It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alien Grey ET on Canadian coin?

page: 3
25
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 10:51 AM
link   



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 11:00 AM
link   
reply to post by derpif
 


this is just what I see but on his original post it looked more like a Grey because it was so grainy,when I went to the site and saw it first hand -you can see it for what it is (a young person reaching into the water)



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 03:26 PM
link   
obviously a child.
amazing how the eye see what it wants to see sometimes.



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 03:30 PM
link   
reply to post by mandroids
 


We didn't have a 2 dollar coin (toonie) until 1996.



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 03:31 PM
link   
Following Canadian history would appear alien to some that don't get out much .

2nd line



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 03:35 PM
link   
EDIT:

Gah....

Blown up picture says it all.

White kid in a hoody grows up to be a American Indian in a canoe
edit on 31-12-2011 by ThinkingCap because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 03:49 PM
link   
I think it looks like a child.

I have always been fascinated by the things that
can be found on our world's currency.
This is one of my favorites:




I find it curious that it looks like water around the pyramids.
edit on 31-12-2011 by isyeye because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 04:10 PM
link   
I think he did it intentionally.

Those Canadians know what is up.

Young woman old woman illusion



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 04:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard
 


T&C Violating post removed by staff.




Why the hostility? First off no one said it's absolutely definitely without a shadow of a doubt a depiction of a Grey!

All I'm saying and what others have said is: 'we cannot see a child's head'

And now that Gortex enlarged a photo, most of us can clearly see the child.


We're not idiots. We're people who questioned what we were seeing and THAT'S the way it should ALWAYS be.



edit on 12/31/2011 by tothetenthpower because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 04:21 PM
link   
reply to post by isyeye
 


Looks like a roman legionary helmet on part of the image . nice .




posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 04:47 PM
link   
Id suggest looking at Gortex's reply...he shows a far better quality picture than the one in the OP.

Its clearly a child in a boat.

Mystery solved, anything more imo is trolling



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 05:34 PM
link   
as "Gortex" pointed out in his earlier responses to this thread when you have a higher quality picture you can clearly see it is a boy and what appears to be the "alien" left eye is the boys ear.



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 07:32 PM
link   
reply to post by gortex
 


I failed to see the boy untill this image, I do think it was meant to be a human kid rather than an alien though perhaps it could have been designed better. I bet if you were to take a photo of someone at that angle and apply some B/W effects it would give the illusion of an alien.



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 09:16 PM
link   
reply to post by gortex
 


He can officially toe the line all he wants, but that bulbous bald headed boy is wearing space apparrel and has those ET eyes. Hmmmmmmm..... Pretty obvious we're being told something.



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 09:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


excellent find.. !! S&F .. however, here's my take..

the first picture/video does not even come close to the 2nd still posted, they both look nothing alike! Yes I can see the child in the 2nd still but I completely fail to see the child in the video/1st still ..

I interpret the coin in the video that they have made contact already with

a) Canadian gov. in 2011 or ..
b) they've made contact with humans or 2011 will be the when they do..

Being in QA for a number of years, there NO way they would have let that slide unless

a) it was one of the first prints and the QA guidelines need to be tweaked to accurately reflect the 'child'
b) it slipped thru the QA line/software some how..
c) it was allowed to go ..



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 09:23 PM
link   
reply to post by mandroids
 


The toonie did not exist until the mid-nineties. Did you check the date on the coin or is that just what you were told? Also, the pic of the queen bitch has looked pretty standard on every toonie I've ever seen.



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 10:59 PM
link   
reply to post by derpif
 


That is the CUTEST little extraterrestrial that I have ever seen. He is absolutely adorable!

BTW, thanks for posting the picture so that I didn't have to download the video.



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 11:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Unity_99
 





posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 01:35 AM
link   
There is something I do not understand. Enlighten me on this please.

Honestly, how could these 2 pics be so different?
When you look at the first one on this website -
(www.mint.ca...)

you can clearly see an alien-like face and it is at a quite good resolution. Next, on the second one, the boy's face is completely different and there is no doubt this is a kid. However, there is only one set of color on this coin, black and white. So, how could the difference be so huge? Furthermore, on the second ''high quality'' image, if you look closely at the older boy, you can barely see his face wich is completely dark except his eyes that are shining white. Look back at the first picture, you can easily distinguish the older boy's traits.

So, I'm asking you guys, what's it all about?
edit on 1-1-2012 by St0rD because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 01:51 AM
link   
interesting..




top topics



 
25
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join