It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Krono
Originally posted by Observor
So it is not OK for the Syrian government to kill its own people but OK for the US to murder many times more in a miltary intervention?
Are you the officially designated murderers of the world? Guess you think so.
Firstly I'm British not American.
And I said, I can't stand it when the US goes in the weak countries guns blazing just for oil. HOWEVER, the sanctions to prevent Syria from mass murdering it's people are clearly not working, Assad and the opposition clearly don't want to have a "peace talk" so what can the UN do about it?
Let me remind you, the UN are supposed to be all about "peace" and sometimes you gotta fight fire with fire in order to gain that peace.
Originally posted by Krono
Firstly I'm British not American. And I said, I can't stand it when the US goes in the weak countries guns blazing just for oil.
Originally posted by Pervius
There's blood on your hands.
Originally posted by Observor
The UN is about peace between nations, not within a nation. The peace or the lack there of within a nation is not the business of the UN or another nation.
The IRA and the UK government fought for decades and there was nothing the UN could/would do about. Why does the lack of peace between the Syrian government and the rebels become an issue for the UN?