It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IkNOwSTuff
reply to post by Hanslune
Hey Dude,
Love this sort of stuff but unfortunately most of that article was a bit technical for me.
Any chance of getting a break down on what it all means
Certainly, Beringia land bridge and coastal entry 7, Atlantic entry 0
Originally posted by Hanslune
One idea that came up a few years ago was an attempt to explain why a certain DNA haplogroup C4c, was thought by some to indicate a connection between early Paleoindians in eastern North America and the Upper Paleolithic Solutrean culture in France and Spain.
A new study American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 147, pages 35-39 disputes this and a comment on it is here
Link
A secondary piece of evidence - that Solutrean stone tools looked like native American ones as put forth by Stanford did not find any support with Solutrean experts.
Originally posted by WatchRider
Well, it doesn't explain how the European practice of burying spearheads into the ground spread to the America's (something supporting the Atlantic Migration theory).
Nor does it explain away the Asiatic tribal history of European's arriving prior to Columbus either.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by WatchRider
Well, it doesn't explain how the European practice of burying spearheads into the ground spread to the America's (something supporting the Atlantic Migration theory).
Why is considered a European only issue? Please explain
Nor does it explain away the Asiatic tribal history of European's arriving prior to Columbus either.
Because that wasn't the point of the study, so yes it didn't do that nor did it provide a recipe for Thai style fish in red curry, lol
Originally posted by IkNOwSTuff
reply to post by Hanslune
Hey Dude,
Love this sort of stuff but unfortunately most of that article was a bit technical for me.
Any chance of getting a break down on what it all means
Originally posted by ANNED
The Clovis came in some way without leaving a trail behind. that is not normally seen in any migration
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by ANNED
The Clovis came in some way without leaving a trail behind. that is not normally seen in any migration
Let's not forget that there were no people called "Clovis". It is an artificial appellation used to organise users of a particular stone tool industry. There were people here before Clovis, and people here since. The same people could have developed the technique, then abandoned it. DNA is more of an absolute manner of tracking migration than toolmaking. Lovely tools, though.