Originally posted by DaRAGEI actually think you have a point. 2.5 petabytes isn't really all that much in the grand scheme of things. Consider this:
This 1 terabyte to 2.5 peta bytes is I believe non-sense. Imagine those people who are around who do not forget anything. Not like us normal chaps who forget most things... These people don't forget anything at all. Crazy as that sounds. I would say that 2.5 petabytes of information wouldn't be enough for these people.
if your brain worked like a digital video recorder in a television, 2.5 petabytes would be enough to hold three million hours of TV shows. You would have to leave the TV running continuously for more than 300 years to use up all that storage.
Now consider that our memories aren't just sound and visual data, but also smells, tastes, and even emotional states. Furthermore, our vision is in a much higher definition compared to normal TV, although we don't typically remember things (let alone all things we see) in the same quality as we initially see them. Even if we were to store an extremely small percentage of everything we experience and learn, the amount of storage space required would be massive.
I think that we're able to keep storing new memories because the old ones are fading away and freeing up space. If you no longer need a memory, you will stop recalling that certain memory. The more you think about a certain thing, the more you strengthen the neural networks involved with those memories. In this way, we reinforce the memories that we are thinking about the most. Even so, I think the storage space of the Human brain must be at least a couple of petabytes.
edit on 30-12-2011 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)




