It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2012

page: 276
159
<< 273  274  275    277  278  279 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 12 2012 @ 07:29 AM
link   
reply to post by pheonix358
 



You primarily look at quakes and volcanoes without sensing the planet as a whole


Wrong! I look at quakes, volcanoes, climate, weather, ice, moon, tides, planets, sun, solar input. Perhaps you should look at some of my earthquake pages which have all the celestial data, TEC, conjunctions etc in them. I don't have time to post about all of these but I collect data on ALL of them - gigabytes of it. There is absolutely no way you could possibly accuse me of not sensing the planet as a whole.

You should also be careful not to dismiss 'western medicine' for what you are dismissing does include the real western medicine - the herbal remedies of folklore and witches (and witches are not bad or black that is an invention of the Church and the Hellfire club.). Eastern medicine has just as many 'errors' as, shall I call it traditional, western medicine - old wife's tales that have no basis but underlying that is an holistic understanding of how we fit into nature. You do not seriously think that Eastern medicine has a monopoly on knowing what is good for us? How would western society have survived and thrived without it's own base of knowledge? Feteing Eastern medicine is just poppycock if you are a westerner, but then most have no understanding of the differences and it is so twee to be into Eastern medicine.

The 'Western' medicine you are talking about is not medicine it is designed to keep people ill for profit.




posted on Dec, 12 2012 @ 08:23 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Good! Now, can you sense the pattern!

When I look at western medicine I look at what has happened since the 1930s. Prior to that it was not as it is now! Now it is perverted!

Back to Mother Nature, Earthquakes and volcanoes are simply part of the whole. They are very natural events and yes I know you understand that. We have more data now than in any other time period that is known to us. Yet, ancient societies knew more about the stars and how mother nature works than we do now.

Every big earthquake resounds around the crust, they are not individual events, they are all connected and move in a pattern. Energy released in one location must affect the the whole of the crust.

I know you study many aspects, I respect your work. Can you see the patterns.

P



posted on Dec, 12 2012 @ 09:31 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


I linked the map of Cali to give folks an idea as to where this happened.

The close-up maps of that county would not be of any use to those unfamiliar with that coast line.



posted on Dec, 12 2012 @ 03:23 PM
link   
I looked and saw an earthquake and I think it's Oklahoma. Hmm. Oh, yes, I know there's one listed on the USGS. And it's also on CERI. So, it's not that I can't cross reference and, I think, I'm not a totally idiot, so which one is which. It shows up beautifully on FCAR (i meant HHAR) so I'm thinking Okie. (or i don't know) ( that reminds me to check ohio) And when I check Oklahoma's Geo Map, oh brother. I think i'ts listed. But is this right. 10 earthquake for today all within a kilometer or two from one another. No. yes. Why am I trying to give myself a stroke and follow those dots. I'd much rather being doing a crossword. So.

Puterman. Could you look at Oklahoma's site and are these indeed all earthquakes? Meaning. I don't know. I really wish CERI would make up their mind and list them all or none. The quake I see is 18 utc or something. I really don't want to follow Oklahoma, but, it would seem to be non-stop action and I'd like to see for myself so I don't have to look at the stupid lists. I haven't got GEE anymore and dont' want it for the moment. Is the graphs on CERI all there is?

Anyway. My shakey-senses are up and tingling. Hehehehe. Shhhh. Igore.
There's lots in the Mississippi region for today. It's a new moon and perigee just for reference. Dark out there.

I just want to note one thing. I don't go for the Dec. 21 thang. But I will say, someone will act up just to add excitement to the party. Our friend Yellowstone has been relatively quiet this year. However, recently there have been a few mini-swarms in a couple of different areas. Nothing abnormal or above normal. Expect something to talk about. Right on cue maybe?


edit on 12-12-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)


I'm glad I forgot about this... Here. some in Oklahoma believe everything under God's gaze is natural.

mediamatters.org...

www.okstate.com...


edit on 12-12-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2012 @ 06:46 PM
link   
reply to post by radpetey
 


Ah OK. I was not sure of the purpose.

Don't most people know where California is?



posted on Dec, 12 2012 @ 07:34 PM
link   
reply to post by ericblair4891
 


I gave up on Oklahoma a long time ago. The RSS feed kept on getting lost and their seismos station links don't work. None of the supposedly public seismos displays any current data at all, in fact t it is just a washout as far as data is concerned.

Looking at the area of the quakes there is evidence on the very recent imagery of pads so I guess these are fracquakes but I don't know for certain.

The array of TA seismos which are all around that area are also not giving up data nor are the three GS stations so yup it is CERI or nothing.


edit on 12/12/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 13 2012 @ 12:07 PM
link   
What's going on here?


4.9 44km SSE of Quepos, Costa Rica 2012-12-13 17:20:26 9.044°N 84.041°W 34.0
5.0 37km SSE of Quepos, Costa Rica 2012-12-13 17:16:22 9.098°N 84.066°W 37.3


Source
edit on 13-12-2012 by Anmarie96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 13 2012 @ 02:39 PM
link   
I edited the picture because the swarm isn't finished yet.







edit on 13-12-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)


Puterman, (thanks for answer re okie) get your pencil sharpened. I told you Yellowstone was going to play along for fun. They haven't listed the very last movement at Yellowstone. But, it would appear there is three regions that are showing a little life. I thought this newest stuff was right near Old Faithful but it appears to be to the westish. I really like your idea for the countdown to the end of the world. Remember to tell everyone I warned you Yellowstone was going to give you trouble. We just passed perigee or something like that.

Anmarie I think that's a double tap and it would continue the streak of lots of central activity.

I screwed up and made to posts. I'll sticke some links on the extra. One is about Chile. I wonder if it's leftovers or more in store.

Britian started fracking again. Oklahoma is overdue for something 4+ considering they had two 3's yesterday.
In one article at the comments section someone said they felt three earthquakes in one hour. I thought they may have been imagining that many. No. I checked and there were three within a one hour period in Oklahoma on the 11th.


edit on 13-12-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)

edit on 13-12-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 13 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   
0.4 2012/12/13 06:47:27 44.795N 111.009W 8.2 17 km (10 mi) NNE of West Yellowstone, MT
-0.6 2012/12/13 03:35:58 44.745N 111.152W 7.1 10 km ( 6 mi) NNW of West Yellowstone, MT
0.7 2012/12/13 03:35:55 44.366N 110.868W 3.2 38 km (24 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.9 2012/12/13 03:26:14 44.353N 110.843W 2.1 40 km (25 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.7 2012/12/12 10:04:55 44.507N 111.093W 12.8 17 km (11 mi) S of West Yellowstone, MT
0.6 2012/12/12 07:21:23 44.739N 111.159W 6.4 9 km ( 6 mi) NNW of West Yellowstone, MT
0.8 2012/12/10 21:24:57 44.779N 111.020W 8.4 15 km ( 9 mi) NNE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.8 2012/12/10 15:07:04 44.775N 111.020W 8.8 14 km ( 9 mi) NNE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.8 2012/12/10 04:08:20 44.771N 111.029W 9.3 14 km ( 8 mi) NNE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.1 2012/12/09 15:06:56 44.775N 111.023W 11.1 14 km ( 9 mi) NNE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.8 2012/12/09 14:57:16 44.779N 111.020W 9.9 15 km ( 9 mi) NNE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.6 2012/12/09 13:55:35 44.778N 111.023W 2.3 14 km ( 9 mi) NNE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.3 2012/12/09 13:43:48 44.772N 111.023W 3.5 14 km ( 9 mi) NNE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.2 2012/12/09 13:26:47 44.779N 111.022W 9.3 15 km ( 9 mi) NNE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.0 2012/12/09 12:36:33 44.777N 111.021W 9.4 14 km ( 9 mi) NNE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.1 2012/12/09 12:36:09 44.779N 111.021W 8.8 15 km ( 9 mi) NNE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.0 2012/12/09 09:34:25 44.089N 110.302W 8.4 67 km (42 mi) ENE of Alta, WY
1.4 2012/12/07 06:36:29 44.495N 110.578W 5.0 46 km (28 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.9 2012/12/07 06:36:22 44.478N 110.562W 6.3 48 km (30 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.6 2012/12/07 06:32:41 44.507N 110.580W 4.8 45 km (28 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.8 2012/12/07 06:32:19 44.486N 110.570W 6.4 47 km (29 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.5 2012/12/07 06:29:54 44.488N 110.568W 5.0 47 km (29 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.4 2012/12/07 06:17:31 44.489N 110.570W 2.4 47 km (29 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.2 2012/12/07 05:56:32 44.496N 110.583W 4.4 45 km (28 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.5 2012/12/06 20:14:15 44.826N 111.493W 9.0 36 km (22 mi) WNW of West Yellowstone, MT
2.1 2012/12/06 20:09:25 44.827N 111.490W 8.2 35 km (22 mi) WNW of West Yellowstone, MT
1.4 2012/12/06 13:52:29 44.827N 111.485W 7.7 35 km (22 mi) WNW of West Yellowstone, MT

edit on 13-12-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)


stateimpact.npr.org...

www.euractiv.com...

news.sky.com...

tv.msnbc.com...

www.calgaryherald.com...

www.youtube.com...

www.digitaljournal.com...

www.youtube.com...


edit on 13-12-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)


Had to add. 'cause someone is watching judge judy and i can overhear it so i stopped washing dishes and am fretting about ole jelly belly. me wee one watch yogi bear the other day. did you know jellystone is really yellow stone. america's oldest national park. 1872 i think.

wait, I don't agree with the local of the bunch so far. unless they post these most recent more toward West Thumb. They haven 't added any. i know they're watching. this batch as compared to the earlier bunch is more vigorous.

Do you know what killed the dinos?
It weren't no puny meteor. It was the volcano. That which has brough most of the upheaval in our history and previous.

What brought about the end of the Mayans?
Volcano.

the answer to most questions regarding pretty much everything...
volcanoes
wait, and water
ole faithful you beautiful geyser.
geezer. i'm getting to be a geezer.

edit on 13-12-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)


Yes, i make a muscle. March 1, 1872 Grant protects the area and probably then make a toast in its honor,


edit on 13-12-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 13 2012 @ 05:53 PM
link   
Boy.......this one will get the polar bears a scramblin'

earthquake.usgs.gov...

I wish I knew how to link this page in such a way, as to show it without you having to actually click onto the link.

I am such a computard!!



posted on Dec, 13 2012 @ 06:24 PM
link   
reply to post by radpetey
 


Just screen scrape and paste inside ex tags


Magnitude 5.7
Date-Time

Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 23:03:38 UTC
Friday, December 14, 2012 at 07:03:38 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 80.784°N, 121.561°E
Depth 9.8 km (6.1 miles)
Region EAST OF SEVERNAYA ZEMLYA
Distances 789 km (490 miles) NNE of Nordvik, Serbia
1530 km (950 miles) NNE of Talnakh, Russia
1547 km (961 miles) NNE of Noril'sk, Russia
1551 km (963 miles) NNE of Kayyerkan, Russia
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 14.4 km (8.9 miles); depth +/- 2.8 km (1.7 miles)
Parameters NST=513, Nph=518, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=1.14 sec, Gp= 22°,
M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=8
Source

Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usc000e9mt





posted on Dec, 13 2012 @ 07:40 PM
link   
reply to post by radpetey
 


Dude!! That far north, wow


And I am loaded with Santa jokes thanks to the northern location:
Too many cookies left out by the kids, he's heavy enough now that we recorded his footstep.
The old boy finally had a junk food induced heart attack & that was him hitting the ground.
Santa's jet engines on the revamped sleigh were a dismal failure, one can only imagine the carnage.
I could go on and on here



posted on Dec, 13 2012 @ 09:23 PM
link   
since I mentioned it on another thread, that I always feel dizzy before a bigger earthquake, I just started I log about this events.
Because I don't believe in something like this, but somehow it is strange. So since I am my biggest disbeliever, I just started to counter-check this.

So if my theory is right, there will be a next bigger one (>6 or 6.5) in the next 48 hours.
Somehow I would say east coast of honshu again, but I don't know (since even I don't belive my theory I don't want to give a prediction where it could be)



posted on Dec, 13 2012 @ 11:43 PM
link   
reply to post by aLLeKs
 


You might enjoy participating in the An Experiment in Alternative Methods of Earthquake Prediction thread. The page I'm linking via the text is the current "last" page of it, page 176.

And I see, at least via the USGS, that the Central American coast is hopping today:
5.1 35km SSE of Champerico, Guatemala 2012-12-13 23:58:51 14.012°N 91.764°W 45.9
4.2 26km SSE of Acajutla, El Salvador 2012-12-13 23:21:43 13.393°N 89.694°W 69.1
4.4 39km SSW of Champerico, Guatemala 2012-12-13 23:15:23 13.958°N 92.035°W 45.6
5.2 42km SSE of Champerico, Guatemala 2012-12-13 23:04:08 13.956°N 91.741°W 45.6
5.5 53km SSW of Acajutla, El Salvador 2012-12-13 16:26:40 13.140°N 90.004°W 13.0
4.9 44km SSE of Quepos, Costa Rica 2012-12-13 12:20:26 9.044°N 84.041°W 34.0
5.0 37km SSE of Quepos, Costa Rica 2012-12-13 12:16:22 9.098°N 84.066°W 37.3

Obviously, some are most likely aftershocks of the Champerico biggie.



posted on Dec, 14 2012 @ 04:55 AM
link   
6.4 near los angelas/calafornia. looking for details now



posted on Dec, 14 2012 @ 04:56 AM
link   
EDIS Number: EQ-20121214-292322-USA
Magnitude: 6.4
Mercalli scale: 7
Date-Time [UTC]: Friday, 14th December 2012 at 10:36 AM
Local Date/Time: Friday, December 14, 2012 at 03:36 at night at epicenter
Coordinate: 31° 7.380, 119° 36.240
Depth: 20.00 km (12.43 miles)
Hypocentrum: Shallow depth
Class: Strong
Region: North America
Country: United States
Location: 274.8 km (170.75 miles) SW of Avalon, California, United States
Source: USGS
Generated Tsunami: Not or no data
Damage: Not or no data



posted on Dec, 14 2012 @ 04:59 AM
link   
Notice! This is a computer-generated report - this event has not reviewed by a seismologist!
EDIS Number: EQ-20121214-292321-USA
Magnitude: 5.5
Mercalli scale: 6
Date-Time [UTC]: Friday, 14th December 2012 at 10:36 AM
Local Date/Time: Friday, December 14, 2012 at 03:36 at night at epicenter
Coordinate: 32° 24.810, 119° 22.332
Depth: 11.10 km (6.90 miles)
Hypocentrum: Shallow depth
Class: Moderate
Region: North America
Country: United States
Location: 142.2 km (88.36 miles) SW of Avalon, California, United States
Source: USGS
Generated Tsunami: Not or no data
Damage: Not or no data



posted on Dec, 14 2012 @ 05:14 AM
link   
Region: OFF W. COAST OF BAJA CALIFORNIA
Geographic coordinates: 31.219N, 119.551W
Magnitude: 6.4 Mwp
Depth: 10 km
Universal Time (UTC): 14 Dec 2012 10:36:01
Time near the Epicenter: 14 Dec 2012 02:36:01
Local standard time in your area: 14 Dec 2012 10:36:01

Location with respect to nearby cities:
220 km (137 miles) SSW (204 degrees) of San Clemente Is., CA (NW tip)
225 km (140 miles) S (181 degrees) of San Nicolas Is., CA
262 km (163 miles) SSW (206 degrees) of Avalon, CA
280 km (174 miles) WSW (239 degrees) of Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico


ADDITIONAL EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS
________________________________
event ID : us c000e9sl

This event has been reviewed by a seismologist at NEIC

________________________________


It looks like another one has just hit.

In fact, it looks like it's rocking pretty good at the moment


Well in the UK it took Sky News almost an hour to get a headline up about it - that literally is ALL they have though along with a more to come line!

edit on 14/12/12 by Kellys because: Spelling

edit on 14/12/12 by Kellys because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2012 @ 07:14 AM
link   
hmm this goes into my prediction diary... wow...



posted on Dec, 14 2012 @ 07:30 AM
link   
....until today I didn't knew that this thread can be so interesting and useful.

and it is.


Many things to learn from all of you about these earthly phenomena that are earthquakes.

I hope I will understand better about earthquakes by reading all the posts in this thread if and when time will be allowed.

Thank you for this thread.




top topics



 
159
<< 273  274  275    277  278  279 >>

log in

join