church fathers wrote extensively about the nature and pre-existance of God the Father and Jesus Christ, using the very same scripture references that we find in contemporary Bibles,(after being translated from the Greek, of course). All three wrote during the early 2nd century AD. Thier translated writings are available at any public library, most Christian and some secular bookstores.
Read the writings of Justin Martyr, Irenaeus or Origen who among several other early Church fathers wrote extensively about the nature and pre-existance of God the Father
Originally posted by IEtherianSoul9
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?” - Epicurus
thinkexist.com...
That is sad, really; a person of your intelligenece and intellect being unable to entertain new ideas . . .
Christians, how would you counter this quote by Epicurus?
First say to yourself what you would be; and then do what you have to do. Book III, ch. 23
May I ask, how exactly does that quote counter the original?
They're both rather unrelated.
All external events are determined by fate, and are thus beyond our control, but we can accept whatever happens calmly and dispassionately. Individuals, however, are responsible for their own actions, which they can examine and control through rigorous self-discipline. Suffering arises from trying to control what is uncontrollable, or from neglecting what is within our power. As part of the universal city that is the universe, human beings have a duty to care for all fellow humans. The person who followed these precepts would achieve happiness and peace of mind.
First say to yourself what you would be; and then do what you have to do. Book III, ch. 23
Originally posted by Seed76
Now, may I ask you a question?. According to the genesis account, man became God and learned the difference between good and evil, by disobeying the creator, and as consequence distanced himself from God, the question is this : If man is God then where evil comes from? And if man as God knows the difference between good and evil, then why is suffering, starvation, poverty etc all around us?
Originally posted by Seed76
"Is man willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why blame God?”
Two parts. According the Genesis, Man didn't become god. They gained the knowledge of truth and evil. Man obviously isn't God, neither by the ideologies of the bible writers, nor by any common definition of the word God.
Secondly, providing this is true, which it isn't. It would prove nothing.So if you're proving God's existence, by proving Man is God. You're only "proving" that man exists.
Man is not omnipotent. For a few reasons. Including the fact that man isn't god.
Most suffering in this world, isn't caused by man, but is a result of the things that man doesn't have the power to control. Some suffering comes from malevolence, or overall selfishness and greed. Though mankind is mostly composed of, at least mostly, good people.
Suffering arises from trying to control what is uncontrollable,or from neglecting what is within our power.
Going back to the problem of evil:
If God is Omnipotent
If God is Omniscient
If God is Benevolent
Then Evil cannot exist. Because God wouldn't allow it.
Any other kind of God, doesn't cause the problem of evil.
If man is god, then the problem of evil doesn't exist,
because man isn't Omnipotent or Omniscient,
For I was hungry, and you gave me to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave me to drink; I was a stranger, and you took me in; naked, and you covered me; sick, and you visited me; I was in prison, and you came to me. (Matthew 25:35-36)
and of varying levels of Benevolence.
First say to yourself what you would be; and then do what you have to do. Book III, ch. 23
Also, it's not about "Blaming" God.