It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
By a media trick, Tehran proved its claim that closing the Strait of Hormuz is as "easy as drinking water," debkafile reports. First thing Saturday morning, Saturday, Dec. 31, Iran's state agencies "reported" long-range and other missiles had been test-fired as part of its ongoing naval drill around the Strait of Hormuz. Ahead of the test, Tehran closed its territorial waters. For five hours Saturday, not a single warship, merchant vessel or oil tanker ventured into the 30-mile wide Hormuz strait, waiting to hear from Tehran' that the test was over.
Iran has proposed a new round of talks on its controversial nuclear program while apparently delaying long-range missiles tests that it had said would take place Saturday.
The state-run IRNA news agency says nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili has invited the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany (known as the P5 + 1) to "come back to talks."
Extreme fear: "people fled in terror"; "a terror of darkness". The use of such fear to intimidate people, esp. for political reasons: "weapons of terror".
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by Daedal
Maybe the US should play some mind games as well and start sinking the Iranian ships one by one until the remainder flees the area?? Then just deny any involvement!
Originally posted by ken10
reply to post by AllUrChips
US Fifth Fleet says won't allow Hormuz disruption
Guess that was just a BLUFF then
For five hours Saturday, not a single warship, merchant vessel or oil tanker ventured into the 30-mile wide Hormuz strait, waiting to hear from Tehran' that the test was over.
Originally posted by Firefly_
reply to post by seabag
So you are advocating the use of violence and triggering a war that will escalate and kill innocent people all around the world?
Originally posted by seabag
They have a barbaric culture. A country that has no problem stoning women to death for adultery and similar crimes should not have the means to kill millions at a time with nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by JessopJessopJessop
Funny. In much of the world we think the same of Capital punishment in America, lack of gay rights, child mutilation based on religious principles, animal mutilation based on nothing but convenience - we also fancy you as being religious fundamentalists too.
By most standards the United States is the most archaic and barbaric society in the Western world. Perhaps then Europe should bomb America?
Americans don't seem to understand that they have much more in common with their supposed enemies than you can begin to imagine. I suppose when you do it there's nothing wrong with it though, you're the good guys after all! Nothing wrong with declawing your cat, circumcising your child, stopping gays from getting married, stopping raped women from having abortions, putting people to death, giving people 20 year sentences for robbing a pack of chips(3 strike principle), bombing other nations, being Christian fundamentalists.
You're advanced and moral people eh. At least the Iranian people themselves by in large want change and want to be a democracy with good morals - same can't be said for many of your American brothers who seem to get off on war and theocracy.
I like though how you say "stoning women to death FOR", as if there is ever a justification for stoning or killing a person You're a moralist of dinosaur proportions aren't you ]
Originally posted by Firefly_
reply to post by seabag
Would you feel hard done by, offended, insulted, enraged, if the Iranian civilians suggested doing the same thing to the US fleet?