Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by buster2010
So you don't find anything morally wrong with Ron Paul saying he wouldn't have interfered with the Nazis despite knowing as we today what the Nazis
were doing. He would have just let the Nazis murder as many Jews as they wanted? And invade as many sovereign nations as they pleased? There's
nothing callous and isolationist about that???
Although Ron Paul is very clear he wouldn't have invaded Germany to save Germans, Jews or not, from their government (non-intervention), he also says
that in the event such a nation
starts a war against another and the Congress believes US national security is threatened because of that and
declare war upon the aggressor nation, he would enter it. He says this clearly in a video posted by
Hawkiye on another thread. So he is not an isolationist.
So quite likely he would stop Germany if Germany continued invading neighbours and the US Congress felt the actions were against US national
security.
Anyway, what's with all this Jews and Germany business. US didn't intervene to stop a genocide in Rwanda in 1994 despite having the
plans for
the genocide with them in avdance, They didn't even have to send their own troops, they simply needed to get the UNSC to authorise a force to be sent
to Rwanda and couldn't be bothered to do that. Are Jews supposed to be some special people whose lives are worth more than others' and others
supposed to die for them if some others try to get them?