Assault weapons ban expiring., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 10-9-2004 @ 05:33 AM by CazMedia
So the assault weapons ban here in the USA is set to expire, and it looks like the Congress/Senate dont have the political backing/will to vote to extend it.

I say good riddance!

First off, this shows the power of the gun lobby....The NRA!!
The fact is they are organized and have alot of voters that would not be kind when elections came around if the legislators took action.

2nd....now look at the ban, what does it really do?
Full auto fire weapons have ALWAYS been banned! We are talking about semi-auto weapons with flashier looking bodies and extras. A 9mm handgun will shoot the SAME AMMO just as FAST as the 15 guns on the list will.
What usually gets these guns on the list is things like type of scope, type of stock/grip, size of ammo magazine and other options, not the type of bullets or the rate of fire. so whats the differance?

As i work in the news, i KNOW that AK-47's are being used by CRIMINALS on a semi annual basis....(these guns are bigger than a pistol, and draw more attention, you cant just stuff it down your pants)...
BUT,
their shooting the same bullets that their more concealable handgun uses at the same rate of fire....also note that shooting as fast as you can from the hip is way more innacurate than holding up a pistol and looking down the sights. (the pistol is lighter and easier to use too)

Note i said CRIMINALS are the ones causing these weapons to be used for illegal purposes. When is the last time you've heard about a law abiding citizen that owns the same kind of guns commiting a crime with them?

HHMMM, if only criminals have these guns, and responsible citizens dont,
then i guess that means that the criminals have the upper hand vs a citizen protecting his family, using his gun for sport, or mearly legally collecting them and not using them.
This is not right. This removes the good citizens rights to bear arms because of a minority of citizens have a problem.

Al queda seems to always have FULL AUTO guns when i see them on TV, so in this age of terror, we the people SHOULD at least have a SIMILAR (Non-auto) weapon for defense.

Now i know cops,and many will say that these guns are dangerous, but how can this be when the pistol and the AK-47 shoot the same calibre of ammo at the same rate of fire?

We've seen the video of the 2 bank robbers in california, shooting FULL AUTO at the cops....again they were CRIMINALS were talking about here.
so obviously the ban didnt keep the bad guys from getting and modifying the guns.

What did the cops do when hit with this? They went to a gun store and confiscated similar type weapons to use against the bad guys!!!! Hmmm, now if similar weapons had not been available thru legitimate means, they would have been screwed.

This law seems well intentioned, but in reality stopped NOTHING....it exempted all the legit weapons that were on the list and already in posession by law abiding citizens...(taking away no guns from anyone)

More people die from being shot with cheap pistols than rifles, let alone something like an ak-47, tech-9, or any of the flashy, expensive guns on the list.

Ill bet there are lines on monday, when the ban expires, of legal citizens trying to buy these guns and accessories.

So what are the thoughts about this law expiring?



[edit on 10-9-2004 by CazMedia]


reply posted on 10-9-2004 @ 01:03 PM by RedOctober90
Indeed!

Especially in these days you don't know when your going to be attacked by domestic criminals or international terrorists.

I was reading a Tom Clancy novel called "The teeth and the tiger" and a bunch of terrorists broke into malls and begun shooting up the place and several armed citizenry managed to somehow subdue the terrorists untill the national guard arrived and finnished them off. Of course it's only a novel but these things could happen!

I say we need more guns.. not less. Taking guns away from the citizens does not take the guns away from the criminals. I was in an argument at one time with a European who says if we keep guns in the hands of the government only there would be less crime.. all of which is CRAP. An armed citizenry deters a would-be criminal because he wouldn't know which guy would be carrying some weapon to shoot his arse when he tries to put criminal acts upon innocent people. Naturally, not everyone citizen will be carrying a gun but some will and we would be better off!

You just can't always wait for the police to arrive when the guy is shooting everyone up.. you gotta take action yourself if you can to save your people.

Why is there so much street crime in some countries in Europe especially the UK? Simply because there is no deterence against crime except the police.. and the police aren't always there to stop things at a blink of an eye. If the criminal knows some of the people might be armed.. it may deter him.

[edit on 10-9-2004 by RedOctober90]


reply posted on 10-9-2004 @ 04:18 PM by Fry2
This was my post from ATSNN on the same subject:

It would be interesting to see a poll of people who actually KNEW what the ban actually accomplished. Many in the media seem to think that the ban actually banned "assault weapons" i.e. machine guns.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ridiculous is the notion that private citizens should be able to tote machine guns? It takes someone with extreme positions like Alan Keyes to righteously argue that cause. Most Americans -- Democrats and Republicans -- are against claiming Second Amendment protections for these guns and support the federal assault weapons ban.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

www.suntimes.com...

The semi-automatic rifles and pistols that this law banned were NOT fully automatic nor capable of burst fire (pull the trigger once and three bullets come out). They are less powerful than almost any deer hunting rifle on the market and have been used in less than 1% of all gun crime in the U.S......ever.
Those on the end of the leash may be asking "Why did they ban them then!?!?!?" Good question.
Simple answer: They look dangerous!
Here are the criteria for a so called assault weapon,

Detachable magazine on a semiautomatic rifle
and any two of the following:

a folding or telescoping stock [no gun in the pack on your camping trip]
a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon [god forbid you can hold the rifle with comfort!]
a bayonet mount [Drive-by bayonet attacks must be on the rise]
a flash suppressor or threaded barrel [You MUST be blinded after that first shot by the muzzle flash!]
a grenade launcher [included to scare people, since grenades and launchers are restricted by the National Firearms Act of 1934]

and
A semi-automatic pistol with a detachable magazine
and any two of the following:

an ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip [and that makes the bullet coming out the end more dangerous?]
a threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer [you must be inaccurate, blinded or deafened]
a shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned [you must burn yourself!!!]
a manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded [because lighter firearms are "safer"]
a semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm [just because]

The law did NOTHING to reduce crime as the statistics show.
This is hardly "a win for gun rights activists". This is a case of our rights being restored and the sunset of an unconstitutional law.



reply posted on 10-9-2004 @ 04:44 PM by ShadowXIX
Originally posted by Fry2
This was my post from ATSNN on the same subject:

It would be interesting to see a poll of people who actually KNEW what the ban actually accomplished. Many in the media seem to think that the ban actually banned "assault weapons" i.e. machine guns.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ridiculous is the notion that private citizens should be able to tote machine guns? It takes someone with extreme positions like Alan Keyes to righteously argue that cause. Most Americans -- Democrats and Republicans -- are against claiming Second Amendment protections for these guns and support the federal assault weapons ban.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

www.suntimes.com...

The semi-automatic rifles and pistols that this law banned were NOT fully automatic nor capable of burst fire (pull the trigger once and three bullets come out). They are less powerful than almost any deer hunting rifle on the market and have been used in less than 1% of all gun crime in the U.S......ever.
Those on the end of the leash may be asking "Why did they ban them then!?!?!?" Good question.
Simple answer: They look dangerous!
Here are the criteria for a so called assault weapon,

Detachable magazine on a semiautomatic rifle
and any two of the following:

a folding or telescoping stock [no gun in the pack on your camping trip]
a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon [god forbid you can hold the rifle with comfort!]
a bayonet mount [Drive-by bayonet attacks must be on the rise]
a flash suppressor or threaded barrel [You MUST be blinded after that first shot by the muzzle flash!]
a grenade launcher [included to scare people, since grenades and launchers are restricted by the National Firearms Act of 1934]

and
A semi-automatic pistol with a detachable magazine
and any two of the following:

an ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip [and that makes the bullet coming out the end more dangerous?]
a threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer [you must be inaccurate, blinded or deafened]
a shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned [you must burn yourself!!!]
a manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded [because lighter firearms are "safer"]
a semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm [just because]

The law did NOTHING to reduce crime as the statistics show.
This is hardly "a win for gun rights activists". This is a case of our rights being restored and the sunset of an unconstitutional law.


I agree alot of people that talk about this ban seem to think that when it sunsets everyone will be able to run out a get full-auto machine guns.

Alot of people that think they know something about the ban will bring up grenade launcher (or flare launchers) which is all the really are. People will say I dont want people to be able to get grenades. That law does not effect anyone getting their hands on 40mm grenades they will still not be able to touch them. Grenades are tightly regulated as destructive devices, and besides when has a 40mm grenade ever been used in a crime?

I think your right its a scare tatic


reply posted on 10-9-2004 @ 08:58 PM by cavscout
Look, I respect and agree with your position, more than you could know (I personally think nukes should be legal, if that tells you anything.

The problem I see with your post is that it is so full of un-truths. If an anti-gunner sees us stating outright lies, this will do nothing but hurt our cause. Plus, anyone who is interested in guns or gun issues should be well versed, so as to verbally whip back the ignorant hordes (instead of adding your own ignorance to the fray.)

I know the laws are about to sunset, and therefore won’t be of as much concern, but that 10 year "ban" will be used as fuel for both sides of the gun debate until the day the Libertarians succeed in ridding our nation of all victim disarmament laws, so we need to remember and spread the TRUTH about those laws.

This may be harsh, but understand I do think it is great you took the stance

Originally posted by CazMedia
Full auto fire weapons have ALWAYS been banned!

No, actually they never had been banned. You have to pay $200 tax and submit to an in-depth background check as well as register them with the BATF and allow them to inspect them every now and then. This only started in the early 30's as a response to increased gun crime due to prohibition. Then, in the 1980's, they made it illegal for anyone who was not law enforcement or military to import, buy, or manufacture any full-auto weapon that was not already registered to a private person, which had the effect of raising the cost of those guns to thousands of dollars for the worst examples. The Libertarian Party presidential hopeful calls for the repeal of every gun law in existence, including the National Firearms Act of 1934 that set all this in motion.


A 9mm handgun will shoot the SAME AMMO just as FAST as the 15 guns on the list will.

Actually, a 9mm shoots 9mm. So called "assault weapons" generally shoot medium caliber rounds such as the .223 5.56mm (ar-15/m-16) or the 7.62x39 (sks and ak family of weapons) although many have been configured in recent years to fire a large number of different rounds, including 9mm. These are not common. Caliber, however, had nothing to do with law. Armor piercing rounds are much more common for such military calibers, and are actually cheap and legal.


What usually gets these guns on the list is things like type of scope, type of stock/grip, size of ammo magazine and other options, not the type of bullets or the rate of fire.

Actually, optic devices such as scopes and lasers have nothing at all to do with law. A weapon is not affected unless it is semi-auto, so rate of fire DOES get a gun on the list.


their shooting the same bullets that their more concealable handgun uses

See above.




Now i know cops,and many will say that these guns are dangerous, but how can this be when the pistol and the AK-47 shoot the same calibre

Wow, you really like to say that, don’t you?

So what are the thoughts about this law expiring?

Been waiting for ten damn years.





[edit on 10-9-2004 by cavscout]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Truth, Lies, Oil and Scotland
  Posted 19 days ago with 8 member flags
Russian cops mistake nationalist rally for gay pride parade
  Posted 17 days ago with 4 member flags
Republicans in Arizona plan to nearly wipe out public unions
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags
Tennessee threatens suit against man building boat with his son.
  Posted 0 days ago with 4 member flags
The CULT of Ron Paul
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Greetings from a Dying Man
  Introductions, Posted 8 hours ago, 66 replies
Alien Grey caught in photo ?
  Aliens and UFOs, Posted 10 hours ago, 64 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 14 hours ago, 55 replies
Iran sent pink drone to Obama
  World War Three, Posted 15 hours ago, 40 replies