reply to post by whisperindave
Yes, the country is bankrupt. It's costs extend past it's ability to pay. In business, prolonged continuation of this = bankrupt. Bank-rupt. Your bank
of money has ruptured, and you no longer have money to pay.
The "geniuses" in charge have come up with a great idea of saying they will pay this money in promise. Which is really basically saying we made it up,
here's your ghost money.
He ALWAYS says he is right, even when he knows he is wrong. And he did remove his mike early, and he made out like she was at fault asking him some
pretty simple, straight forward questions about his rather insane ideas the Israel was at fault for 9-11, or that Blacks were going to riot and cause
race wars so people with money should move to Wyoming and arm themselves, etc. So No. No one "edited" the show to "look" like he did exactly what he
Do you think Rupert Murdoch pays attention to everything Fox News says? I don't think so. I see Ron Paul no different. His answer is sufficient to say
why he didn't pay attention. He caused a bit of a stir in the day, some people with the same economic but different social views took over his
opinion, and tried to brand it as his so they would move up the ranks. Hell, that's what Fox News is all about, am I wrong?
I admit his face is suspicious. But not lying. It's a face not wanting to admit incompetence. But like a good Christian, he admitted it soon after. We
all have our pride. Sometimes we don't want to admit we fooked up.
He clearly thought Blacks were our worst enemies until the Muslims came on the scene.
he clearly never thought either. He's the only one saying not to attack Muslims, and the only one against the primary causes of incarceration of black
You talk about faces, look at the Leno interview, when he talks about wacky bachy. He clearly is disgusted at her hatred of Muslims.
Paul is a rich congressman, who made money off of fear mongering and racial tauntings.
Rich congressmen who make money of fear mongering don't tend to pass and favor bills and legal items that would prove their own fear mongering
I mean, at least when the government double sides an argument, they actually produce materials to continue the both sides of the argument so as to
seem true at both sides. Do explain how someone can be fear mongering against blacks while simultaneously creating legal framework that would
virtually eliminate all social and economic woes of said community. Seems like a stupid idea to me.
I read some of his newsletters. They are pretty nuts. But hey, he's just an old country doctor with old country ways...Racist prick.
And you're a judgmental assumptions silly man. But I don't judge you.
edit on 25-12-2011 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)