War With Iran by George Galloway

page: 3
41
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 11:56 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 




posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 12:34 PM
link   
reply to post by FOXMULDER147
 


he is not talking about aircraft bombing the uk , he is talking about them striking back with planted explosives.
the uk has an open door for such people to come into the uk ,
my god we can't even keep out economic migrants from comming in to take advantage of our generous wellfare system , so what chance do we have in keeping out people that intend to harm us .



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 03:21 PM
link   
I can understand the point of view of both sides on this topic. The problem is that Iran has been the real problem in that whole region for quite some time, Iraq was not necessery, afghanistan was. Because we went into Iraq on false claims it is just bad to say the same thing with Iran. However Iran does have Nuclear research labs, and has made outrageous statements about Israel and the US, stating they would wipe Israel off the map.

Iran must be delt with in some fashion to keep them from possibly posessing a nuclear weapon, and there have been many attempts at stalling there reserch, but not enough. An attack on Iran will in fact cause an all out war, but at what point do you draw the line and say the international community must sit and watch this country with all these threats make a WMD.

What if the international community waits to long and in six months Iran detonates a test nuke, then we are in the same position as north korea, a lunatic with a big freeking bomb. Also Iran has a stable econmy and can afford to fight a war for some time. The ice has to break at some point, I hope for all our sakes Iran is not making a bomb and is truthfully using its nuclear program for energy means.
edit on 2-1-2012 by TheMur because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:08 PM
link   
Unfortunately your man of the hour, how intelligent.
He showed Rula Lenska didn't he....

How to destroy any credability you may of had.



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by D8ncer
British politician George Galloway who was against the Iraq War has a chat on his radio channel with a guy who thinks striking Iran is a good idea.

Totally agree with what george says and makes the guy look an idiot in about 5 minutes flat.

"I'm just dealing with the issue of intelligence"


What he said at the end is just class.



edit on 1-1-2012 by D8ncer because: (no reason given)


That was great, I've always liked George. He's one of the few that will tell it exactly as it is without the BS. In essence if you fight back when we attack then your a threat. No wonder the US is going down the tubes.



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:16 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:18 PM
link   
reply to post by D8ncer
 


Just thought I'd post this link, which is an interview Galloway did for our very own ATS back in 2005

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:25 PM
link   
reply to post by D8ncer
 


Here is a video of Galloway trying to crawl up Saddam Hussein nether regions.



I saw him once in real life. A little sweaty man.



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by rigel4

Originally posted by jrmcleod

Originally posted by rigel4
George Galloway is a self serving Fraud, do a little research on the guy........

Start with Oil and gifts from Saddam.

Oh and personally i think he made a complete fool of himself in front of the senate.


Well EVEN if he is...he is clearly on a level par with every other politician because you can bet your bottom dollar they are all in it for the money and good times!!!. What he says is the truth and it would be wise to listen to him, but if calling him a fraud is worth fueling your ignorance then so be it...


No no, I am not Ignorant my friend, George Galloway is a fraud, he pretends to be the man in the know, he sells
himself as the fair man,, but like you pointed out he is out for himself like all other politicians. The man has zero creds.

He has tried the same thing over and over, he was Saddams friend, he was Gaddafi's friend, he supported the Lockerbie bomber, He is now the Iranians friend............. He hates America................................

George Galloway is no one's friend but George Galloway's .

edit on 1-1-2012 by rigel4 because: (no reason given)


Anyone can come on this forum and spew unsubstantiated allegations such as you're doing. Try to do better or give it a rest. At least George Galloway distinguishes himself by speaking rationally, bases his statements on facts which anyone can verify, and speaks in specifics rather than the unverifiable broad generalities which are the trademark of the warmongers.

Prove that Galloway is the friend of Saddam, the friend of Ghaddafi, and the friend of anyone in the Iranian power structure. Prove it or give it a rest.

Prove that George Galloway hates America rather than what America does to people in the countries it occupies. Prove it or give it a rest.
edit on 1/2/2012 by dubiousone because: Spelling and softening of inflammatory language.



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:32 PM
link   
reply to post by D8ncer
 


Here is a Hilarious video of a TV producer ripping George a new one as George unsuccessfully tries to make excuses for Imans who preach violence against non Muslims.




posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:32 PM
link   
If most politicians were like him< we wouldn’t be in the big deep # we are.

Christian vicker getting stoned. what a statement>

Get him over to Amsterdam>
edit on 2-1-2012 by D8ncer because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:40 PM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 


He will never win but is right as far as Im concerened.;
edit on 2-1-2012 by D8ncer because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by D8ncer
British politician George Galloway who was against the Iraq War has a chat on his radio channel with a guy who thinks striking Iran is a good idea.


Ex-politician.

He was expelled from the Labour party in 2003

He was unsuccessful in the 2004 Euro elections

He lost his seat in Parliament in 2010.

Later in 2010 he unsuccessfully ran for the Westminster Parliamentary seat of Poplar and Lime house. He came third.

In 2011 he ran for the Scottish Parliament but again was unsuccessful.



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:49 PM
link   
reply to post by woodwardjnr
 


I love this guy, listen every Friday on talksport. Everyone has their own opinion of how they perceive Galloway. He is like marmite, love it or hate it.............LOL
edit on 2-1-2012 by vesta because: forgot the y



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Soldier81
 


Would you care to explain why you feel that way.



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:53 PM
link   
reply to post by D8ncer
 


Galloway tries to justify 9/11 and gets destroyed by Hitchens




posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:56 PM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 


Funny that , most would see him as a muppet, that would never make real politics.

But he says more in five minutess of the above forum than most can get across in five years. At least he knows whats comming and most like you are stupid to see it.
edit on 2-1-2012 by D8ncer because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by ollncasino
reply to post by D8ncer
 


Here is a Hilarious video of a TV producer ripping George a new one as George unsuccessfully tries to make excuses for Imans who preach violence against non Muslims.





Thanks for that, shows the little @rsehole up for what he is.



posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 05:59 PM
link   
reply to post by D8ncer
 


Taliban sympathiser George Galloway owned by 2 Afghan Nationals




posted on Jan, 2 2012 @ 06:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by D8ncer
Funny that , most would see him as a muppet, that would never make real politics.

But he says more in five minutess of the above forum than most can get across in five years.


Had Galloway been around in 1939 and 1941 he would have applauded the Anschluss as the Germans "taking land that was rightfully theirs" and the attack on France as "righteous payback for imperialist WWI"





new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join