posted on Dec, 28 2011 @ 05:59 AM
I have this to say. Although it is well publicised that Muslim "honour" killings occur, it has by no means, been proven that this incident is one of
those. Families get destroyed by thier own with regularity, if not great frequency, and the families it has happened to have been white, black,
yellow, tan, nearly damned orange, and have had every faith and upbringing from Christian conservative to hippy liberal.
The truth is, unless the man who committed these acts, happens to have stated for the record that he believed his actions to have a religious
motivation, or unless he committed such thoughts to paper, or in any other recordable format, then the investigators would be dead wrong to believe
it, and so would anyone reading this thread, or indeed the article it relates to. Unless there is some forensic evidence that could point toward an
honour killing, this is just the same as any other man flipping out and killing his family.
The man massacred his entire family, and regardless of ones politics or religious affiliations, or ones obsession with hating on a minority target,
the facts as described in the article sound much less like the MO of an honour killer, and far more in tune with the behaviour of a psychopathic, who
has lost control of his family. To make an assumption, that just because the man was a Muslim, means automatically that his actions constitute a
religiously motivated action is bigoted, retarded, foolish, and will lead ultimately to an inaccurate conclusion in 99% of all ones dealings with the
Just because a person has dark skin and listens to rap, does not mean he owns a gun. Just because a person is white and has a shaved head does not
mean he is a skinhead thug. Just because a man is a Muslim, and murders his entire family does not mean that his actions amount to an honour
Nuance, detail.... that is what is lacking from the thinking here. Wake up , open your eyes and see the punctuation in the poetry of life.