This topic is in the Other Current Events discussion forum.  (rss)


So the US isn't the biggest perpetraitor of genocide?




Topic started on 10-9-2004 @ 01:16 AM by Corinthas


When I posted the news of Powell declaring the events in Darfur as "genocide" I suggested he was the most qualified to do so as he was in the employ of one of the biggest genocide machines there is: the US Armed forces.

I cant find my post any more, maybe it never made it to the board who knows.

Any way there is no refuting this statement as it has been well documented as american policy, to ensure access to resources and to gurantee "favorable investment conditions" for American capital.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-9-2004 @ 12:37 PM by PistolPete


Do you even know what genocide means? I think you meant the greatest commiter of atrocities worldwide. But that's not right either:

The 30 worst bloodlettings of the last century:
external image

Death tolls here.

We've propped up some horrible regimes like the Khmer Rouge, but to say we're the worst committer of genocide isn't really correct. What instances are you citing as irrefutable? If you're talking about Iraq, I agree we shouldn't be there. But that isn't genocide. Afghanistan? No.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-9-2004 @ 01:32 PM by Odd


The U.S. is not even CLOSE to the biggest perpetrator of genocide in the history of geopolitics.

In fact, on behalf of all those slaughtered in the bloody purges of centuries past, and on behalf of the United States of America, I take offense to the very suggestion. You're making a mockery of the millions of lives lost in Middle Eastern and African nations over the past few hundred years, and more recently of the thousands of Jewish Europeans killed during World War Two.

You might not like the USA, but that doesn't make it evil.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-9-2004 @ 03:05 PM by DJFiyaaBl8


I only know that last sentury was the bloo'dies ever



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-9-2004 @ 03:54 PM by JediMaster


Corinthas I have noticed that you blindly accuse US soldiers of being terrorists and providing no backup. I take this time to challenge you to a grudge match in the Debate Forum about this issue.

The USA does nto come even close to being genocidal. Genocide is defined as accoridng to the BBC link as.

Killing members of the group
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

Genocide is essentaily racial/ethnical murder. The US is not killing Arabs or blacks because of hatred. We are targeting Arabs since the terrorist and millitants happen to be Arab.

Communism has commited more genocide than the US.

Corinthas, name 3 instances where the US commited genocide. And even before you bring it up, slavery would not be genocide. If it was many many nations would be/have commited it. We did, the Romans, Africans, Arabs nearly every nation at one point enslaved another race.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:


























ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.096 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread