It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shark_Feeder
Originally posted by openminded2011
So, because I disagree on 3 of his positions, and that is enough to remove my willingness to vote for him, why is that a such a problem for you?
...Waiting for a response to my last post again.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
[
Oh Mr. Shark_Feeder...for someone who likes to demand immediate responses to their replies...you seem to have ignored my reply to you.
If he were to be Elected our next President , this Bill , which has Now become Law , would be repealed by a newly elected President Paul along with it's enabler the Patriot Act by Executive Order .
Originally posted by Shark_Feeder
Originally posted by openminded2011
reply to post by Zanti Misfit
If you read my post, you will see that I have chosen not to vote for Obama.
You just want to convince everyone to NOT vote for the one canidate who wants to fight the corruption in our country.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by Shark_Feeder
We differ in philosophy. I believe the Federal Government is needed to set a minimum level of regulation and let the States do more if they choose.
You want to strip that minimum level of regulation...the only reason I can see for that is to allow States to lower that regulation for their own profit.
Do you disagree that the States could enforce more regulations if they wanted to???
Originally posted by Shark_Feeder
Ron Paul wants to put the descisions in the States' hands. Decentralizing authority and all that.
Just noticing that you were using my arguments of common law to imply that I have no knowledge of the water cycle, and to question my intelligence. All on the basis of another topic, that is ignorance my friend.
Hence the need to local enforcement...Imagine if there was ONE police department to contact for all crimes in the USA... seems silly huh?
My argument is that he is reducing the UNCONSTITUTIONAL reach of out corrupt Federal Government.
Can you argue that the FED has not overreached it's Constutional authority?
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Ron Paul supporters need to calm down.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by Shark_Feeder
The States are allowed right now to put their own regulations in place, their own punishments, and their own crack down on corruption. They just can't go lower than the Federal regulations.
So if you believe that the States would do this once the EPA is gone...why haven't they done it already???
Originally posted by Algernonsmouse
When people like yourself get upset and suggest I am being disrespectful, do you ever take a moment of introspection? How much respect should one give to those who use dishonesty to attempt to persuade? How much respect am I shown by being lied to? Seem rather disrespectful and it starts with you. Paul does not want a state run EPA. You are just making things up.
Actually none of that happened. It was your bold claim that AS A BIOLOGIST
you had knowledge that you then went on to demonstrate you did not.
local enforcement of WHAT???????????
Originally posted by naraku
"I know a lot of people like him because of his isolationist position on world affairs and his willingness to legalize weed,"
He is a non interventionist. He does not want weed to be legalized, he wants to leave it up to the states. How much do you know about Ron Paul again?
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
The OP has not IMO, presented his Case in a convincing fashion taking into account All the reasons Why he feels he would not Vote for a man like Ron Paul for President . His lack of familiarity with Ron Pauls Stance on the Key Issues facing our Country today is obvious . I was just trying to see if he was open to a broader Reasoning in seeing that .
Originally posted by openminded2011
reply to post by Zanti Misfit
If you read my post, you will see that I have chosen not to vote for Obama.
you and others place their faith in the State governments....I don't. I think the Federal Government is necessary to oversee and set a minimum set of regulations.
If I'm looking to bribe someone and I either have the choice of trying to bribe one organization that controls everything...or I have a choice of 50 organizations...I would pick having the system where I could bribe one of 50. The odds are much better that I will find someone.
I think you forget that the States are just as broke as teh Federal Government
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
The OP has not IMO, presented his Case in a convincing fashion taking into account All the reasons Why he feels he would not Vote for a man like Ron Paul for President . His lack of familiarity with Ron Pauls Stance on the Key Issues facing our Country today is obvious . I was just trying to see if he was open to a broader Reasoning in seeing that .