It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Violence
So the OP posts a thread yesterday stating that they wish people wouldn't put up stupid threads?
Yet posts this thread saying the pictures are crystal clear, when in fact they are not. They're blurry. You post them from a website which is in a different language. I didn't read all of the replies to this thread, so maybe someone translated it, but what if the website claims they are fakes and we're wasting our time here trying to debunk it?
Originally posted by weavty1
Originally posted by nawki
Originally posted by Phage
According to the EXIF data the original dates of the images were March 22, 2010. All three within 4 minutes of each other.
They were then saved again on May 25, 2011 using Photoshop, all within two minutes of each other.
The use of Photoshop itself doesn't really mean anything but the fact that the dates are wildly different is a bit...odd. Add that the file names seem to contain yesterday's date, I'd give it a big H.
edit on 12/27/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Photo's shot on 22nd 2010, 3 shots of trees with 135mm, but waited over a year to post manipulations. very odd time line for hoax... pretty good one so far... but that's a stretch of time even for a junior CGI artist.
But just as odd if they are real, why would you wait a year to crop and release these?
3rd one has a bit of a "video game" look to it.. perspective doesn't quite mesh... interesting... to say the least... anyone with any further insight ?
Please read the whole thread prior to posting comments such as this one, being that I clearly distinguished that soon-to-be 'fire' of a false assumption.
This is my response to that original thought: "Ps, if I may add, the exif data from the third photo, particularly the date, doesn't mean anything because it goes by the date/time that you have your camera set to. It could very well be newer, or possibly older - So we can't just base thoughts or opinions on just that date alone.. Just a little FYI for those that aren't photog-savvy"
Originally posted by Violence
So the OP posts a thread yesterday stating that they wish people wouldn't put up stupid threads?
Yet posts this thread saying the pictures are crystal clear, when in fact they are not. They're blurry. You post them from a website which is in a different language. I didn't read all of the replies to this thread, so maybe someone translated it, but what if the website claims they are fakes and we're wasting our time here trying to debunk it?
Originally posted by Violence
So the OP posts a thread yesterday stating that they wish people wouldn't put up stupid threads?
Yet posts this thread saying the pictures are crystal clear, when in fact they are not. They're blurry. You post them from a website which is in a different language. I didn't read all of the replies to this thread, so maybe someone translated it, but what if the website claims they are fakes and we're wasting our time here trying to debunk it?
Anyone for a translation.... someones working on it I'd imagine. Probably the best to wait for translation...
Originally posted by Toxicsurf
With the advances of digital photography and photo manipultion, I dont think we'll ever know when a true other~worldly craft is photographed. Yes UFO pics will show up just by the true definition of the acronym....
But clear pictures? How does that happen with the distortion around the crafts due to the antigravitational fields as a result of the propulsion system?...
Originally posted by nawki
reply to post by pot8er
Hence the saying ... "nobody is ever gonna believe this.. "
Just unfortunate, that they haven't designed a software program to discover edits... simply scan the image with software bam... hoax or no hoax...
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by nawki
Anyone for a translation.... someones working on it I'd imagine. Probably the best to wait for translation...
Or....
go back a page or two and read it.