It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

We should scour the moon for ancient traces of aliens, say scientists

page: 2
41
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 08:03 AM
link   
reply to post by angus1745
 



It seems a bit odd to me that no privately funded moon landings even by unmanned craft have ever occurred or been attempted.


It seems odd that you don't follow the news. There is literally a race going on between private companies all over the world:

www.googlelunarxprize.org...




posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 08:17 AM
link   
I know that here on earth scientists have begun to use infrared satellite images to detect buried signs of ancient civilization We have the Themis camera on board the Mars Odyssey spacecraft. Could the two be combined?





posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 10:25 AM
link   
I see all these images taken from the surfaces of the moon and of mars but I can only see rocks in the images suppose to be of objects. It seems to be liking looking at a cloud , I could tell you what I see but it doesnt mean that objecis fliating in the sky . Am I missing something ?



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 10:48 AM
link   
reply to post by johnb1981
 


I suspect what you're missing John is imagination, and possibly spectrometer geological signature readings.
Just a guess.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 12:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by strafgod
Im not going to hold my breath on someone finding anything. Why would any alien race see our moon as a place of interest out of all the other places in the solar system? im not knocking the idea of searching the moon, it never hurt to look.


 
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
 




That's some very narrow minded logic. That's like the first person discovering lobster and saying 'that's way too ugly to be anything good to eat'

If you think of our Moon as a spaceship, which has been proposed by countless people then it isn't too hard to imagine why aliens are interested in it.

And even if it's not artificial, maybe it's centrally located in a very desirable part of our galaxy. So maybe it's being used as a depot.
I mean really?....what the hell do we know? We don't even know what came first: the chicken or the egg!

We're really just a bunch of naive Neanderthals with diplomas!
edit on 26-12-2011 by Human_Alien because: spelling



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 12:06 PM
link   
double post
edit on 26-12-2011 by Human_Alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 12:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


The egg obviously came first!



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 12:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by jazzguy
your current government doesnt give a hoot about space travel, and until nasa is dismantled and destroyed there will be no space missions.



I agree there probably won't be any space missions by us (USA) so we're looking for this discovery via China, India and/or Russia (or whoever else is in a race to the Moon).

Like I said earlier, I'm not sure how this came to be (whether it was remote viewed or advanced knowledge) but, once China (or whoever) finds artifacts on the Moon, the truth about alien visitation/intervention will be revealed. This supposedly is to occur before or near the end of 2012.
I heard about this in 2009. So it's interesting to read articles like this now.

But on a more cynical side, it really won't matter if we find irrefutable proof because without the endorsement from our government, the masses won't believe it anyway. And if we all (as one Race) don't embrace it, it will further divide us.
So.......we can find the Pleiades Plaza and a Martian Marriott on the Moon, but if it's not acknowledged by the Powers that Be it ceases to be true.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 12:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


The egg obviously came first!




And here the wisest philosophers and smartest scientists have been on life long quests searching for this answer and all they needed to do was log in here


Thanks illustronic. I'll get the memo out tout de suite



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 01:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


I disagree as our robotic spacecraft are currently doing an excellent job of exploring our solar system while the Kepler space telescope is also making some of the most important discoveries ever regarding future targets for exploration outside of our solar system.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 02:12 PM
link   
Why wouldn't we? I still don't understand why we have not built a space station right on the moon. I've always looked at space exploration as a "relay race" Why couldn't we have space stations on several moons. Then figure out a "bullet" to shoot ships between the moons, refueling then out to the unknown.

We spend to much money killing each other over who's delusional religion is less delusional.

Can you imagine how much further in space the world would be if the US didn't spend 500 trillion on war?

Pathetic!



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 02:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


I think that its a good idea to search our moon for artifacts or life. Why go to mars when the moon is alot closer.

Apollo 13 went to the moon and experienced strange events (even tho the new movie takes it alittle too far)

I think that if NASA puts some money into it with a FULL DISCLOSURE many people will accept them and actually believe what they say.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 02:44 PM
link   
reply to post by ALEXANDROS69
 


Allocation of monetary resources. How do you propose to get such resources to the moon without money that can only be accumulated by a country's mass of taxpayers?



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 02:53 PM
link   
reply to post by wlasikiewicz
 


People that don't use NASA data for astrophysical study have no better source, or are not serious scientists. Name one space agency that isn't more cited as a source of data than NASA. Area 51 is a fantasy. It's a simple AF research facility, nothing out-worldly, with a nice big dry flat salt lake bed for landing experimental aircrafts. There is such a thing as security to prevent further 'intellectual property' from being leaked to the wrong people, a lesson learned in the mid 40's during the Manhattan Project.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Illustronic
 


ummmm.....

Can you imagine how much further in space the world would be if the US didn't spend 500 trillion on war?

did you read the entire post, or ADHD out and decide to leap before looking?



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 03:02 PM
link   
War sucks. I'm not a proponent of allocating so much monetary funds to defense, especially today when wars simply cannot be won.

However defense is my paycheck, mind you, I never mentioned offense.
edit on 26-12-2011 by Illustronic because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 03:06 PM
link   
Reply to post by Human_Alien
 


"that's some very narrow minded logic."

If we are going to compare discovering lobsters with alien artifacts on the moon, then the moon must been seen as a grain of sand in an ocean of potential places where said artifacts may be found.

Trust me, ill be jumping with joy if something is found, im just not gonna hold my breath.




 
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
 


edit on 26-12-2011 by strafgod because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 03:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by StratosFear
Supposidly there is a ship or craft thats been on the darkside of the moon for a very long time and several secret apollo missions were launched for that purpose, The movie apollo 18 is based LOOSLEY on that


The ship is supposed to be the vehicle that actually towed the moon into position around the earth (Which is why we have a perfect tidal environment and eclipses)

Also, don't bother with Apollo 18. I was REALLY looking forward to that film and it was so awful. Transformers: Dark Of The Moon also had a minor connection to it (strangely both films released this year).



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 03:12 PM
link   
They could start by releasing high resolution images of the moon to the public.


US/Russia/India/Japan/China all have taken high resolution images of the moon with their satellites....not 1 country has released high resolution images of the moon to the world.


The low resolution images Japan released were atrocious. You could take the same quality images with a $99 Kmart Telescope with a digital camera duct taped to it.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 03:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Pervius
 


JAXA had only what was called a webcam, resolution of 100 km per pixel. The primary mission was to altimeter a 3d mapping of the moon's surface, at a resolution of 10 meters per pixel, there is no SELENE camera that took very close photographs of the moon. The NASA LRO has actual photography at 0.5 meters per pixel. You ain't gonna get any better than that for under a billion dollars. Save up and stay thirsty my friend.

Believe what you choose.

With a bit of help not from me, all of the images are accessible from the internet, none better than the LROC.



new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join