It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Israeli soldier Amnon Neumann testimony of 1948 genocide

page: 2
24
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 07:16 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


The ANZAC Lighthorsemen fought the Ottomans in WW1, doppy!



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 07:18 AM
link   
reply to post by arollingstone
 


No no no matey......

These threads are ALWAYS about Israel but never about the war crimes of the Americans in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan because according to the Americans their military are just innocent bystanders on a peace mission dropping humanitarian aid, right?



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 07:24 AM
link   
reply to post by gladtobehere
 


Aw gee shucks......

at least Israel's PMs have actually done military service before serving their nation as leader........and here we have a part African who is confused by his real name and can't find his birth certificate, never spent one single day in the military and is now Commander and Chief of the most sophisticated military in the world and knows squat about anything and needs a teleprompter to say just afew words!

What's his name? Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro or Bari Shabazz ......even he does'nt know! Well, at least he got the first letter of his name right!



edit on 1-1-2012 by bluemirage5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 07:30 AM
link   
reply to post by bluemirage5
 


There's plenty of threads on US atrocities and those of other nations. If you personally feel there aren't enough, you can start some. However, you cannot justify derailing a thread because of your own personal convictions on another subject.

You wouldn't like it if you created a thread about US atrocities and everyone starting saying "well you think that's bad, look at Israel!" Or if you created one about UFO sightings and someone said "that's not important, let's talk about JFK" - that isn't how this forum works.

This thread is specifically about Amnon Neumann's testimony, not which nation has comparatively racked up the most war crimes.



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 08:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by gladtobehere
 


Aw gee shucks......

at least Israel's PMs have actually done military service before serving their nation as leader........and here we have a part African who is confused by his real name and can't find his birth certificate, never spent one single day in the military and is now Commander and Chief of the most sophisticated military in the world and knows squat about anything and needs a teleprompter to say just afew words!

What's his name? Barry or Barack......even he does'nt know! Well, at least he got the first letter of his name right!
edit on 1-1-2012 by bluemirage5 because: (no reason given)


Serving in terrorist organizations count as military service? I guess it does seeing how they vote wanted terrorist in as PM's. Nothing is better than having a baby killer running things. The rest of your post is nothing but tea party ignorance.



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 08:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Dr Expired
Hollywood justifies the almost ad nauseam reminders to the Gentiles about the Concentration camps, as it serves to attempt the purpose of never allowing it to happen again.

Yet it did happen again three years after the liberation of the Polish death camps.

But the victims this time were arabic in descent not Jewish.



But arabics are considerd Semitic people because they lived in that region for thousands of years and are the real "biblical" people. Also many Jews lived in those lands as well so it was an unbroken line of anti semitism right into zionism.



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 08:37 AM
link   
reply to post by arollingstone
 


Really? Lets count them all shall we? Then we'll compare them to the number of threads targeting Israel.

Do you really want to do that?


edit on 1-1-2012 by bluemirage5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 08:39 AM
link   
reply to post by buster2010
 


Better to vote in a man we all know - both past and present history.......

and Barry aka Bari aka Barack? What's his history again?



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 08:42 AM
link   
reply to post by filosophia
 


Yeah, right......and how many non-Jewish/non-Arab people spread all around the world who also have semetic bloodlines? You'll be shocked to know it's alot more than the Arabs and Jews put together!!!!!



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 11:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by xuenchen

The ANZAC Lighthorsemen fought the Ottomans in WW1, doppy!


yes I know now. spoor told me.
 



reply to post by bluemirage5


at least Israel's PMs have actually done military service before serving their nation as leader........and here we have a part African who is confused by his real name and can't find his birth certificate


this is his birth certificate:

 




reply to post by filosophia


But arabics are considerd Semitic people because they lived in that region for thousands of years and are the real "biblical" people. Also many Jews lived in those lands as well so it was an unbroken line of anti semitism right into zionism.


and Arabic is a Semitic language !


Arabic is a Central Semitic language, closely related to Hebrew and the Neo-Aramaic languages, and also related to the South Semitic languages (e.g. Amharic in Ethiopia, Tigrinya in Ethiopia and Eritrea, and Mehri in Yemen and Oman) and the extinct East Semitic languages (e.g. Akkadian, first attested nearly 5,000 years ago). The written language is distinct from and more conservative than all of the spoken varieties, and the two exist in a state known as diglossia, used side-by-side for different societal functions.

Arabic language

 



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 11:44 AM
link   
Quotes from the opening post:



"arabs had no military organization"

"villagers deported"

"women killed, children killed." Described as the "worst elements of war"


Does anything in the Old or New Testament say that this violence is part of true Zionism ?

I always assumed that non-violent was the true intentions.



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 11:46 AM
link   
If you guys did not notice, bluemirage is a troll and he is trying to derail this topic. I will report him as such and for trying to derail the topic. I suggest you guys step up your reporting game too, there are countless threads he and other zionist trolls have derailed via the same tactics. Wake up.



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Zionism was coined in the 19th century and some Torah Jews believe Jews were better off living peacefully in host countries but the holocust changed that and Israelis independence as we see was nothing but propaganda. Neuman says as a child they were told the land ws deserted, which of course it was after the military slaughter.



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Zionism was coined in the 19th century and some Torah Jews believe Jews were better off living peacefully in host countries but the holocust changed that and Israelis independence as we see was nothing but propaganda. Neuman says as a child they were told the land ws deserted, which of course it was after the military slaughter.


Hmmm.

Makes me wonder why we keep hearing about ancient rights granted by God himself.

Maybe this is why some heavy duty Orthodox Jews are anti-Zionist.

Does anyone know when the first official Hebrew military force was formed?

was it in ancient times?



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 12:22 PM
link   
Another Zionist atrocity uncovered.

They will deny this and play the victim card, as they always do.
edit on 1-1-2012 by Truth4Thought because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 12:32 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Yeah....another version of THAT birth certificate.......you really want to go there?

Are you paying attention?

Semetic bloodlines has nothing to do with what region they reside today!

Surely you are more intelligent than that! Let me say it again, are you aware of how many non-Jewish/non-Arab people spread all around the world who carry semetic blood lines? Answer: they amount to alot more than all the Jews and Arabs put together. What does that tell you? Now I know many people who have more semetic blood running through their veins than any one single Ashkenazi or "Anglo" Jew or "mongrel" Arab. Oops, I think I let a cat out of the bag!


edit on 1-1-2012 by bluemirage5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 12:36 PM
link   
reply to post by filosophia
 


Zionism was coined in the 19th century?

Lets get one thing clear here......

there are 2 different forms of Zionism, one is political and the other is spiritual

"Spiritual" Zionism has been around for thousands of years!

Even today's Palestinian Arabs are Zionists!



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 12:37 PM
link   
reply to post by bluemirage5
 


Well,

I thought "Semitic" was a language.

Not a bloodline.

Is the Mongolian language Semitic?



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 12:37 PM
link   
reply to post by InfoKartel
 


Of course you will because thats what people like you do when someone tells you something that does'nt follow your agenda!

Join the line!



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 12:39 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


No, it's a bloodline of a very ancient tribe of people who did'nt necessarily come from Israel but is where Avraham originated from.



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join