It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by sHuRuLuNi
No I don't believe that, Genesis was written by Moses and there is no truth to be found in the Quran. God does not make cosmic “mistakes”, those who think that haven't studied the bible well enough. God does not change His mind, nor is there ever a reason for God to “repent”. You have simply misunderstood the verse and used it to your advantage to try and promote the lies the Quran. I encourage you study the bible further and you will see the light in Gods preserved truth.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by sHuRuLuNi
Big Bang is a scientific theory that's never be proven and I do not believe in it. I believe God made the universe with his word.
"Find me one - and I mean ONE - claim in the Qur'an from the field of science, math, biology, hydrology, embriology, whatever - which is not in accordance with the modern science.
The Bible accurately records actual people, places and events, the Quran is a jumbled up mess.
Here's some quotes from some scholars:
Need I go on? The Quran is a messed up fraud.edit on 31-12-2011 by RevelationGeneration because: (no reason given)edit on 31-12-2011 by RevelationGeneration because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sHuRuLuNi
Find me one - and I mean ONE - claim in the Qur'an from the field of science, math, biology, hydrology, embriology, whatever - which is not in accordance with the modern science.
Just one.
Go on. Shoot.
And We have (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven with lamps,
and we have made such (Lamps as) missiles to drive away Satans, ...
-- Sura 67:5
Originally posted by vogon42
Originally posted by vogon42
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
The problem seems to be that here you have Christians in this corner, and non-Christians and anti-Christians in that corner. ....
Actually I believe 3 of the 4 who have answered the question are christian.
And so far the tally stands at
2 - the flood was local
2 - the flood was global
I'm also very curious to know everyone point of view on the other claim about the flood.
I was told, in a post on this thread, there were only 40 animals on the arc.
How could there be only 40? That would mean there are only 20 different species of animal on this planet.
Originally posted by racasan
Originally posted by sHuRuLuNi
Find me one - and I mean ONE - claim in the Qur'an from the field of science, math, biology, hydrology, embriology, whatever - which is not in accordance with the modern science.
Just one.
Go on. Shoot.
And We have (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven with lamps,
and we have made such (Lamps as) missiles to drive away Satans, ...
-- Sura 67:5
so what do i win?
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
Originally posted by vogon42
Originally posted by vogon42
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
The problem seems to be that here you have Christians in this corner, and non-Christians and anti-Christians in that corner. ....
Actually I believe 3 of the 4 who have answered the question are christian.
And so far the tally stands at
2 - the flood was local
2 - the flood was global
I'm also very curious to know everyone point of view on the other claim about the flood.
I was told, in a post on this thread, there were only 40 animals on the arc.
How could there be only 40? That would mean there are only 20 different species of animal on this planet.
Lets take this back a few thousand years. First of all, Take all of the sea animals out. Salt water and fresh water are hard to mix, so salt and fresh water animals could have survived. Second, the land animals wouldn't be as diverse as today. Noah only needed to take one of each Kind onto the ark, back That taken into concideration, there would have been far fewer species of animals to have to carry. All dingos, wolves, dogs, and other canines would have been taken care of by one breeding pair. Once the ark landed and the animals were set free, the conditions would have been perfect for accelerated breeding. Also, genetic evidence suggests that the entire human species was brought down to a number less than 100 indivuals about ten thousand years ago, so in reality, there is more evidence FOR Noah's ark than against it.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by sHuRuLuNi
I'm not going to bother arguing with you on new years eve about the accuracy of the Qur'an. You know its a fraud just as well as I do. Just aslong as your aware the God of the Qu'ran is not the God of the bible, or the universe. So you are worshiping a false deity.
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by sHuRuLuNi
You forgot one problem. If the Flood was local, God would have repeatedly broken His promise never to send such a flood again.
Orrrrrr... "God" didn't create the flood (in the way you invision it)... and it's just a story. The only true evidence to ever surface about a flood (pun intended) came from a Tel Aviv University research team who discovered proof of massive aquatic activity in the Mediterranean Sea that "closely" corresponds with the Noah timeline. However, it is unclear if that activity was the result of a flood or tsunami, though the core sample sediments show that the waters were extremely fast moving which closely resembles the activity of tsunamis and not flooding. The affected area was massive, not unlike the massive flooding seen in the Middle East last year, but still localized.
Originally posted by sHuRuLuNi
Find me one - and I mean ONE - claim in the Qur'an from the field of science, math, biology, hydrology, embriology, whatever - which is not in accordance with the modern science.
Just one.
Can you PROVE scientifically, that meteorites on their way do not come in contact with energy or energy beings for that matter (which Jinns are)?
Your turn.
Originally posted by racasan
You said :
Originally posted by sHuRuLuNi
Find me one - and I mean ONE - claim in the Qur'an from the field of science, math, biology, hydrology, embriology, whatever - which is not in accordance with the modern science.
Just one.
ok
Can you PROVE scientifically, that meteorites on their way do not come in contact with energy or energy beings for that matter (which Jinns are)?
Your turn.
Easy – science doesn’t do jinn's or satan’s ect so I win
Muhammad is the "prophet" of Islam. At age 40 he claimed that he was a prophet and apostle (he took these terms from the Bible. They had no history in Arabian religion). The Quran gives four conflicting accounts of how he was called to be a prophet--(1) In Suras 53:2-18 and 81:19-24, Allah personally appeared. (2) In Suras 16:102 and 26:192-194 he was called by "the Holy Spirit". (3) In Sura 15:8 the angels announced his prophetic ministry; and , (4) The angel Gabriel told him of his ministry and hands him the Quran.
Who were Muhammad's first supposed converts? Genies! Yes, Muhammad supposedly preached to and converted genies in Suras 46:29-35; 72:1-28. How convenient that there was no one around to confirm his prophethood.