It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by openminded2011
reply to post by yourboycal2
I am more in favor of thinking with the mind than the heart. He is just another right wing republican with a bend. He will continue the agenda of the 1 percent at the expense of everyone else. All you have to do is look at his positions and its plainly visible. He wants to cut taxes for the rich and corporations, gut environmental and labor protections, and eliminate the social safety net. This is just the same bag of goods they have been selling since Reagan, with disastrous results. You can pack manure in a pretty box and gift wrap it and spray it with perfume, but it still contains manure.
Originally posted by Propulsion
I completely understand your point of view on why you would not vote for Ron Paul. In saying so, who do you believe should be the next POTUS? And why would he/she be better for America and its people?
Originally posted by openminded2011
reply to post by Shark_Feeder
Your answers are based on your personal opinions as a biologist. Am I allowed to disagree with you?
You said Ron Paul would bring a "return to the guilded age of powerful elites???" TOO LATE! That's where we are now. That's why we want to elect Ron Paul, because he will change that.. Why do you think the media and powers that be don't want Ron Paul to be elected, because he will change that. Funny how your entire last comment was a REASON to VOTE for Ron Paul, you just got Dr. Paul confused with Newt Gingrich, I understand. Such an obvious TROLL thread you started here.
reply to post by sKILLsEw
I have said what I felt I had to say on this thread, I will say one more thing. IT IS YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE FOR WHOEVER YOU WANT, if you think Ron Paul is the man to be president, by all means vote for him. But make sure you look at every aspect of his platform, not just the ones that appeal to you. That is what has concerned me, and that is why I posted this thread. I agree on his position that we should keep our noses out of other peoples business and stop being world policemen But his domestic policies are troubling to me and I feel would harm a lot of people who are already barely making it. So I wanted to call attention to them. IT was not my intention to demean Mr Paul or anyone chosing to vote for him, I just wanted to bring to light some things I think people should pay attention to. Peace and good luck to us all.
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by openminded2011
Just out of curiosity, are you a Registered Voter in your State ? If not , that would kind of make this Whole Thread Pointless, wouldn't you think ?
Originally posted by DrunkenshrewSmall government means, many of those employed by the state will lose their state-provided jobs. In Russia, people lost also parts of their pensions. In Russia, the free market did not provide much alternative sources of income for those, who have only those skills they developed to cope with the previous environment. To hope for a different outcome in the United States is in my opinion wishful thinking. Most of your productivity has already been outsourced. Health care will become unaffordable for even more citizens than today. The unemployed often develop depressions. In Russia alcohol addictions skyrocketed and many depressed Russians committed suicide.
Originally posted by Wookiep
Just due to the fact that he/she singled out Paul as a NON voter is pretty telling. This kind kind of childish trolling should be banned from ATS. Just look at all the "I won't vote for Ron Paul" threads lately where the OP refuses to talk about what candidate they would vote for. Lame.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Wookiep
Just due to the fact that he/she singled out Paul as a NON voter is pretty telling. This kind kind of childish trolling should be banned from ATS. Just look at all the "I won't vote for Ron Paul" threads lately where the OP refuses to talk about what candidate they would vote for. Lame.
You honestly want someone to take you seriously?
Some people actually see the reality of Ron Paul in charge.
And its damn scary.
Originally posted by Openminded2011
1.)I know a lot of people like him because of his isolationist position on world affairs and his willingness to legalize weed.
2.)So lets live in a feudal oligarchy, but at least you can smoke weed?
3.)On abolishing the EPA: The disaster in the Gulf of Mexico would become one of many disasters if this is allowed.
Originally posted by Openminded2011
I am more in favor of thinking with the mind than the heart.
Originally posted by Openminded2011
He is a wolf in sheeps clothing and I am worried that people dont seem to see this or want to see this.
Originally posted by openminded2011
I am not trying to attack anyone, I am sorry if bringing these points up makes people uncomfortable.
Originally posted by Openminded2011/i]
You wont answer (my questions) because you don't know.
Originally posted by Openminded2011
Please explain this. I dare one RP supporter to give a valid explanation for these positions.
Originally posted by Shark_Feeder
Originally posted by Wookiep
If you're trying to state that the constitution is dangerous, then go ahead with your friends in the media.
Originally posted by Annee
Giving power to the states - - only magnifies the problem times 50.
Originally posted by Shark_Feeder
Originally posted by Annee
Giving power to the states - - only magnifies the problem times 50.
So you believe that every single state government is hopelessly corrupt? If that is the case changing the state government(such as running for governor) is alot easier than altering a massive overreaching government(running for president).
Originally posted by Shark_Feeder
Originally posted by Annee
Giving power to the states - - only magnifies the problem times 50.
So you believe that every single state government is hopelessly corrupt?