It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by UnivoxSuperfuzz
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by filosophia
A similar thing happened to bring america into war with germany. At least now the world is awake and watching their criminal acts.
The Strait of Hormuz is the only way in or out of the area. Is this not deliberate provocation by the Iranians? Iran has no special privilege to occupy or close an international waterway.
What right does AMERICA have to the Strait? If you haven't noticed we're on the opposite side of the globe and Iran is right next to it.
And it's none of OUR business what's going on in the area. It IS Iran's business as it has extreme military and political implications for them. Jesus, these blind fascists just don't know when to stop.
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Violater1
With the sub on the surface, I agree.
Just a bit of chest beating.
That picture was taken years ago and does not reflect the current makeup of a Carrier Strike Group. Further, there is ALWAYS a carrier in the region, and 75% of the time there are two. The USS Abraham Lincoln is headed that way now and either is already or soon will be on station in the same area. Since Stratfor is down my usual source of info is unavailable for the moment.
In other words, this is normal. No one needs to get their panties in a twist unless a third carrier shows up. It is theoretically possible that the Vinson could be diverted to the area. If that happens (not saying it will or is even contemplated), then it's pretty well guranteed that something is up.
A carrier has more firepower than 90% of the world's air forces. It could single-handedly gain air superiority over Iran within 24 hours. Iran is no match for a Carrier Strike Group. The "chest beating" here is being done by Iran. No carrier is going to get sunk by an old torpedo or some crazy guys in an inflatable.
Originally posted by Violater1
Here is a photo of the USS Stennis and the rest of his posse.
This has D.F.W.M. written all over it.
"a snails pace" ?? That's just wrong. A submerged attack sub can easily outrun an aircraft carrier which is capable of about 45 knots at WOT. you need to get your facts straight.
Originally posted by star in a jar
To people making comments about the submarine being on the surface... The submarine has to be on the surface to be at its full speed... otherwise the ships on the surface would have to keep pace with the submarine going along at a snails pace underwater.
Originally posted by star in a jar
To people making comments about the submarine being on the surface... The submarine has to be on the surface to be at its full speed... otherwise the ships on the surface would have to keep pace with the submarine going along at a snails pace underwater.
Originally posted by METACOMET
reply to post by star in a jar
Not to mention that Iran still has the f14 tomcats we gave them and Phoenix air to air missiles with a 120 mile range. The AMRAAM's the US uses have a range of 30-40 miles.
Originally posted by star in a jar
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Violater1
With the sub on the surface, I agree.
Just a bit of chest beating.
That picture was taken years ago and does not reflect the current makeup of a Carrier Strike Group. Further, there is ALWAYS a carrier in the region, and 75% of the time there are two. The USS Abraham Lincoln is headed that way now and either is already or soon will be on station in the same area. Since Stratfor is down my usual source of info is unavailable for the moment.
In other words, this is normal. No one needs to get their panties in a twist unless a third carrier shows up. It is theoretically possible that the Vinson could be diverted to the area. If that happens (not saying it will or is even contemplated), then it's pretty well guranteed that something is up.
A carrier has more firepower than 90% of the world's air forces. It could single-handedly gain air superiority over Iran within 24 hours. Iran is no match for a Carrier Strike Group. The "chest beating" here is being done by Iran. No carrier is going to get sunk by an old torpedo or some crazy guys in an inflatable.
Iran has advanced surface to sea missiles that can light up an aircraft carrier, these missiles are so fast that the Phalanx gun system will not have time to lock on the target and fire.
The RAM program is designed to provide surface ships with an effective, low-cost, lightweight, self-defense system which will provide an improved capability to engage and defeat incoming antiship cruise missiles (ASCMs)
Originally posted by bladerunner44
Originally posted by Violater1
Here is a photo of the USS Stennis and the rest of his posse.
This has D.F.W.M. written all over it.
This is a staged photo from a US Navy archive shot done for promo purposes. It's probably not the Stennis and the Carrier Groups as it's called would not be in such a tight formation. More importantly, the attack sub would not be on the surface. The strait is an international waterway a close would be an act of international provocation by the Iranians and should engender an international response
What has Iran done to deserve economic sanctions?