It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ANNED
The Republicans want to do it for a pipeline and the Democrats do it all the time for wetlands, critters, and there pet projects.
Both parties do it so you are out of luck in trying to just blame the GOP.
i have seen where a county built a new road and the road cause a spring to backup water on a persons land and the democrat treehuggers then called the area where the water backed up a wetland and took away the property owners right to use the land (and water) without even paying for the land. at lest the pipeland people will pay for the land under eminent domain.
there are many cases where the democrats have taken land or the right to use the land without paying a cent for the property.
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by Indigo5
Do you even know what a condemnation suit is?
It is precisely to determine the value of the land, decided by a jury of your peers.
If the court and jury permit it, Thompson and the others will be paid "fair market value" for the use of the right-of-way, and any impairment of access or loss of value to the remainder.
Why do people post here without any idea of what they are talkimg about except their own biased prejudices?
jw.edit on 24-2-2012 by jdub297 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ANNED
The Republicans want to do it for a pipeline and the Democrats do it all the time for wetlands, critters, and there pet projects.
Both parties do it so you are out of luck in trying to just blame the GOP.
TransCanada has threatened to use disputed eminent domain powers to condemn privately held land, over the owners’ objections. And that’s creating unusual allies — Occupiers, Tea Partiers, environmentalists, individualists — united to stop TransCanada from threatening water supplies, ancient artifacts, and people’s basic property rights.
They continually called me, like once a month or whenever they felt like it. Kept the pressure on us. Made us an offer, $9000. Whatever the offer was, we just don’t want the damn thing on our property.”
That’s when TransCanada really stepped up the pressure.
“In July 2010, we got a written letter from TransCanada, they told us if you don’t accept this within 30 days, we’re going to immediately start eminent domain proceedings against you,” Thompson said. “They didn’t say anything about a permit. I tried to contact the Governor’s office. All I got back was a form letter talking about the pipeline.”
The letter goes on, “While we hope to acquire this property through negotiation, if we are unable to do so we will be forced to invoke the power of eminent domain and will initiate condemnation proceedings against this property promptly after the expiration of this one month period.”
The result: protests in Paris, Texas against the pipeline, on Crawford’s behalf.
“You could check off 20 different kinds of boxes, politically, professionally, temperamentally,” Crawford said. “We had Occupiers, Tea Partiers. This is about rights as a landowner.”
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by Indigo5
Do you even know what a condemnation suit is?
It is precisely to determine the value of the land, decided by a jury of your peers.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
"Eminent domain" is used all over the place. We see it in cities too, and some cities will use it in the event of an "eyesore" that has nothing to do with infrastructure needs.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Ok, so what do you do if someone holds out and says no you can't build you pipeline here, or no that road can't go here, or that subway can't pass my 100' by 100' piece of property?Do you make huge squares around all these lands? Do you pay a king's ransom as they holdout?
Originally posted by ANNED
The Republicans want to do it for a pipeline and the Democrats do it all the time for wetlands, critters, and there pet projects.
Both parties do it so you are out of luck in trying to just blame the GOP.