It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ron Paul Is The Dirtiest Most Negative Campaigner Of All Republican Candidates

page: 7
11
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:11 PM
link   
reply to post by The Sword
 


because this isnt just a UFO and paranormal board....

ATS has always been highly political.....you should have been around for the last election....




posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:11 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by ManBehindTheMask
 


True.

But it would be great to make it so the political B.S disappears. I know you can hide forums that you don't wish to view but from my experience, it's only temporary.



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:16 PM
link   
reply to post by The Sword
 


obama is a bought and paid for whore . i a m sorry to hear you drank the media kool aid . without doubt is was propaganda coup
to even compare that puppet to a man of values AND long constitutionalist voting record is way of the mark



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:18 PM
link   
reply to post by WilliamWallace
 


Oh, but they're both POLITICIANS.

The words "honest" and "politician" do not go together in the same sentence.

I guarantee you that RP will find plenty of resistance to his "change", much like Obama did.



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by layzerbeem
reply to post by NOTurTypical
 


You wont get anywhere as an independent, but RP stands for true republican constitutional values and we cant look down upon the candidate for his party, that's a tool to further subvert our intentions. We need to look at where hes going with his policies and view points. Forget the party system, we need to fix this mess!


No, no. You need to stop looking at candidates as part of 2 parties. You'll hear people bemoan that Obama's fiscal policies and stances aren't that different from GWB's. Well duh!!! Obama and Bush may be Republican and Democrat, but there are not Conservative VS Liberal. The last "conservative" candidate the Republicans have had in office for POTUS was Regean.



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:21 PM
link   
reply to post by The Sword
 


please define what changed from the bush era and obama's



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by WilliamWallace
reply to post by The Sword
 


please define what changed from the bush era and obama's



The debt.



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:22 PM
link   
reply to post by WilliamWallace
 


Why should I bother? You're not getting it.

You still think that I'm an Obama supporter when I clearly stated that I'm not.



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:24 PM
link   
This is starting to get very personal. Deal with the issues and drop the personal remarks.
edit on 25-12-2011 by Byrd because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:25 PM
link   
reply to post by The Sword
 


OK fair enough i am hardheaded to a point . still of all the candidates AVAILABLE

who would you back ?



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:26 PM
link   
reply to post by WilliamWallace
 


opps posted before i saw the mod request



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:27 PM
link   
reply to post by WilliamWallace
 


I already told you. I'm not backing ANY of them.

Personal attacks aside, I don't understand why you keep trying to provoke me.



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:32 PM
link   
reply to post by The Sword
 


ok, not attempting to "provoke " anyone . just asking questions.
so any ideals what you would suggest to any candidate to help solve our common problems in America?



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


He should do it again and get Jesse Ventura to run with him.

I would vote for Ventura but I know he will never run. Either him or Kucinich.


So you would vote for him as an Independent but not as a Republican even knowing he ran as an Indy before? Are you voting for the person or the party here?



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:37 PM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


I refuse to vote Republican in any capacity.

I am concerned that Paul's affiliation with the Repubs will hurt his chances of getting anywhere near the Oval office.



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:38 PM
link   
reply to post by TinfoilTP
 


That entire website is a joke. A better name would probably be lunatics network, if you could even call it a network since it's just one guy spewing forth propaganda on our beautiful WWW, probably you OP.
edit on 25-12-2011 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:39 PM
link   
reply to post by WilliamWallace
 


Drop the partisan bull# and find a common ground with Americans?

That will never happen.

It's my opinion that the death of JFK was the beginning of the end for the U.S. I voted Nader in 2000, Kerry in 2004 and Obama in 2008. I think that's enough. I am only 30 but I have the cynicism of someone twice my age.



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:43 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 12:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


I refuse to vote Republican in any capacity.

I am concerned that Paul's affiliation with the Repubs will hurt his chances of getting anywhere near the Oval office.


ok so then if everybody votes against Republicans and not for Ron Paul then he definitely will not get in. But I do understand your viewpoint, as I would never vote for Democrats in any way shape or form, as they have been overrun with DSA members. I am sorry they have been running out the Blue Dogs.
edit on 25-12-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join