posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 08:33 PM
This is LOL-worthy if it weren't for the War for resources justifications.
We attacked Iraq and Afghanistan based on lame excuses, and they were NOT a credible threat, and now someone thinks there is a reason to attack
From now on, we should have 12 members of Congress and the Senate sign any declaration of war -- not for the approval process, but as people WILLING
TO DIE FOR THEIR COUNTRY. If 12 Congress people and Senators are not willing to die for this cause -- then why the Hell are we willing to have
American troops, or even mercenaries much less the inevitable wedding party mistaken as enemy forces in Iran?
>> For one thing; Iran has been FIGHTING al Qaeda for years. The CIA has been funding them since 9/11 in Iran, because they are anti-government.
Al Qaeda had more training and planning going on in South Florida than Afghanistan or Iran -- or maybe everything has been a lie...
... even if Iran was 100% involved in 9/11 -- it's diplomatically a FREEBIE at this moment. We've been to the well to many times on 9/11 and after
killing an estimated 100,000 to 1.5 million in Iraq, and displacing 2 million -- I think the DAMAGE of terror balance is on our account. Maybe this
alleged "al Qaeda" isn't a CIA/Saudi op -- and MAYBE they intended to retaliate against Canada. Using the new USA rational -- they get a "do
over". We've killed more people in Pakistan with drones than were killed on 9/11 -- isn't it "terror" to anyone getting bombed?
>> Didn't anyone tell these a-holes in the Pentagon that two wrongs don't make a Right? This would be the third one. At some point, you guys are
going to lose credibility [can you tell I'm being sarcastic?]
And for anyone out there who still doesn't think 9/11 was allowed to happen or made to happen on purpose -- it sure is the enablement program for war
profiteers. Iran certainly isn't the threat to the planet that the USA has been, nor have they invaded countries in the past millennium.
I seriously don't want a "rebuttal" from any Pro-nuke Iran person. I don't think we can have a debate with insane people. Where exactly is the
middle ground between; "wars for resources where we wipe them out" and "not going to war because the excuse is bogus"? Do we only kill half the
If the Pentagon wanted to destroy only half the world, would a compromise be one fourth of the world?
I think I'm the war-mongers are putting everyone sane in the "support's al Qaeda camp." Because they are bat # crazy and not supporting this
nonsense probably instantly makes everyone an enemy of the state.