It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Indellkoffer
Err... we always did. Women who were chattel didn't -- they went from being daughter to wife without a blink. The rest of us had the same chores and responsibilites as men -- AND we had to deal with childbirth and other things that men didn't.
No man likes being treated as an oversized child -- well, women don't either. We like to have control as well; partnerships.
Y'know, I was homely as a girl -- everyone made fun of me for being ugly. Wasn't delicate, either. But I'm darn good with animals and teaching science, and you can't teach chemistry and science and mince around in fragile lace and so forth. Science teachers have to be pretty brave and straightforward -- because you may be walking kids through a dangerous experiment (I've done this) and you have to think quick.
Manicures were the last thing we worried about.
We were angry because they paid men more than they paid women for the same work, same experience, same degrees.
I'm sure you can find a nice traditional girl.
I've been married 38 years, and my husband loves that when he's tired or stressed I can take on the bills or whatever. He hates car shopping, so I shop for cars. He loves that I have a wild sense of adventure and plan interesting and unusual trips for us.
"Pretty and delicate" lasts only so long. If that's your career move, then your life is over at 40 (or after a few kids when everything starts sagging and the gray hair comes in.)
No one was ever fascinated by an ordinary woman. Extraordinary women (like Cleopatra, who wasn't that beautiful but who spoke seven languages and was a military tactician, high priestess, and a number of other things) are fascinating to intelligent and powerful men.
A man in Mensa (married to a woman with a higher IQ said to me "having an ordinary woman is like walking down a lane with a cow. It's a pleasant trip, and you get to your destination. Being married to a woman with a high IQ is like traveling that same route on a race horse. You're not always sure who's in control -- but oh, what a ride you'll have and what things you'll see!"
Me and my husband... we have a more interesting life than most folks our age and income level do.
Originally posted by Indellkoffer
Err... we always did. Women who were chattel didn't -- they went from being daughter to wife without a blink. The rest of us had the same chores and responsibilites as men -- AND we had to deal with childbirth and other things that men didn't.
Originally posted by korathin
1) Men are not more violent then women
2) Men on average are merely capable of more destruction when we do become violent.
3) Suppose some guy was being attacked by his wife or gf, what do you think would happen if he tried to defend himself? Heck dozen of guy's have ALREADY DIED IN POLICE CUSTODY from injuries from their wives and gf's, while their wives and gf's didn't have a scratch on them but the police didn't want to arrest them and had to arrest some body!
Add in the fact that WOMEN ARE MORE LIKELY TO USE WEAPONS AND BLUNT OBJECTS, and it is plain to see why people view feminist, female supremacist's the way we do.
Feminism is an out an out hate movement no matter how you dice it.edit on 31-12-2011 by korathin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Frira
Persons in human form who have no empathy, no sense of right and wrong, and no contrition for violent destructive acts-- are NOT human. That may mean YOU-- so get over it-- everyone knows anyway.
Originally posted by Frira
Are you not angry for me and for my children?
If you are not-- you are not human.
Originally posted by quietlearner
Originally posted by Frira
for example its hard to believe that feminists activists and lobbyists conspired against you
also its hard to believe that a judge would grant custody of kids to a woman who tried to kill them
its just that you describe yourself to be this gentle soul and your ex-wife to be a deranged abusive and dangerous person. Then the feminists come lobby against you and take everything from you while protecting your ex-wife from any accountability.
to be honest I just don't fully buy your story and i can't help to wonder if you are not using selective memory
I mention this because in terms of this thread topic you mention feminists are dangerous and sub-human but your reason for saying so does not seem to be all coherent
Originally posted by quietlearner
Originally posted by Frira
Persons in human form who have no empathy, no sense of right and wrong, and no contrition for violent destructive acts-- are NOT human. That may mean YOU-- so get over it-- everyone knows anyway.
I think you are calling me a sociopath and I don't think I'm one but reading your story I think your ex-wife might be one, that might explain her actions and careful planning.
Originally posted by Frira
Are you not angry for me and for my children?
If you are not-- you are not human.
I get angry when I see injustice but more than anger is sadness
Its obvious that you have went through alot and seems like its still not over and you are rightfully angry
reading your posts I did see some points that are hard to believe.
for example its hard to believe that feminists activists and lobbyists conspired against you
also its hard to believe that a judge would grant custody of kids to a woman who tried to kill them
its just that you describe yourself to be this gentle soul and your ex-wife to be a deranged abusive and dangerous person. Then the feminists come lobby against you and take everything from you while protecting your ex-wife from any accountability.
to be honest I just don't fully buy your story and i can't help to wonder if you are not using selective memory
I mention this because in terms of this thread topic you mention feminists are dangerous and sub-human but your reason for saying so does not seem to be all coherent
well I hope you telling us your story did help you like you mentioned previously
Originally posted by Aeons
Originally posted by quietlearner
Originally posted by Frira
for example its hard to believe that feminists activists and lobbyists conspired against you
also its hard to believe that a judge would grant custody of kids to a woman who tried to kill them
its just that you describe yourself to be this gentle soul and your ex-wife to be a deranged abusive and dangerous person. Then the feminists come lobby against you and take everything from you while protecting your ex-wife from any accountability.
to be honest I just don't fully buy your story and i can't help to wonder if you are not using selective memory
I mention this because in terms of this thread topic you mention feminists are dangerous and sub-human but your reason for saying so does not seem to be all coherent
None of this is hard to believe. These same things happen to both genders.
I happen to believe you because I've seen this stuff happen to both women and men. And then seen people like the ones on this thread try to eat them with their self-righteous utopian fantasies where they cannot imagine that manipulative psychos can make themselves likable victims. Or the level of destruction these people inflict.
I know a guy who literally tried to shoot his daughter and wife, and didn't spend a day in jail and was continued to be granted access to the daughter he did it to, with support from some other men. He was stopped by his son.
They did the wrong thing, because they believed the wrong person, including the judge. Even in a "zero-tolerance" mode. The guys that supported him did it because they were fools, and where they were not fools they loved their doctrine more than they loved real people.
Then these people come out of the wood work and continue to pile onto the real victims. Compassionately you understand. Just to "help" you.
Doctrine over humanity always fails.edit on 2012/1/1 by Aeons because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by quietlearner
Originally posted by korathin
1) Men are not more violent then women
2) Men on average are merely capable of more destruction when we do become violent.
3) Suppose some guy was being attacked by his wife or gf, what do you think would happen if he tried to defend himself? Heck dozen of guy's have ALREADY DIED IN POLICE CUSTODY from injuries from their wives and gf's, while their wives and gf's didn't have a scratch on them but the police didn't want to arrest them and had to arrest some body!
Add in the fact that WOMEN ARE MORE LIKELY TO USE WEAPONS AND BLUNT OBJECTS, and it is plain to see why people view feminist, female supremacist's the way we do.
Feminism is an out an out hate movement no matter how you dice it.edit on 31-12-2011 by korathin because: (no reason given)
Its proven fact that men are more prone to violence also its proven fact that men are less capable of empathy
of course there are exceptions if you compare extremes like in anything else.
...Straus and Gelles found that in couples reporting spousal violence, 27% of the time the man struck the first blow; in 24% of cases, the woman initiated the violence. The rest of the time, the violence was mutual, with both partners brawling.
The results were the same even when the most severe episodes of violence were analyzed. In order to counteract claims that the reporting data was skewed, female-only surveys were conducted, asking females to self-report, and the data was the same.
but this is already well known from studying the human brain and the effects of sex hormones such as testosterone. This is also no surprise if you think about how humans evolved. The man was usually the one to go hunting for food which requires body strength and a fighter mind, while the women stayed back with the children
btw I wasn't defending feminists actually what I've been saying is that the feminists movement seems to be switching from useful and needed to out of touch and harmful
Originally posted by Aeons
There are many areas in the World where women and children suffer from laws and traditions which are directed only at them.
Originally posted by Aeons
Having people working specifically on their behalf is not a terrible thing.
Originally posted by Aeons
It is also not what most feminists are working for.
Originally posted by Aeons
There are many areas in the World where women and children suffer from laws and traditions which are directed only at them.
Originally posted by Aeons
Having people working specifically on their behalf is not a terrible thing.
Originally posted by Aeons
It is also not what most feminists are working for.
Originally posted by Aeons
reply to post by quietlearner
You like incapable women. That's a fetish, that you confabulate with biological imperative.
It's just your personal preference.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
reply to post by Frira
I have no doubt that you are telling the truth about your ex-wife, but I have to ask you - why in the world would you stay with this monster for 16 years????? Why would you have multiple children with her??? Why did you never press charges when given the opportunity???? I have seen this in the reverse, with women in abusive relationships, and it just boggles my mind. The very first time anyone ever committed a violent act towards me - I am out of there so fast it WILL rattle your teeth.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
reply to post by Aeons
So, staying in an abusive relationship is what holds our society together? That is the craziest thing I've read yet on this site (and I've read some crazy stuff). No one should EVER stay in an abusive marriage. If a spouse is mentally ill - fine - let them get help first. If they're ok once they are on meds, then you can go back to them if you so choose.
I just have trouble having sympathy for someone who stays in such a relationship day after day, year after year, then moans about how awful they had it. And I have said as much to a woman friend of mine who was in an abusive relationship for 5 years before she finally ended it. My mother and her siblings grew up with an abusive father, and they BEGGED their mother to leave him. She refused for some strange reason, and now her children all have some form of mental health problems as a result of having to grow up in such a volatile environment. Now you tell me again how that holds our society together??