is there such a thing as a non-religious oriented war?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 26-12-2011 @ 12:59 PM by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by rubbertramp



Well, in my opinion, you cannot affect anything by attacking the bottom of the pyramid. To me, that's just a waste of time. I don't intend to push that belief on anyone but that's just the way I see it. I'm open to reason , but very jaded at this point. War changes alot of things. It just pisses me off how well-perpetuated the myths of war are. I don't mean to take it out on any individual but it does happen. Apologies for any offences that may have been had throughout any of my posts in this thread.


reply posted on 26-12-2011 @ 01:45 PM by rubbertramp
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to
post by rubbertramp



Well, in my opinion, you cannot affect anything by attacking the bottom of the pyramid. To me, that's just a waste of time. I don't intend to push that belief on anyone but that's just the way I see it. I'm open to reason , but very jaded at this point. War changes alot of things. It just pisses me off how well-perpetuated the myths of war are. I don't mean to take it out on any individual but it does happen. Apologies for any offences that may have been had throughout any of my posts in this thread.


no problem. no ofense was taken, i just wanted to know what you actually meant.
i do fully understand your pov, but, like the present day wars, i do lay a bit of blame on those fighting them, not just the politics, religion, resources that are the reason for the wars.
i'd say some enter the war on a few different reasons.
family tradition.
killing muslims, who so many still believe want us dead on a general basis. not just the extremists but all.
etc....
what ever the reason they go to war, most are clueless about the true reasons, which i think are numorous.
resources, control of babylon, establishing dominence in the region, protection of israel etc....
if those fighting the wars would wake up and see the big picture than maybe less would be available as cannon fodder.
tptb could not get us into the wars if there wasn't so many willing to fight said wars.


reply posted on 26-12-2011 @ 02:15 PM by NOTurTypical
reply to post by rubbertramp



I'd say a huge majority of wars are launched because of the lust for money, not religion.


reply posted on 26-12-2011 @ 02:27 PM by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by rubbertramp
Originally posted by theRhenn
reply to
post by rubbertramp



Incorrect. The Civil War was definatly fought for other reasons than religion. Cotton to be the main reason. Succession from the union by the southern states... Even slavery would be a reason before religion when you're speaking about the civil war.


i'm not arguing any of what you just said.
i'm only adding that what we are not taught is that the 2 different sides were 2 different sects of christianity.
did you read the link i provided above?
from the beginning of this thread i have not argued points like you just made.
only that there is more to it.
there is definately entities that get people to war with each other, but it's those who do the warring that are usually divided by religion.


So what? The question of the OP was NOT whether or not people with religious affiliation participate in wars, but if there have been any wars fought that haven't began/originated because of religion. Huge difference. Christians may have taken part in the Civil War, but that doesn't mean by default that the war was fought because of Christianity.


reply posted on 26-12-2011 @ 06:09 PM by steveknows
reply to post by rubbertramp



WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam weren't religious wars and the wars we're in today are viewd as religious only by the Islamic fundamentalists.

We've always had conflict that's why we have a word for peace. I think the only thing that will reduce (but not stop) humans fighting is a world government which itself would have an army to take on any rogue State. Alot of the big thinkers of the past have thought this as well. Or we find ourselves with a common enemy but where are you going to get one of them? An alien attack (which will most likely never happen) would be the only thing to stop us fighting each other.
edit on 26-12-2011 by steveknows because: Typo




reply posted on 26-12-2011 @ 07:27 PM by wildtimes
Wars have been fought since the beginning of mankind. In the early times, clear up until, say, the 7th, 8th centuries CE, many wars were fought for territory between feudinig neighbor tribes. Some were agrarian in nature, others were warriors by nature. Some wanted to stay put, others wanted to roam around. In my understanding, wars were often based on simply wanting access to the hunting grounds, fertile valleys, good fishing, sheltered areas, where people could safely build their homes and raise their children.

In my opinion, religion was often a handy "excuse" to incite the zealous to slaughter entire peoples (Romans against the Celts, Saxons and Danes, Angles, Germanic tribles... but the underlying desire of those waging it was to take over the territories they wanted for the space and the resources, and to eliminate competition.

So petty kings fought petty kings, and boundaries and allegiances changed around for centuries, until a Big king with more arms and soldiers came along and rounded them all up. Then neighboring big kingdoms or empires or dynasties said "hey! Look what those guys got! We can take them out, though, and make those petty kings over yonder our governors, but take a huge portion of their product for our own in "taxes". Let's go!" The Roman empire came to the British Island to attain lands for the Emperor. In order to get the land, they had to get rid of the inhabitants.

Also, don't forget the Trojan war....all for a pretty lady. Right?

Anyhow, wars are fought for all kinds of reasons, some of them simply bad character in a powerful guy who wanted more and more and more and more......for himself. Others, yes, were started to keep a crown in a certain family, or to gain access to fertile areas where there were more game animals, water, milder climates, etc.

It wasn't until the invaders discovered the "abhorrent" ritual practices of those who lived in the places they wanted to conquer were different than their own that they could also claim, "And you know what else? They are savages who worship the Sun (or whatever)!! Oh noes!! Isn't that appalling? Let's Kill them all!"

And then, the aghast masses and the reluctant-to-fight-and-kill were more inclined to "support" the war. On grounds of disgust.

Things are really not much different now than they have ever been. We just know about what's gong on, when in ancient times and early modern times, no one knew what was going on except the warlords and the vanquished. They might hear stories from traveling merchants about warring tribes of giant blue-eyed savages. But until those guys showed up, it was all sort of surreal.



edit on 26-12-2011 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Truth About the Garden of Eden Story
  Posted 8 days ago with 49 member flags
The Mormon Church is a Cult
  Posted 11 days ago with 23 member flags
Google Earth proves Muhammad-Islam
  Posted 1 days ago with 22 member flags
Where is the gospel of jesus?
  Posted 2 days ago with 18 member flags
Who killed the prophet Muhammad? A 1400 year old murder mystery.
  Posted 16 days ago with 16 member flags
Quake Reveals Day of Jesus\' Crucifixion
  Posted 3 days ago with 12 member flags
Is The Bible Real?
  Posted 19 days ago with 9 member flags