It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

We should scour the moon for ancient traces of aliens, say scientists

page: 3
41
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by ALEXANDROS69
Why wouldn't we? I still don't understand why we have not built a space station right on the moon.


It makes one really wonder if we were indeed warned off the Moon like many have stated.





I've always looked at space exploration as a "relay race" Why couldn't we have space stations on several moons. Then figure out a "bullet" to shoot ships between the moons, refueling then out to the unknown.

We spend to much money killing each other over who's delusional religion is less delusional.

Can you imagine how much further in space the world would be if the US didn't spend 500 trillion on war?

Pathetic!




I don't think the PTB have any desire to further us along anymore than we currently are.
War is money. And as long as we have all our 'cool' gadgets to occupy our minds then: 'who cares?!'


Finding artifacts on the Moon means the jig is up and there would be no more pecking order. The Elite/PTB would lose their toe-hole at the top of this gigantic humanoid pyramid scheme of theirs and we would all become equals.




posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 03:33 PM
link   
They won't find anything. Why? Because there are no aliens. Alien bacteria maybe, but something capable of mining? Right, that fits right up there next to the so called cigar shaped ufo ship thats crash landed on the moon that some so-called astronaught named Rutledge claimed he saw.

If it looks like a turd and it smells like a turd, well it must be a turd.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 03:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien

I've been told by a few credible sources


Who are they? I want to make my own determination as to their credibility.


that once 'we' find irrefutable artifacts on the Moon, 'they'll' have no other choice but to acknowledge intelligent extraterrestrial life.


"They" will have dozens of choices only one of which would be any kind of disclosure.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 04:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by MahmoudAhmadinejad

Originally posted by StratosFear
Supposidly there is a ship or craft thats been on the darkside of the moon for a very long time and several secret apollo missions were launched for that purpose, The movie apollo 18 is based LOOSLEY on that


The ship is supposed to be the vehicle that actually towed the moon into position around the earth (Which is why we have a perfect tidal environment and eclipses)

Also, don't bother with Apollo 18. I was REALLY looking forward to that film and it was so awful. Transformers: Dark Of The Moon also had a minor connection to it (strangely both films released this year).



Aww i was kind of looking forward to seeing it, i had just started reading into the subject(apollo18-20, operation moonblink, etc) when the movie was annouced. I dont know about the moon being towed into position, that would be one hell of a ship wouldn`t it?



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 05:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by Pervius
 


JAXA had only what was called a webcam, resolution of 100 km per pixel.



Who would create a +Billion dollar satellite for their country to send to the moon and only attach a $25 web cam attached to it?



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 05:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Interesting, doesn't Paul Davies trust his ASU colleagues?

And Robert Wagner, responsible for "image evaluation and assessment" in the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Science Operations Center? Doesn't he trust his own team, or does he know something that we do not?



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 05:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Illustronic
JAXA had only what was called a webcam, resolution of 100 km per pixel.
No, HD the video camera was from NHK, a Japanese television network.

JAXA had other cameras (and other sensors) doing their work. Yesterday I downloaded a Terrain Camera photo with a 7 metres per pixel resolution. I think the whole Moon was photographed at a 10 metres per pixel or better resolution.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 06:00 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 06:33 PM
link   
I know inside my heart that there are bases on the far side of the moon. No agency will release the high definition pictures of the far side of the moon. Try and ask them, I did, and they are not able to disclose the pictures at this stage.

There are bases on the moon - you can do your research, you might "believe" it too :-)



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 06:39 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


hey ArMaP - quick question:

Do you have any images of the Moon you believe to be "unexplained" at the least or something more "intelligent" at the most?

Cheers fella!



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 06:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
reply to post by ArMaP
 


Do you have any images of the Moon you believe to be "unexplained" at the least or something more "intelligent" at the most?

Cheers fella!


There are plenty, if you do the research you will find many photos, but be careful:

The problem is that space agencies from Japan, US, EU, do NOT release the high definition pictures (!!RED FLAG!!) of the moon. We are only left with low resolution pics, which can only show HUGE artifical structures. Most bases on the moon are on the far side, never visible from earth (where potentially most activity would take place). There is also a HUGE tower on the moon, 2.5Km.

However remote viewer have seen the bases, and a few people have told they've seen the pictures before modification by the NASA (or destruction) in the photos lab.

I contacted the Japan agency team and they will not disclose the high resolution pictures of most parts of the moon until later date.

For me this is the breaking point: why not show us the better pictures?



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 06:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by pascalt
I know inside my heart that there are bases on the far side of the moon. No agency will release the high definition pictures of the far side of the moon. Try and ask them, I did, and they are not able to disclose the pictures at this stage.

There are bases on the moon - you can do your research, you might "believe" it too :-)


I have done quite a bit of research on this subject and come away with no evidence whatsoever that would lead me to irrefutably determine that moon bases did or do exist.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 06:48 PM
link   
reply to post by pascalt
 


Pretty much summarizes the question of questions that NASA never seem to answer eh?



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 06:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
Do you have any images of the Moon you believe to be "unexplained" at the least or something more "intelligent" at the most?
Unexplained? Sure, I have seen several things for which I cannot find an explanation that I find good enough, so I classify them as "unexplained". One of those is the one that shows what looks like a lozenge; it could be a trick of perspective, but I'm not convince of that.

Another one was taken on the surface by the astronauts, one that shows what some people call a "pipe", because it really looks like a piece of round pipe.

But there's probably more, these are the ones I always remember.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 06:49 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


PIC or it didn't happen


C'mon show show!!



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 06:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by pascalt
I contacted the Japan agency team and they will not disclose the high resolution pictures of most parts of the moon until later date.
Which high resolution pictures are you talking about? The higher resolution images are the ones from Kaguya/Selene's Terrain Camera (I have at least four at 7 metres per pixel), and they are available on their site.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 06:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by pascalt

However remote viewer have seen the bases...


Remote viewing is all too often not performed in controlled, scientific settings. Like my friend and colleague...

Dr. Courtney Brown - Moon CRV

Don't trust RV in any form unless you understand it, know what setting is was performed (among a myriad of other qualifications).



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 07:04 PM
link   
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow
 






Both available on zorgon's site, here and here, respectively.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 07:09 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 



Oh yeah baby!

*skeptic hat on: could the 2nd image be a spent rocket compartment? As in like when they used to crash the used Apollo to hit the moon (which "rang like a bell for hours")?

The 1st one is a wooah momma moment eh!

Cheers ArMaP



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 07:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
reply to post by ArMaP
 


PIC or it didn't happen


C'mon show show!!




I think this whole idea is just a ploy to further discredit what is really on the Moon.
Besides........ all the good stuff is on the dark side anyway



new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join