It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Spheres UFO OVNI ET contact Russia, Mexico, Arizona desert 2011 year of sightings.

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 03:26 PM
link   
2011 was the year of UFO OVNI sightings. Different sizes and shapes has been seen around the world. On December 23rd, a UFO sighting in Russia was dismiss as a failure Russian rocket. But the truth is another. Spheres UFO are energy livings entities.




posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 03:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Is2012TheDate
 


Sorry but that's an overlong video of rockets , lens flare and insects or dust particles in my humble opinion



posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by gortex
 


Bingo ..

not only that but it's already been posted multiple times



posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 03:59 PM
link   
couldn´t get more then two minutes in.

in the first two minutes he made three language mistakes.

the voice is that of an automatronic.



trying agian on mute..



posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 04:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by Is2012TheDate
 


Sorry but that's an overlong video of rockets , lens flare and insects or dust particles in my humble opinion


yup you're right.

dont forget the mylar balloon @ 2 minutes in



posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 07:15 PM
link   
once it got to the balloon and described it as a living creature, that was me done.
and at the start there was lens flare.
no, this video does not hold up to scrutiny



posted on Dec, 30 2011 @ 08:28 AM
link   
I'm sorry you people in this forum are so intelligent. I'm a retarded continuing posting videos. I will close my account.



posted on Dec, 30 2011 @ 12:23 PM
link   
for what purpose did you post the video then?

for it to be scrutinized i guess?

if you wanted people to say:
OMG! this cronk of (*#@&$(*@#$ is proof of aliens you've come to the wrong forum mate.



I'm a retarded continuing posting videos


nobody said that you're just acting like a little dramaqueen right now



I will close my account


ok.



posted on Dec, 30 2011 @ 02:53 PM
link   
The government pays people like the above posters to go on forums like these for the only purpose of debunking. You must remember that dust particles and lens flares are not subject to human eyes, but to camera lenses, so how is someone going to SEE a lens flare or a dust particle and then take a picture of it? It's impossible to mistake a solid object in the sky for a lens flare or dust particle, because first you see the object with the naked eye, then you take a picture of it, so the assumption that gets thrown around here on this forum that every sighting can be reduced to that of a lens flare, dust particle or whatever is just absurd.

I know there are individuals on here that are smart enough to see past the propaganda of debunkers, for what reason they are debunking is beyond me, if they are not interested or don't believe in the possibility of aliens visiting earth, then they don't have much business here, but it appears that many non-believers of this phenomena flock here for the sole purpose of debunking. For what reason I couldn't say, it appears that this forum has long been infiltrated by an agency or group that just debunk.

But anyway this video captures a lot of great sightings except towards the end some of them do look like dust particles.
edit on 30-12-2011 by RadioactiveRob because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 30 2011 @ 03:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by RadioactiveRob
The government pays people like the above posters to go on forums like these for the only purpose of debunking. ...... so the assumption that gets thrown around here on this forum that every sighting can be reduced to that of a lens flare, dust particle or whatever is just absurd.



Pretty much this.

Notice how these guys, and not a few other, approach every similar thread with the same negative, sometimes derogatory, skepticism.

Also note how they do not bother to link these "already posted" threads, either.

Usual reply is "already been debunked", "already posted" etc etc. I would hardly call that being skeptical. Would anyone?

Can't be bothered to provide a link to the exact same material on these forums? But you can find time to discredit every_single_thread that is posted here? Ridiculous.

I'm afraid those characters have gone far beyond the scope of healthy skepticism, which I agree is necessary in making a determination if something is truly explainable, but such negative attitudes, outright rudeness and often times a complete lack of substance to their posts would indicate that they are not here to provide skepticism at all.

I won't conjecture WHY they dismiss literally every thread here, but it's obvious that they DO.

To me, that's just as big a mystery as the subject of the thread.

To the trolls above, I won't bother replying to you, so sock-puppet what you will. You guys are so obvious it's an embarrassment to whatever agenda you're playing at.

To the moderation on this forum; I thought there was some attempts being made to curtail this kind of discouragement? Here you literally have a poster that wants to end his account. From a business perspective, you're letting these "debunker" trolls destroy your website traffic.

Should I just forward this thread to your boss? This entire forum section has become a joke, due to lack of respect.



posted on Dec, 30 2011 @ 03:43 PM
link   
reply to post by yourignoranceisbliss
 


well if a mylar balloon is being passed of as a living biological entity that sures gives us the right to be skeptic.

furthermore if you find this proof of alien visitation that says more about you ´believers´ than it does about us ´debunkers´.

god i hate those words...

and believe me, when im truely stumped as to what an object might be... i´m man enough to admit it.

ETA:


To the moderation on this forum; I thought there was some attempts being made to curtail this kind of discouragement? Here you literally have a poster that wants to end his account. From a business perspective, you're letting these "debunker" trolls destroy your website traffic.


and the guy wanting to 'end' his account is just playing dramaqueen.
i agree the ATS crowd can be disrespectful at times but not in this thread.

the vid posted is a joke and quite frankly 'believers' should be ashamed this vid is being offered as 'proof'.



To the trolls above, I won't bother replying to you, so sock-puppet what you will. You guys are so obvious it's an embarrassment to whatever agenda you're playing at.


this doesn't count as being derogatory?
oh no... ofcourse not, silly me!

it's only derogatory against believers.

give me a break.



edit on 30-12-2011 by kn0wh0w because: (no reason given)

edit on 30-12-2011 by kn0wh0w because: (no reason given)

edit on 30-12-2011 by kn0wh0w because: (no reason given)

edit on 30-12-2011 by kn0wh0w because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 30 2011 @ 03:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by kn0wh0w
reply to post by yourignoranceisbliss
 


well if a mylar balloon is being passed of as a living biological entity that sures gives us the right to be skeptic.

furthermore if you find this proof of alien visitation that says more about you ´believers´ than it does about us ´debunkers´.

god i hate those words...

and believe me, when im truele stumped as to what an object might be... i´m man enough to admit it.



Originally posted by kn0wh0w
couldn´t get more then two minutes in.

in the first two minutes he made three language mistakes.



Irony much?

Have a good day. I know I said I wouldn't respond to the trolls, but I had to point out the age level of some of our posters as a possible excuse for the rudeness.



posted on Dec, 30 2011 @ 03:58 PM
link   
reply to post by yourignoranceisbliss
 


if you look at my post history it's quite obvious i'm not a troll.
so i really don't feel offended.

talking about age i see?

naming people trolls isn't exactly all grown up either.

furthermore language mistakes in a so called documentary or vid with proof are pretty annoying.
especially when the speaking voice is that of an automatron.

why don't you adress the mylar balloon @ 2 minutes in, that's being passed of as a living biological entity?
i'll tell you why.

because you just needed to vent a little.
this vid is a massive collection of hoaxes, bugs, flares, misinterpretations and so on... as pointed out by the 'trolls' above.

nothing more nothing less.
if you can't handle that fact so be it.

if you think one of us was rude or crossed the line, alert the mods.
this won't get you anywhere.



Have a good day.


same, no hard feelings



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 05:13 AM
link   
reply to post by RadioactiveRob
 




post by RadioactiveRob
The government pays people like the above posters to go on forums like these for the only purpose of debunking.

Nice way to start your time on ATS , calling other members Government paid debunkers




post by RadioactiveRob
so how is someone going to SEE a lens flare or a dust particle and then take a picture of it?



post by RadioactiveRob
except towards the end some of them do look like dust particles.

But how can someone SEE dust particles and then take a picture of it?



post by RadioactiveRob
for what reason they are debunking is beyond me

Simple .... because the video is Bunk .


post by RadioactiveRob
but it appears that many non-believers of this phenomena flock here for the sole purpose of debunking.

And you know that I am a non believer in UFOs how ?

@yourignoranceisbliss
Indeed , your name seems very appropriate.
edit on 31-12-2011 by gortex because: Edit to add



posted on Dec, 31 2011 @ 05:47 AM
link   
Sometimes I wonder about these keyboard warriors. Why are people getting so upset over a debate over the internet about UFO's and aliens? Not everyone is going to agree with everything which is posted - that would just make for a pretty boring forum but for a few people to keep making up conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory about people who debunk the phenomena its sad - if I didn't know better I'd say John Lear has returned.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join