It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Eaglecall
What makes some people think that we are going to attack Iran by the sea?? LMAO. Of course the hypothetical US fleet destruction scenarios you guys put here are real. But those scenarios are based on a non-existant possibility. If we ever go to war with Iran, fire will rain from the heavens first in key targets. Targets that will let Iran im;possible to attack the stretch by ballistic missiles. Those targets ARE ALREADY IDENTIFIED. The WHOLE military complex of Iran is absolutely identified with pin pointed locations from space. If the green light is given, the eagles are ready to fly and deliver. After that our fleet will have open acces to approach the coast, anihilate any remaining Navy, while launching massive missile strikes towards more targets.
Some people is really innocent to under estimate the mighty power of the U.S. Military. What we have technologically speaking, is light years ahead of any non-allie. What we have in amount of warfare and manpower, is light years ahead of any non-allie.
And I just repeat that I do not support attacking Iran. If they close the stretch, yes it will affect us, but why we always have to put the face first?? I would say if it happens, lets assume the crisis and wait until other countries take the inniciative. Not us. If we need gas, let's drill. We have plenty.
Take our guys back home from everywhere. But if there is a real attack that requires our action, I am ready to enlist tomorrow.
Originally posted by Iwinder
Originally posted by Eaglecall
What makes some people think that we are going to attack Iran by the sea?? LMAO. Of course the hypothetical US fleet destruction scenarios you guys put here are real. But those scenarios are based on a non-existant possibility. If we ever go to war with Iran, fire will rain from the heavens first in key targets. Targets that will let Iran im;possible to attack the stretch by ballistic missiles. Those targets ARE ALREADY IDENTIFIED. The WHOLE military complex of Iran is absolutely identified with pin pointed locations from space. If the green light is given, the eagles are ready to fly and deliver. After that our fleet will have open acces to approach the coast, anihilate any remaining Navy, while launching massive missile strikes towards more targets.
Some people is really innocent to under estimate the mighty power of the U.S. Military. What we have technologically speaking, is light years ahead of any non-allie. What we have in amount of warfare and manpower, is light years ahead of any non-allie.
And I just repeat that I do not support attacking Iran. If they close the stretch, yes it will affect us, but why we always have to put the face first?? I would say if it happens, lets assume the crisis and wait until other countries take the inniciative. Not us. If we need gas, let's drill. We have plenty.
Take our guys back home from everywhere. But if there is a real attack that requires our action, I am ready to enlist tomorrow.
The Mighty power of the U.S. Military is quite something to behold, now if you folks could only feed your poor and house the homeless and actually provide a cheap but good education all would be good.
maybe throw in a few million jobs that pay decent...........but if that happened there would not be much left over for wars?
I don't know what made me post this as it is never going to happen......Pass the ammunition and screw the common folks.
Regards, Iwinder
Originally posted by westbound
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
"...if iran gets invaded it couuld go nuclear." So according to this statement, along with this, "Do you think it is worth having NYC and DC nuked over irans supposed nuclear weapons?" Who in their right mind would actually sit idly by and let a country such as Iran take the upper hand in a potentially nuclear situation because they felt that saving 10 million lives (just for conversation's sake) by sheer cowardice is better than risking 10 million lives (again just for conversation's sake) to save almost 7 billion that currently populate this earth? Either way, it doesn't actually matter who comes out on top, which I fully expect America will, and surely I won't be disappointed, the truth is someone needs to make sure that countries like Iran never and I repeat NEVER point any type of weapon of mass destruction at any nation in any corner of this earth no matter how small! To simply say that it's not worth saving an entire planet from a possible all out nuclear war with countries such as Iran, North Korea, and so on is utter lunacy!
Originally posted by The X
reply to post by westbound
Iran has the most advanced biological weapons capability that has been actively researched by soviet brain drain scientists since the collapse of the old soviet union.
If iran wanted to strike anybody, they would not use nukes, they would have used bio agents, far cheaper and does not leave a radar track and can be plausibly denied.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Since we have a relevant thread with the exact same tactics that are going to be played out:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Saturation attack.