It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

If 911 is viewed as a crime instead of a terrorist attack, it becomes clear...

page: 25
102
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 02:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by snowcrash911
Oh, and while you're at it, please translate this in full, and explain to the members of ATS what it says.

Then, kindly go away.

Cheers.


Bump for "Corruption Exposed" (lol)




posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 02:50 PM
link   
Just in case any of you neutral people reading this thread thought I was kidding when I stated, 9/11 Deniers - have nothing, know nothing, say nothing check the last two posts.

The boxer, boxes on...

Okay - here is an articles that everyone should read unless they are a defender of Israeli Apartheid, will not allow any mention of a connection between Israel and 9/11 or are an ideological 9/11 Deniers, which are usually one in the same.



Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu has expressly denied saying to Jerusalem Post’s editor Steve Linde that Haaretz and the New York Times are Israel’s two greatest enemies. If Mr. Netanyahu says so, we must believe him. After all we cannot join people like Hillary Clinton, Angela Merkel, Nicholas Sarkozy and a number of other world leaders who have said that Mr. Netanyahu is, let’s say, not always one hundred percent reliable.


Israeli newspaper slams Netanyahu

A person can never tire from hearing "Netanyahu is a liar" and let me ask how we could trust anyone's opinion on 9/11 who denies that Netanyahu is not a liar.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 02:52 PM
link   
Well?

We've got two crack linguists in the house, right?

What's keeping you guys?

You wouldn't want me to translate it for you, right?

This is what you call 'checkmate'.

Either you reveal your dodgy intentions by continuing to ignore this assignment because you absolutely hate to be proven wrong by your own efforts, or you actually do what I say, translate the text, and debunk yourself.

Sucks, doesn't it?

What's it going to be fellas? Stop staring down at those white laced combat boots past your Lonsdale sweater and get a move on!


edit on 19-1-2012 by snowcrash911 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 03:39 PM
link   
"Some men, you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week. Which is the way he wants it."



Have to admit SnowCrash used "crack" and "house" in the same line without really insulting anyone - which does take a certain amount of talent.

However, I don't remember anyone electing you headmaster of this thread and granting you the authority to assign homework for the rest of us.

If you do have a spare moment, though, we would like to hear your opinion on the Hebrew accent of the Jewish Israeli terrorist hijacker in question.

Will you please try to remember 20% of the linguistics you have forgotten and tell me and the rest of the kids what sort of accent your extensive education in linguistics helps you to determine it to be?

A person with your history of hearing voices should be able to knock this one out of the park.
edit on 19-1-2012 by BRAVO949 because: spelling

edit on 19-1-2012 by BRAVO949 because: snowcrashed



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 03:50 PM
link   
This goes out to Alfie, Snowcrash, and ProudBird.

Do you at least understand this language?



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 03:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by BRAVO949
A person with your history of hearing voices should be able to knock this one out of the park.
edit on 19-1-2012 by BRAVO949 because: spelling


A person with your history in spelling errors probably should have caught "cack" -which was actually "crack"- the first time, but then again, maybe it's Freudian and you're subconsciously aware of your own bovine excrement.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 03:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by snowcrash911
Oh, and while you're at it, please translate this in full, and explain to the members of ATS what it says.

Then, kindly go away.

Cheers.


Bump for "Corruption Exposed".

Come on "linguist". Do your thing.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 03:57 PM
link   
You can U2U me too if you feel uncomfortable admitting your error in public. I have no problem with that. Bigots, racists and Jew haters tend to be narcissists, and that really obstructs the necessary mourning/healing process induced by epic failure.

Let it go.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 04:02 PM
link   
reply to post by snowcrash911
 


Here ya go.


I'm not a linguist, but I'm an architect, and a marine biologist in my spare time






What do you do for a living?

I hope it doesn't involve convincing people of anything, because you're not that good.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 04:05 PM
link   
That's not what I asked you to do.

Naturally, I already know the translation. Also: I don't give out personal info to racists and neo-Nazis.

So what does it say? Please inform the forum what the article says, since it's crucial to your claim about Francesco Cossiga.

Go ahead.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 04:09 PM
link   
You don't mind if I press this issue a little bit? Since you seem to be dodging it? Just trying to hold liars to account. Relax, it'll all be okay. I might take a pause to let you talk to yourself for a little bit, looking for new desperate ways to make this thread all about Jews and Jewish issues, and post more irrelevant bunk and paranoid speculation.

When you're done ranting, I'm going to bump the question again. There is no escape.

Cheers.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 04:32 PM
link   
reply to post by snowcrash911
 


If you would like to have some serious discussion you need to copy and paste the content you would like me to comment on. You're only embarrassing yourself by spamming pointless comments. I'm more than happy to answer any questions to the best of my ability, but I'm not heading on any wild goose chases.

I provided the link to Google translate, even took the time to translate the article and read it. The ball is in your court snow, what portion of the article were you interested in discussing?

To be honest there isn't anything worthy of causing you to act like this. The topic is quite clear, we have gone back and forth and shared various pieces of evidence with each other. That's how a debate works. It's just that I'm used to seeing this whenever Israel is mentioned in possible involvement for certain crimes.

You're accusing me of avoiding a topic even though you haven't presented anything substantial. You sent a couple links, I read them, and now you refuse to point out what it is you're even talking about. I'm still waiting on your response about Netanyahu. You know that if you admit certain proven facts, you will have no choice but to at least consider Zionist involvement in 911.

In my opinion it' quite obvious they were involved, but it's not "official", especially since anytime evidence is presented certain deniers automatically derail in various manners including but not limited to ignoring the evidence, ridiculing it, and even lying about it. I'm not asking you to donate your first born, I'm only asking your opinion on Netanyahu saying that 911 was good for Israel. Why is that so difficult?

I'm more than happy to comment on that Italian article about the ex president, but what part of it would you like to discuss?



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 04:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by snowcrash911
That's not what I asked you to do.

Naturally, I already know the translation. Also: I don't give out personal info to racists and neo-Nazis.

So what does it say? Please inform the forum what the article says, since it's crucial to your claim about Francesco Cossiga.

Go ahead.



Now you're really confusing me, your portraying as if I was the one to present that article as evidence. I presented a different article in which I already explained what it's about, meanwhile you presented another article.

You need to tell me what I should find in the article you presented. I have the translated version in front of me right now. I will leave it up so I can refer to it once you point out what it is that we're supposed to be discussing.

Just in case you forgot, here is the Italian article I posted earlier:

www.corriere.it...

Hint: It's different than the article you posted



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 04:47 PM
link   
I guess this confirms the fact that you do know how do speak Yiddish.

Since you know "cack" when you see it.


Originally posted by snowcrash911

Originally posted by BRAVO949
A person with your history of hearing voices should be able to knock this one out of the park.
edit on 19-1-2012 by BRAVO949 because: spelling


A person with your history in spelling errors probably should have caught "cack" -which was actually "crack"- the first time, but then again, maybe it's Freudian and you're subconsciously aware of your own bovine excrement.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 05:46 PM
link   
You would think that based on the topic of this thread and the question about the Hewbrew accent clearly evident on the 9/11 - Flight 11 recording that a person would admit that they can speak Yiddish.

Many people ridicule Yiddish as a glorified pidgin language spoken by an underclass of rag merchants from the Central and Eastern European equivalent of the Via dei Stracciaiuoli.

The German word for underclass is "Unterschicht" by the way.

But, I don't think that Yiddish should be denigrated nor should the humble, innocent, regular pre-Zionist Jews who spoke it.

So, why would a person who speaks English, Dutch, German and possibly Yiddish not admit it directly and help us out with thier linguistic evidence related to the Hebrew accent on the Flight 11 recording.

The angry, insane, Khazar, non-Othodox man seen just after the good holy man starts talking says a few words in Yiddish for all you people who want to know what Yiddish sounds like. Some experts say Yiddish is to swearing as Italian is to opera.



Any similarity of characters in the video above to members of ATS is coincidental.



posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 10:39 AM
link   
Dear Snowcrash911,

Please don't run away. The discussion was just getting going.

Correct me if I am wrong but you stated that you had forgotten more linguistics than I know.

You are an honest person, I am sure, so please apply some of your vast remaining linguistic knowledge to the Hebrew accent that experts tell us to listen for, on the 9/11 Flight 11 recording.

For someone such as you with a solid background in linguistics, it should be easy to prove that the accent is something other than Hebrew.

I don't know what you do for a living, of course but based on your posts here I don't think you are in science or technology or a field where you have to use math every day or apply logic to problems so I would like to quote a famous physicist named Richard Feynman you probably do not know of. He was Jewish. I am not sure if he was a Zionist but here is some advice he gave to individuals in your situation.



Do not keep saying to yourself, if you can possibly avoid it, "But how can it be like that?" because you will get "down the drain," into a blind alley from which nobody has yet escaped. Nobody knows how it can be like that.


Snow, you may not want to admit that you live in a world in which Israel is the "bad guy" that lies, cheats, tortures, rapes and murders innocent Arab children in the Middle East and may have killed over 2,500 American Christians in the US but if the evidence proves it, you have to accept it.

Thank you for keeping your mind open.

reply to post by snowcrash911
 



edit on 20-1-2012 by BRAVO949 because: punctuation



posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 11:26 AM
link   
Hey--I didn't want to start a new thread with this---but this comment is coming from a gentleman I used to work with. I trust him quite a bit. Smart guy---and not one to jump on the conspiracy bandwagon. But he just wrote me and he said this about 9/11 (in response to a comment I made about NDAA) He lives in Jacksonville, Florida and has a lot of connections there:

He says this about 9/11:

"I had reason to consider it (that is was not a true terrorist attack) from the week following 911. A family member personally witnessed very incriminating activity associated with the presidential visit here in Jacksonville on 9/10 and the first lady's secret service detail on the morning of 9/11. That's about all I am willing to say here for literal fear of reprisal but I am confident in saying our government knew more before 9/11 than the public will ever know."

Not sure I want to pump him for information. We've only recently been in touch again (thanks to FB)---but it may be worth trying to check out what he's talking about.



posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 12:18 PM
link   
Thank you for your contribution, MRuss.

Every detail is important.

No single person who was not directly involved in the planning and execution of the crimes of 9/11 knows the whole story but collectively, the story is out there.

The internet allows millions of people to come together and add what they know and what they have concluded based on available information.

As anyone who has read the posts in this thread can clearly see there is a group of 9/11 Deniers on ATS that are not interested in "adding" to the body of knowledge of 9/11 research but are instead actively subtracting from it.

If you read one or two of comments of the subtractors they sound reasonable but if you read ten or more posts consecutively you can see a clear pattern of attempted destruction.

We do not have to be bullied by 9/11 Deniers and we have the right to expose them as agents of disinformation.


reply to post by MRuss
 



posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 12:38 PM
link   
I'm worried about Snowcrash, they didn't even say that they may be gone a while. Whenever I'm in a debate like this I always try to pre-warn people of my absence, out of politeness.

His opinion of that Italian news piece he presented should be interesting, I was wondering about it today on my way home actually. The page was even left up on my desktop.

Has anyone explained Netanyahu's delight in the incident yet?

I was hoping someone would have some theories as for why he would say this.

People will say the story about Israeli men with a van that detected positive for explosives is a hoax, but I find the audio of that incident very convincing. Has anyone proven this to be fake yet?



posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 12:52 PM
link   
CE,

Maybe this really is the thread were 9/11 Deniers come to die.

Not sure who said this but I think it applies, "Silence is not always golden. Sometimes it is yellow."

The 9/11 Deniers have yapped about the Israelis arrested who were associated with vans on 9/11 in New York but I don't think they have proven anything.

You are right the police recording sounds very authentic. I recall one 9/11 Denier who tried to argue about the difference between an Israeli having been detained and arrested as if that whole link between the Israeli crimes of 9/11 and how it had the fingerprints of Israeli false-flag all over it was negated by the symantics of the terms arrest and detain.

The fact that Israelis were stopped by police on 9/11 impersonating Arabs screams Israeli false-flag regardless of whether one uses the term arrested or detained.

9/11 Deniers have nothing that is why they are so afraid of this thread.


Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
I'm worried about Snowcrash, they didn't even say that they may be gone a while. Whenever I'm in a debate like this I always try to pre-warn people of my absence, out of politeness.

His opinion of that Italian news piece he presented should be interesting, I was wondering about it today on my way home actually. The page was even left up on my desktop.

Has anyone explained Netanyahu's delight in the incident yet?

I was hoping someone would have some theories as for why he would say this.

People will say the story about Israeli men with a van that detected positive for explosives is a hoax, but I find the audio of that incident very convincing. Has anyone proven this to be fake yet?



new topics

top topics



 
102
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join