posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 03:21 PM
I can understand the point of view of both sides on this topic. The problem is that Iran has been the real problem in that whole region for quite some
time, Iraq was not necessery, afghanistan was. Because we went into Iraq on false claims it is just bad to say the same thing with Iran. However Iran
does have Nuclear research labs, and has made outrageous statements about Israel and the US, stating they would wipe Israel off the map.
Iran must be delt with in some fashion to keep them from possibly posessing a nuclear weapon, and there have been many attempts at stalling there
reserch, but not enough. An attack on Iran will in fact cause an all out war, but at what point do you draw the line and say the international
community must sit and watch this country with all these threats make a WMD.
What if the international community waits to long and in six months Iran detonates a test nuke, then we are in the same position as north korea, a
lunatic with a big freeking bomb. Also Iran has a stable econmy and can afford to fight a war for some time. The ice has to break at some point, I
hope for all our sakes Iran is not making a bomb and is truthfully using its nuclear program for energy means.
edit on 2-1-2012 by TheMur
because: (no reason given)