Bob's Home Video, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 19 times


reply posted on 16-1-2012 @ 08:10 PM by gariac
reply to post by A51Watcher



Where are the 3 pieces of element 115 that Bob allegedly had?

Please stop avoiding this question.



reply posted on 16-1-2012 @ 08:49 PM by A51Watcher
Originally posted by gariac
reply to
post by A51Watcher



Where are the 3 pieces of element 115 that Bob allegedly had?

Please stop avoiding this question.



I never avoid questions.

I do however answer them in their proper order. I will answer that question AFTER you have answered the questions already put to you, that you are avoiding.

The current question in line waiting an answer from you is:

Did we also forget all the other witnesses who confirmed this to George Knapp during his investigation in the same video provided above?

5 I believe was the number. Have any idea who they might be?



Please stop avoiding this question.


reply posted on 16-1-2012 @ 09:30 PM by A51Watcher
And now we move on to a closer examination of what can be seen in Bob's video using slow motion.

As you will have noticed by now, the light this craft is emitting has an odd 'glittering'.

Slow motion helps reveal what the cause of this glittering is.

Keep in mind that the photographer and all the additional witnesses tell us this is a disc maneuvering in a confined area and is itself the culprit responsible for the glittering, yet nay sayers would have us believe this is either:

- A Janet flight coming to or leaving from Groom Lake

or

- Some type of advanced military aircraft doing the same


Keep these various 'alternate explanations' in mind while watching the clip, first at normal speed, then in slow motion -





Quite clearly, standard aircraft lighting coming or going from Groom Lake can not account for the:

-Various levels of brightness seen or the strobing effect on and off for various periods.

-Various sizes seen from small to large and back again repeatedly.

-Aircraft obviously cannot suddenly reverse direction mid- flight.

So clearly the weak 'alternate explanations' can not account for what was seen and recorded.

The account given by the witnesses who were actually there DOES match what we see, unlike the lame ones offered up by those who were NOT there.


Here is a 2nd clip taken from even later in the footage, which again gets smaller then large then back small again (also shown with normal speed first then slow motion) -






You will note from upcoming clips taken by myself and other independent investigators this same odd 'glittering' at times who will confirm what the object is and the reason for it being the source of this.


reply posted on 16-1-2012 @ 11:36 PM by gariac
reply to post by A51Watcher



Case closed. Bob Lazar failed to produce the one piece of evidence that would have vindicated himself. Why? Because he doesn't have any 115. It doesn't get any simpler than that.


reply posted on 18-1-2012 @ 01:50 AM by gariac
reply to post by A51Watcher



Answer the question. Where is the element 115 that Bob had?

OK, since you won't answer it, I will. Bob never had any element 115. If he did, he would have vindicated himself, rather then end up as an obscure 5 letter word in a UFO crossword puzzle.

Case closed. Book 'em Danno for promiscuous utterances of inoperative statements.


reply posted on 18-1-2012 @ 04:41 PM by InsideYourMind
Originally posted by gariac
reply to
post by A51Watcher



Answer the question. Where is the element 115 that Bob had?

OK, since you won't answer it, I will. Bob never had any element 115. If he did, he would have vindicated himself, rather then end up as an obscure 5 letter word in a UFO crossword puzzle.

Case closed. Book 'em Danno for promiscuous utterances of inoperative statements.


www.abovetopsecret.com...

Don't expect to get answers out of people if you cannot answer questions directed at you.

Why are you appearing to be 100% sure that lazar is a "fake" or a "disinfo" agent. You have absolutely nothing to suggest that is the real deal about him. Instead of dismissing every single bit of evidence or eye-witness testimony, can you not accept the possibility and question that evidence instead of denying it.


reply posted on 18-1-2012 @ 04:53 PM by gariac
reply to post by InsideYourMind



Eyewitness testimony is not very good. Physical evidence rules. Clearly Bob Lazar was never at the scene of the crime. No 115 in his possession, he was never there.

I am not on trial here. Bob Lazar and his church members are on trial. The judge has ruled: GUILTY!



reply posted on 18-1-2012 @ 06:38 PM by Pimander
reply to post by gariac


Your ability to judge anything looks very shaky based on your complete refusal to admit where you have already been proven CLEARLY INCORRECT.

So when you going to admit you were wrong? Never? When are you going to answer questions put to you before you threw some in? Never, because you just want to change the subject to divert attention from your own lack of insight, knowledge and honesty. You want to pretend hanging around A51 and "EYE WITNESSING" what goes on there makes you an expert on something you are clearly ignorant about.

When you can admit you are wrong, you might be in a position to start to "judge" other peoples cases. If you can't then you lose.




reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 05:03 PM by gariac
reply to post by Pimander



Feel free to trash talk me all you want. I look at the source and deem it insignificant.

You simply fail to address the question. Here we go again:

Bob Lazar claims to have element 115 in his possession. Rather than be part of the greatest scientific discovery of century, Lazar never produces the sample. Lazar is mocked by all that analyze his story, but never produces the one bit of physical evidence that could clear his name.

But alas, time marches forward and Lazar never produces the stable element 115 he possesses. Clearly the man is a liar. If you refuse to accept such evidence, that is your choice. Even Dulce has it's church.


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 11:16 AM by A51Watcher
reply to post by gariac



I do however quite enjoy your posts, because they easily prove that debunkers don't have a leg to stand on.

Please continue.


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 11:17 AM by gariac
reply to post by A51Watcher



Perhaps instead of insulting me again, you could answer the question: where is the element 115 Bob Lazar claims to have. It is a simple question.

Oh yeah, the rumors are starting that Lazar is dead again.


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 12:23 PM by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Pimander



Maybe the dulce story is fake but dumbs are real. You should do a phil schneider search to get some second hand knowledge. The guy was killed shortly after coming clean about working for the government as a geologist building a few.



Some build by DOD and others built by DOE for classified research projects and/or doomsday bunkers. You need top secret clearance or better to work for these national laboratories and they are called special access programs(SAPs).
edit on 1/20/2012 by EarthCitizen07 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



JANET FLIGHTS now Trackable on PlaneFinder
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
Most of NTTR Blacked Out in GE for 9/11/2010
  Posted 16 days ago with 3 member flags
Janet WWW278 flights over the range
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags
wHat is this? what they do earth soil?? area 51 google earth
  Posted 10 days ago with 2 member flags
N8300T odd NV65 flgiht
  Posted 7 days ago with 2 member flags
any one know what Autec is?
  Posted 5 days ago with 2 member flags
Edwards F22 crash site...then and now
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags
Groom Lake Site II and Site I
  Posted 11 days ago with 1 member flags