Get Ready For A Obama-Clinton Presidential Ticket

Originally posted by poet1b

I think Hillary is going to retire. The way things are going these days, I don't blame her.

I don't know. Hillary IS politics - - unlike some of these newbies trying to jump on the bandwagon.

I just can't see her letting go of making history by being the first woman VP. And then the chance to be the first woman president.

I'm gonna go way out on a limb and say: I bet she's having some work done - - and that is why she's taking a public break. She wears pantsuits because she has rather ugly legs. Legs can be sculpted these days. Time will tell.

Hillary isn't retiring. Her aspirations for Presidency runs in her blood. The ONLY reason she wont run outright,is because she will split the Democrats,and they dont need that,especially now.

reply to post by Tippys Dad

But then again, I don't know her, maybe she's crazy.

NO "maybe" to it.

Anyone that would insist on a Christmas tree made out of hand made genitals/sex organs ornaments

is not the least bit sane in any sense that I'd want close to.

And that doesn't even begin to get into the super wild lesbian orgies at Camp David that the SSrv folks were so incredulous over.

But the worst of her craziness doesn't even touch on all that . . . but includes her absolutely

ARROGANT, CHRONICALLY ANGRY, CHRONICALLY FOUL MOUTHED, CHRONICALLY ABUSIVE tone and attitude toward all who work around her and particularly toward

"the little people."

The ones she pretends to care so much about but doesn't at all.
.
.

Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by Tippys Dad

 

But then again, I don't know her, maybe she's crazy.

NO "maybe" to it.

Anyone that would insist on a Christmas tree made out of hand made genitals/sex organs ornaments

Do you have any links or proof of any of the claims you make?

Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by Tippys Dad

 

But then again, I don't know her, maybe she's crazy.

NO "maybe" to it.

Anyone that would insist on a Christmas tree made out of hand made genitals/sex organs ornaments

is not the least bit sane in any sense that I'd want close to.

And that doesn't even begin to get into the super wild lesbian orgies at Camp David that the SSrv folks were so incredulous over.

But the worst of her craziness doesn't even touch on all that . . . but includes her absolutely

ARROGANT, CHRONICALLY ANGRY, CHRONICALLY FOUL MOUTHED, CHRONICALLY ABUSIVE tone and attitude toward all who work around her and particularly toward

"the little people."

The ones she pretends to care so much about but doesn't at all.
.
.

edit on 30/12/2011 by BO XIAN because: spelling

Proof please?

Sorry,but those are WILD accusations,and I dont even support Hillary.

reply to post by beezzer

it's not just democrats that own the franchise on progressivism.

INDEED.

However . . . I wish thinking rational folks on all sides would

AVOID being brainwashed into useing the word "progressives" or "progressivism."

It's NOT.

It's REGRESSIVES and REGRESSIVISM

all the way back to Soddom and Gomorrah and Babylon's worship of Molach or some such etc.

There's NOTHING progressive about the values nor about the actions etc.

It's akin to the DAFFYNITIONARY used when they

sold the public on the use of

INFANTICIDE = MURDER OF HELPLESS INFANTS = CHOICE

reply to post by sarra1833


I don't know if Ron Paul is honest or not.

He SEEMS more candid than average by far.

I also don't know if he is consciously complicit in being set up as a spoiler or as a Trojan Horse or if he's being set up that way without his conscious cooperation.

I do believe he is being set up to be at least a spoiler, if not a Trojan Horse.

I cannot remotely begin to believe that the puppet masters will let him any where near the Oval Office without his being chipped/cloned/controlled/ under globalist Vulcan Mind Meld control or some such.

Not in this time/space dimension.

They sure seem to be trying to blacken him out of the public awareness whenever they can get away with it. Which is interesting in itself.

I'm not comfortable with his attitude toward Israel . . . nor toward Iran for that matter.

I do like that he slices katty wumpas diagonally across lots of standard sensibilities on the right and left.

Originally posted by BO XIAN
Anyone that would insist on a Christmas tree made out of hand made genitals/sex organs ornaments

I don't find that particularly unusual.

I worked for a company that had a Christmas party for one of the gay guys. Can't remember exactly why. But we made him a Christmas tree decorated in different colored condoms and other sex related stuff.

As a matter of fact - - I was on reception duty - - and was putting a green condom on a dildo - - which I stood on the desk and it started walking across the desk - - just as a customer came in.

Out of context - - that would definitely sound bizarre.

reply to post by Annee


Hmmmmmm I suppose it would depend on the shop and the customer.

In the Whitehouse . . . NOPE.

We were still pretending we were a Judeo-Christian Nation back then.

reply to post by BO XIAN


I can't open my messages on this computer.

But I can see who they're from.

reply to post by Annee


Sorry.

I read thousands of pages of stuff that I soak up like a sponge without taking notes and even without filing links or articles except for maybe the top 5%.

However, I recall a LOT more than the top 5%.

Maybe if I had it to do over again, I'd keep better track. At 65 years old . . . I try to on the newer more useful articles . . . but a lot has gone under the bridge irretrievably.

There's enough findable of similar ilk that folks wanting to know the truth can certainly use

DOGPILE.COM

to search most such out.

I have a lot of other priorities and don't care to bother trying to track a lot of that stuff down again.

Folks can either search it out or disbelieve or whatever as they see fit.

The truth will eventulaly surface wholesale and many folks will be most shocked when they discover their faces are being rubbed vigorously in stuff they long denied.

Oh, the Secret Service stuff--most of that was from personal communication with folks whose relatives were on duty. IIRC, There were 2-4 different friends/relatives of mine who fit in that category.

There's some such available on the net. I don't recall how much.
.
.

reply to post by Annee


Was basically asking how good Pournelle's book was. I like him as an author. And maybe for a brief 2-3 line outline.

Originally posted by BO XIAN
I read thousands of pages of stuff that I soak up like a sponge without taking notes and even without filing links or articles except for maybe the top 5%.

So do I - - but gossip - - without verifiable proof - - is just gossip.

You are spreading something you heard or read - - that's gossip.

The internet is full of it.

Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by Annee

 

Was basically asking how good Pournelle's book was. I like him as an author. And maybe for a brief 2-3 line outline.

I didn't care for The Burning City - - Niven/Pournelle.

Just started Starswarm - - I like it so far.

Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by Annee

 

Hmmmmmm I suppose it would depend on the shop and the customer.

In the Whitehouse . . . NOPE.

We were still pretending we were a Judeo-Christian Nation back then.

Why not in the Whitehouse? Its also a private home.

Its not any kind of puritan sanctuary.

You think people under extreme stress shouldn't lighten up and be normal like the rest of us?

reply to post by Annee


Evidently . . .

those of my perspective have some boundaries that we are convinced public officials,

particularly in the White House

should not cross.

When they do cross such boundaries, it is a screaming signal to us that the fox is in the henhouse.

Of course, most of us knew that to begin with.

When such activities surface, it's merely outrageously greater proof, to us.

Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by Annee

 

Evidently . . .

those of my perspective have some boundaries that we are convinced public officials,

particularly in the White House

should not cross.

Are you kidding. That's ridiculous expecting them to be some kind of holier then thou puritans.

Anyone working under the kind of stress of high level politics - - - better find some ways of humorous tension release - - - or they're gonna end up in the looney bin.

Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by beezzer

 

it's not just democrats that own the franchise on progressivism.

INDEED.

However . . . I wish thinking rational folks on all sides would

AVOID being brainwashed into useing the word "progressives" or "progressivism."

It's NOT.

It's REGRESSIVES and REGRESSIVISM

all the way back to Soddom and Gomorrah and Babylon's worship of Molach or some such etc.

There's NOTHING progressive about the values nor about the actions etc.

It's akin to the DAFFYNITIONARY used when they

sold the public on the use of

INFANTICIDE = MURDER OF HELPLESS INFANTS = CHOICE

We may differ on terms but I will give a nod towards your more precise definition.