The only authentic UFO video I have ever seen, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 12:51 AM by ZeskoWhirligan
reply to post by RevelationGeneration



No, I received a degree in physics 30 years ago, and I just registered on this site tonight, and you just met me.

I'm not saying you need a physics degree to spot a hoax. As a marketing communications director, I spotted it as soon as I read the title of the thread. The guy says "this is the only authentic UFO footage I've ever seen"... Okay, I IMMEDIATELY know he's either inept or he's trolling/hoaxing.

Probably hoaxing.

Marketing instinct calls it a fake, and the OP knows it. There. That what you want?


reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 12:53 AM by Violence
reply to post by ZeskoWhirligan



You could have just cut the crap and got straight to the point. It's obvious to anyone and everyone.

Rocketman7 is that your youtube account? 'rdavm'?
edit on 29-12-2011 by Violence because: (no reason given)


Originally posted by Rocketman7
SO ok I am hearing a lot of naysayers.

So then why is there not a single copy of the original quality anywhere, yet the washed out copy is easily found?


Would you not think quality of a video is paramount when showing someone a UFO video?

So why would anyone wash it out so the details are not distinguishable then post and not even say it was totally washed out of detail?

Here it is in youtube...



Ummm.. let's see.. because that's the only copy at all.. there is no better quality than fake?
edit on 29-12-2011 by Violence because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 01:04 AM by ZeskoWhirligan
Originally posted by Violence
reply to
post by ZeskoWhirligan



You could have just cut the crap and got straight to the point. It's obvious to anyone and everyone.


What? You got an appointment? You can't have a pleasant discussion?



reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 01:09 AM by Rocketman7
Originally posted by yourmaker

for one, it's the exact replica of the generic "flying saucer". are you seriously telling me you believe they would look exactly like that? and that this guy filmed it? PLEASE.

the guy filmed the background and added it after. 100%, any normal person would have zoomed in.


Well thats a good point, that you and I would have zoomed in. Under normal conditions that would be the logical thing to do.

We might after we took the video say to ourselves, WHY DIDN"T I ZOOM IN??? lol

Maybe he was busy peeing himself and just trying to hold the camera steady as if his life depended on it.

Or, it was a staged event. And the release of more information than was given was not permitted.

Or perhaps he was not familiar enough with his camera to work the zoom at a time like that.

If this is the only video of a UFO ever released to the general public, even God was involved in its release.
Seriously, after all the attempts to find evidence and a million disinfo videos and fakes of all variety on all levels one video makes it through, yeah, it was all scripted by God. It would have to be or else there is no God, or else God just pays no attention to the earth at all.

If there is a God, and if he ever paid attention to earth at all, yeah, he would be involved in the release of a video of a flying saucer that was not of this earth.

Since its the only proof in exostence that earth is not the only place where intelligent life exists in the universe.

And it is sketchy proof at best. Even the hi res original, with the plasma, from a real objective point of view, so ok, real authentic video shows up and we know its authentic because you can't fake plasma at that time but 10 years later you can?

Maybe some mad sceintist could ten years before and never told anyone.

You see its a strange thing that reflects the nature of reality. Reality itself never wants to be held down.

It always wants to be flexible enough to change its mind.

Like quantum world vs Newtonian. A Newtonian world cannot change its mind and God cannot play dice.

In a quantum world, God can change his mind whenever he wants. And today people landed on the moon, but tomorrow they really didn't.
Like that.
Thats the true nature of reality.


reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 01:18 AM by flexy123
Rocketman,

it's not our task to "prove" or "disprove" whether it's a real UFO - but we can make assumptions about how likely it is to "fake" something we see - plus we can look at hints in the footage which would indicate a fake or support the theory that it's a fake.

It's like the old saying: If it looks like a BALLOON, flies and drifts like a balloon, has the same color like a balloon...and there is nothing indicating otherwise, there is a HUUUUUUUGE chance it actually is a balloon.

If there is footage which obviously can be EASILY faked, and then has several (!) obvious suspicious signs it might be fake - it's simply a significant higher chance it being fake and not "real".

For the footage you posted, it would not even need CGI (in fact i dont think it's "modern CGI")...but very simple tricks like using a half-mirror to "overlay" some "UFO" (model of a UFO filmed etc.) and compose it into the other footage. (This is how they did it BEFORE everyone and their mama had high-end computers).

The "UFO" footage would be on a mirror (half mirror) and then filmed through it the pre-made footage of the landscape.

I am saying this since your video has several signs:

* It just "feels" as if the UFO is not part of the whole scene but somehow filmed as an overlay to the scene.
* That shaking at 6s is almost a dead give-away.
* Camera movement not consistent with UFO movement
* The UFO stays more or less STEADY horizontally throughout the whole picture, but the camera shakes in relation to the ground <---- 100% dead giveaway it's fake.

If the camera shifts and shakes making the horizon shift and bounce around..why does the UFO not follow this movement? If this were a real object it would show the same movements....its movement is totally independent of the camera shake/ground/trees etc. It's 100% a fake and a bad one even.
edit on 29-12-2011 by flexy123 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 01:27 AM by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by Rocketman7



So what you're saying is that the video we are seeing is crap, but there's a really great original you can't show us that would be definitive proof. Ok, gotcha. Let me know when you find the one with the cool plasma please. And why would you not have a copy saved of the ONLY video you ever found that was definitely a UFO?


reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 01:35 AM by Rocketman7
Originally posted by flexy123
Rocketman,

it's not our task to "prove" or "disprove" whether it's a real UFO - but we can make assumptions about how likely it is to "fake" something we see - plus we can look at hints in the footage which would indicate a fake or support the theory that it's a fake.

It's like the old saying: If it looks like a BALLOON, flies and drifts like a balloon, has the same color like a balloon...and there is nothing indicating otherwise, there is a HUUUUUUUGE chance it actually is a balloon.

If there is footage which obviously can be EASILY faked, and then has several (!) obvious suspicious signs it might be fake - it's simply a significant higher chance it being fake and not "real".

For the footage you posted, it would not even need CGI (in fact i dont think it's "modern CGI")...but very simple tricks like using a half-mirror to "overlay" some "UFO" (model of a UFO filmed etc.) and compose it into the other footage. (This is how they did it BEFORE everyone and their mama had high-end computers).

The "UFO" footage would be on a mirror (half mirror) and then filmed through it the pre-made footage of the landscape.

I am saying this since your video has several signs:

* It just "feels" as if the UFO is not part of the whole scene but somehow filmed as an overlay to the scene.
* That shaking at 6s is almost a dead give-away.
* Camera movement not consistent with UFO movement
* The UFO stays more or less STEADY horizontally throughout the whole picture, but the camera shakes in relation to the ground <---- 100% dead giveaway it's fake.

If the camera shifts and shakes making the horizon shift and bounce around..why does the UFO not follow this movement? If this were a real object it would show the same movements....its movement is totally independent of the camera shake/ground/trees etc. It's 100% a fake and a bad one even.
edit on 29-12-2011 by flexy123 because: (no reason given)


I totally disagree with you.

The camera shaking is completely independant of the disk movement. He keeps the disk somewhat centered in the film which is good.

Where the disk jumps or bounces, in that segment a frame was reversed when the video was edited.

It was purposefully altered to discredit the video.

The disk itself is behaving according to the laws of physics. Physics that can only be replicated by CGI.

No mirror trick can reproduce physics. No simple graphics program with someone doing things by hand can reproduce physics.

But this is not CGI.

A studio like Industrial Light and Magic would use bluescreen or
green screen and it would be a piece of cake.

But they could not fake the plasma.

Anyone can reproduce Billy Meir videos, even the Three Stooges when they were filmed, had better special effects with less equipment.

This is not a Billy Meir type video. This is something that was probably meant for people who are highly skilled in physics and able to understand exactly what they are looking at.

No fancy bells and whistles, just a craft that uses electro-gravitics.


edit on 29-12-2011 by Rocketman7 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 01:35 AM by Violence
reply to post by OccamsRazor04



I think this is what he reckons happened to the original he had.

Originally posted by Rocketman7

So no one has the original?

You mean I have to search my boxes of crap in my closet for this video ony to find I threw out those CD's years ago?




reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 01:47 AM by Rocketman7
Originally posted by Violence
reply to
post by OccamsRazor04



I think this is what he reckons happened to the original he had.

Originally posted by Rocketman7

So no one has the original?

You mean I have to search my boxes of crap in my closet for this video ony to find I threw out those CD's years ago?



I have the video on disk.

Why am I the only one?

This here is one of the preeminent places in a world of 7 billion people where people search for the truth of UFOs.

So why am I, of all people, the only one with the original copy of the video which shows the plasma?


reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 01:49 AM by Rocketman7
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to
post by Rocketman7



So what you're saying is that the video we are seeing is crap, but there's a really great original you can't show us that would be definitive proof. Ok, gotcha. Let me know when you find the one with the cool plasma please. And why would you not have a copy saved of the ONLY video you ever found that was definitely a UFO?


Oh I probably can find it, the question is, why am I the only one who has it?



reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 03:37 AM by Rocketman7
Originally posted by bluemooone2
My first impression was `totally fake` and I think that is caused by the flat , two dimensional look that the saucer seems to have. After viewing this now many many times I am no longer sure either way. I really want to see your unwashed out footage OP.


Well I just spent an hour looking for it, found what I think was it, from 10 years ago on disk, and it uses an IV4 intel codec, now defunct, won't load on my computer, installed Quicktime, won't use the codec, and I have every codec pretty much except Intel Indeo 4.

I have a hundred codecs on my pc. I have the KLM codec pack and like I say everyknown codec pretty much but not the INtel Indeo 4.

I know I have the intel indeo 4 codec on an old CD that came with my old VAIO laptop from 8 or 9 years ago but do I really want to spend all day tomorrow, trying to find and load that codec, only to find it will not work anyway or, its not even the right video?

I could spend days and days and at every turn, get nowhere.

Such is the nature of the beast.

I could give you the raw file and say hey, its a small file if you have the codec play it, but then guess what? It will be an old fake video from the same time, that somehow got into the same folder as it, and somehow got mixed up with the original.

You see I am experienced. I am aware. I know what I am dealing with here.

I am dealing with a subject, where, some how many 60,000 reports of UFOs in a single year can get reported and not a single one verified as anything more than lights in the sky or swamp gas.

A subject where top military officials and astronauts, have sworn they have seen them with their own eyes, and not a single shred of evidence.

A video, which shows plasma under it, and yet, many many copies of it on the net washed out so it won't, show the plasma!

You make sense of it if you wish. Such is this world we live in.

Anyone, who thinks man is not under the thumb of some higher power is a puppet.
Any free thinking man or woman must by now know, that only things which are permitted to happen, happen in this world.

You know if I am willing to spend enough time and work through all the crap, I can get this video uploaded to youtube.

I will need to make 4 separate accounts probably before I am finished. I will need to upload it 7 times until it does it in hi res.
I will need to convert it 3 or 4 times into various formats until I find one that it will accept without removing the plasma.

I know because I have been down this road before.

Thats why I was really hoping someone here just had the frickin thing in their own damn archive. lol


reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 03:43 AM by Violence
Apparently this link has the codec you're after?

codec


Oh wait, you probably don't have the file anyway, because you wrote a bunch of excuses after your first excuse about not having the codec. My bad.
edit on 29-12-2011 by Violence because: (no reason given)
edit on 29-12-2011 by Violence because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 29-12-2011 @ 03:51 AM by bluemooone2
reply to post by Rocketman7



I would really appreciate the effort here. I know of one other video that was so high deff and breathtaking It was immediately said to be CGI and a very obscure videographer claimed credit for it although , as far as I can tell all he ever filmed was African wildlife, no CGI work at all really. Since then all copy's of the high deff version of that video have also been disappeared.
Anyway I would really be glad if you can find the codec.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Armed drones now flying over the US
  Posted 13 days ago with 118 member flags
FBI Agent Fleeing Massive Manhunt Warns "They\'re all insane."
  Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
The USA has plenty of oil....we\'ve been saving it.
  Posted 8 days ago with 11 member flags
Alien Hologram Ring, 100% bonafide alien tech
  Posted 5 days ago with 4 member flags
Hey Guys Did You Know There\'s No Such Thing As Aids ?
  Posted 9 days ago with 3 member flags
App used to make ghostly apparitions in photo [HOAX]
  Posted 16 days ago with 2 member flags
Reptililan Shapeshifters: Are these videos genuine?
  Posted 9 days ago with 2 member flags
Ace Baker proves No Planes at WTC.
  Posted 7 days ago with 0 member flags