Guantanamo to reduce inmate rights, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 28-12-2011 @ 06:53 PM by v1rtu0s0
Is that even possible?

The new commander of the Guantanamo Bay prison is seeking to impose significant restrictions on the communications allowed between the lawyers and inmates at the US military base in Cuba.


Under the new rules, a “privilege team,” which includes the Department of Defense and law enforcement officials, would conduct a security review of all communications between the lawyers in Washington and the prisoners at the military base in the southeastern corner of Cuba.

The lawyers, however, argue that such measure is unnecessary and overly intrusive, since they all have security clearances and are aware of not releasing classified information.



The International Red Cross inspectors and the released detainees alike have described various acts of torture, including extensive use of waterboarding, sleep deprivation, beatings and confinement in small, cold cells.

According to Amnesty International, of the 173 men currently detained at Guantanamo Bay only three had been convicted under a military commission system, "which failed to meet international fair trial standards."


It's not right to hold people indefinetly without trial (you know, like the NDAA gives them the ability to do). If these people are terrorists, then put them on trial and prove it. There must be evidence of their guilt if they were put there in the first place....

Wait, most aren't guilty...

These people were rounded up for allegedly being "terrorists," but if you don't believe the official 911 story, then you see who the true terrorists are...

So much for Obama closing Guantanamo and giving the prisoners trials...


(Source)
edit on 28-12-2011 by v1rtu0s0 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 28-12-2011 @ 07:11 PM by Q:1984A:1776
reply to post by v1rtu0s0



Why was it that President Clinton was almost impeached, lying? Obama has repeatedly lied about several issues, and there has not even been a peep about impeachment... Not to mention the various human rights violations and treasonous bills that he has shown his support for...
I wonder how his supporters can give their backing to such a lying, conniving, weasel of a politician.
edit on 28-12-2011 by Q:1984A:1776 because: grammatical error

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 19 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 4 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 14 days ago with 26 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 7 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 13 days ago with 23 member flags
US judge blocks indefinite detention of Americans
  Posted 12 days ago with 21 member flags
Ron Paul, Adam Smith Push To End Indefinite Detention Of Americans
  Posted 12 days ago with 20 member flags