|
reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 07:59 AM by pennyforyourthoughts
|
Thats not what I didn't get.
I'm favoring the RGB values of the pixels at the coordinates 417,333
may be true.
I found the same RGB levels
But I must say I got different HSL
The first picture pixel 417/333
H: 254
S: 24
L: 43
and its color code is #696281
second picture
H: 12
S: 17
L: 57
color code #98837E
Third picture
H: 217
S: 28
L: 49
color code #816C95
[edit on 13-9-2004 by pennyforyourthoughts]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 09:01 AM by frayed1
|
I have a question. Are we focusing on the wrong picture??
Look in the blue colored area at the top of the second photo (the out of focus one, showing the orbs diving down into the canyon.) There is a small
figure in the upper edge of that area.... or am I seeing things??
Not sure about the location of this 'hallucination' of mine--pixel wise, but it's close to the area that I thought someone said was the 417/333
pixel area on photo number one, but they're not exactly framed the same. Would some one check it???
(I also posted this question on the original thread, page 29 at the bottom with the photo, hope that's not a no no?)
[edit on 13-9-2004 by frayed1]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 09:37 AM by pantha
|
I'll have a closer look at that frayed and let you know if I can see anything.
I too am thinking along the same lines as tjack. I'm getting the same figures at that pixel on the three images.
It's the only way that I can think of that we can get three numbers from those coordinates. I'm going to mess around with those numbers tonight and
see if I can make anything of them.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 10:43 AM by tontsum
|
I noticed that in the document it is written "the three members at coordinate 417/333 ". Notice that coordinate is in singular. The coordinate is
417/333. This idea of using the resulting number was also mentioned in the original thread so this could be the one that HA was talking about. So what
to do with 1.(252)? A thread number (number of threads could be an axis)? Or a letter number?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 11:10 AM by Kellter
|
Ton, I think it says "Three NUmbers." A few other people noticed that also.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 11:28 AM by zsandmann
|
G. FOLLOW UP: IN THE EVENT THERE ARE UNACCOUNTED IMAGES RELEASED IN THE WILD, THE THREE NUMBERS AT COORDINATE 417/333 WILL PROVIDE THE
RESOLUTION.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 11:37 AM by tontsum
|
Sorry, I watched the pictures a little more closely could be either N or M, and the second letter isn't E.
But it still has coordinate, not coordinates. A whole letter couldn't disappear.
[edit on 13/9/04 by tontsum]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 11:59 AM by zsandmann
|
Ask and you shall recieve:
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 01:33 PM by Cutwolf
|
*sigh*
[edit on 13-9-2004 by Cutwolf]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 02:39 PM by Irma
|
I believe we are on the right track with what the 417/333 will mean, however I reckon we are thinking about this issue too soon. On the original
document (see above) it does say ' in the event there are unaccounted images released in the wild.......'. Since this document came after the three
images in this game, maybe these coordinates relate to the next image????
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 14-9-2004 @ 03:12 AM by Fiorina 161
|
co-ordinats
on this page: terraserver.com,
41733-3426, zip code, gets you ,
somewhere next to, Cornettsville,KY
there a sat pic, it's got hills.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-9-2004 @ 06:17 AM by Fiorina 161
|
well...
late last night , i did a search on
4/17/03,
took me here,
www.abovetopsecret.com...
under Location , it said " Hiding right in front of you",gave a link to this Avatar,
and had the words Mettle Tester, above the link.
did a search on "Mettle Tester" , and the link from the search did weird thing to my ats logon,
really don't know if this is anything, but had to try,
good night..
[edit on 14-9-2004 by Fiorina 161]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-9-2004 @ 02:02 PM by mags
|
I think the 417/333 is indeed pointing us in a general area on the original picture. If you look closely there is the 8 with the light blob next to
it, which you can find two peaks to the right also. I think the numbers there are 833 or possible 833. should we use the keyboard relatioinship
4-rfv 1-qaz 7-ujm 3-edc 3-edc 3-edc? Does anyone still have these original files :
41 qaz - 35 tgb
73 edc - 13 edc
33 edc - 43 edc
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-9-2004 @ 02:18 PM by pennyforyourthoughts
|
As we stated in the original thread, they can still be found at drjim's directory. (although they cant be seen in the index.html page)
example:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
[edit on 14-9-2004 by pennyforyourthoughts]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-9-2004 @ 02:25 PM by markjaxson
|
I see what your getting at Mags...
41 qaz - 35 tgb
73 edc - 13 edc
33 edc - 43 edc
But i have looked at these images and cannot find any relevance.
417/333 i have ALL of the original images zipped(WINrar) at 136kb so i could send it to anyone who requires the images,just U2U me with your email
address.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 01:13 PM by mags
|
ok last night I had a thought... 417/333 will lead us to three numbers that will provide the resolution. Well the 3 numbers (I'm thinking the RGB
values R-105 G-98 B-129) could (I'm not sure how) be leading us to manipulate the resolution of the image...possibly to reveal the hidden numbers in
the photo. Just a thought, since this whole thing has centered around pics and manipulation of the pic...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 04:21 PM by Azaz3l
|
Here are some more numbers you can get from 417/333:
dec: 417
hex: 1a1
oct: 641
bin: 1 1010 0001
dec: 333
hex: 14d
oct: 515
bin: 1 0100 1101
Please note I did not seperate the numbers (4-1-7), but took them as the complete number (417).
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 04:25 PM by frayed1
|
Mags,
That had been my thinking earlier. I have tried sharpening, lightening,contrasting, inverting, mirroring, color saturating, grayscale, and even
printing the separations, but my software is not cutting edge. The grayscale looked the most promising, but not much better than the originals.
I even get a different set of values for the pixel at 417/333. Once again, my software may make a diff, or my monitor?? ( I tried them all in a
multitude of ways---zip)
Someone in the first thread put forth the idea that DrJim's photo #1 was already doctored to remove the shadows that were in the original (the
timmerica pic)--hence the pasted in area at 417/333. If that is true, would it make a difference reguarding the value of the pixel???
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 04:33 PM by Irma
|
Just posted this in the 'did you find this yet' thread.....Sorry for the repeat...
Should the pixels be counted along from the left then down or along from the left then up??
If its along then up the rgb values for the three images are as follows....
#1 55 109 195
#2 90 138 212
#3 65 123 204
Sorry if this confuses the issue even more!!!
Just to add, the colour sat these pixels are...........
#1 376dc3
#2 5a8ad4
#3 417dcc
[edit on 15-9-2004 by Irma]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-9-2004 @ 05:15 PM by pennyforyourthoughts
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |