It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2012

page: 22
159
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 03:54 PM
link   

Magnitude ML 4.0
Region SOUTHERN GREECE
Date time 2012-01-24 21:40:29.3 UTC
Location 36.84 N ; 21.78 E
Depth 2 km
Distances 156 km S Pátrai (pop 163,360 ; local time 23:40:29.3 2012-01-24)
37 km SW Kalamáta (pop 51,108 ; local time 23:40:29.3 2012-01-24)
7 km E Methóni (pop 1,165 ; local time 23:40:29.3 2012-01-24)


EMSC




posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 02:43 AM
link   

Magnitude 5.1 Date-Time Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 08:06:35 UTC Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 09:06:35 AM at epicenter Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones Location 44.868°N, 10.470°E Depth 10.2 km (6.3 miles) Region NORTHERN ITALY Distances 13 km (8 miles) NE of Parma, Italy 75 km (46 miles) SSW of Verona, Italy 76 km (47 miles) SSE of Brescia, Italy 368 km (228 miles) NNW of ROME, Italy Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 11.3 km (7.0 miles); depth +/- 2.9 km (1.8 miles) Parameters NST=232, Nph=235, Dmin=79 km, Rmss=1.09 sec, Gp= 29°, M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=6 Source Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D) Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D) Event ID usc0007ram


USGS
edit on 25-1-2012 by herenow because: (no reason given)

edit on 25-1-2012 by herenow because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 03:23 AM
link   
Jan 25, 3:53 AM EST
Quake rattles northern Italy

hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_ITALY_QUAKE?SITE=AP
 

Quake hits northern Italy, no damage reported
Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:12am GMT

af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFTRE80O0LW20120125
 

Deutsche Presse-Agentur
Quakes rattle north-eastern Italy
Jan 25, 2012, 9:19 GMT

www.monstersandcritics.com/news/europe/news/article_1687331.php
 

Agence France-Presse
Wednesday, January 25, 2012, 10:20
Small earthquake shakes northern Italy

www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20120125/world/small-earthquake-shakes-northern-italy.403821
edit on 25-1-2012 by xecoybh because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 03:35 AM
link   
reply to post by xecoybh
 


That was expected after those foreshocks yesterday
edit on 25-1-2012 by Hellas because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 03:44 AM
link   
reply to post by xecoybh
 


Would be nice if you wouldn't tear this Thread apart. Just the links would be fine


ETA: thanks a lot, dude

edit on 25-1-2012 by Hellas because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 05:24 AM
link   
We've been watching Rainier and now Helen decides to speak up


3.4
Date-Time Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 10:51:30 UTC
Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 02:51:30 AM at epicenter

Location 46.343°N, 122.240°W
Depth 8.6 km (5.3 miles)
Region WASHINGTON
Distances 17 km (10 miles) NNW (344°) from Mount St. Helens Volcano, WA
24 km (15 miles) S (173°) from Morton, WA
28 km (17 miles) SE (138°) from Mossyrock, WA
59 km (37 miles) ENE (68°) from Longview, WA
84 km (52 miles) NNE (19°) from Vancouver, WA

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.3 km (0.2 miles); depth +/- 0.4 km (0.2 miles)
Parameters Nph= 44, Dmin=2 km, Rmss=0.16 sec, Gp= 65°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=4
Source Pacific Northwest Seismograph Network

Event ID uw60389576

link: earthquake.usgs.gov...

I guess 10 miles from Mount St. Helens isn't really the volcano itself
edit on 25-1-2012 by megabogie because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 05:28 AM
link   
This may be an opportune moment to reiterate what we have over a period of time collectively decided are the 'rools' of the thread. They are not of course hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to keep the thread 'tidy'

  1. Generally mag 6+ quakes are always reported. These may get their own thread if someone on ATS considers the earthquake warrants it, or often simply because it is 6+

    Any data posted from USGS, EMSC etc must be enclosed in ex tags and properly attributed in accordance with ATS rules. This applies to all the points below as well.

  2. Mag 5 to 5.9 earthquakes may also be reported however we ask that this is only done where the earthquake may be significant. There are many places in the world where this may be the case and it is acknowledged that in certain circumstances even a Mag 5 quake may cause fatalities.

  3. Earthquakes under Mag 5 are generally not reported as there are very few places in the world where these are significant. There are exceptions to this such as Yellowstone where a series of mag 4 quakes would indeed be significant. This also applies to other volcanic areas.

    If you feel that a particular Mag 4 is of significance then please do post it. All we ask is that you offer some reason as to why this may be of significance.

  4. Quakes related to fracking. These will probably be under mag 4. If you think a quake is related to fracking then post it and please try to pin-point the wells nearby that may give rise to this.


Nothing is set in stone. These are just quidelines.



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 05:43 AM
link   
reply to post by megabogie
 


Close enough however to cause a big signature on the MSH seismos. B202.PB..EHZ.2012.025

I don't think 10 miles is too far. There have been some other bumps recently according to the seismograms.

ETA: Here have some more
B204.PB..EHZ.2012.025
B201.PB..EHZ.2012.025 (The closest I think)


edit on 25/1/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 05:44 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Sorry Puterman, I didn't realise it wasn't actually the volcano til after I posted. I saw Mount Saint Helen's and went into alert mode. I'll be more thorough in the future.



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 05:47 AM
link   
reply to post by megabogie
 


I was not complaining I was agreeing with you. 10 miles (9.96 actually) is close enough to bear looking at.

It is a volcanic area and therefore is relevant.


edit on 25/1/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)


It even showed well on Rainier. RCS.UW..EHZ.2012.025 and STAR.UW..EHZ.2012.025


edit on 25/1/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 05:53 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Again sorry..I was responding to your guidelines for posting...didn't see your post on St Helens till afterwards. Need more coffee.



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 06:27 AM
link   
reply to post by herenow
 


We woke up to this, in my area, but it says 4.9 here, and was heard in whole North, and in Emilia is the epicenter.

I ask, could it be a foreshock?
edit on 25-1-2012 by Zagari because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 07:03 AM
link   
reply to post by Zagari
 


I believe it was 4.9 ML which may be the reason for the difference as USGS is quoting Mw. They all vary. EMSC has it at 4.9 Mw

Foreshock? No. Extremely unlikely as this quake is at the top of the high end of quakes for the area over the past 40 years. Mag 5.4 is the highest.

Mag 5 quakes

CAT YEAR MO DA ORIG TIME LAT LONG DEP MAGNITUDE IEM DTSVNWG DIST
NFO km
TF

PDE 1976 03 05 124706.60 43.65 12.39 33 5.3 mbGS ... ....... 198
PDE 1980 12 23 120103.10 44.71 9.94 10 5.0 MLTRI .D. ....... 50
PDE 1983 07 21 133122.01 45.86 11.33 29 5.1 MLGRF .F. ....... 127
PDE 1983 11 09 162951.66 44.69 10.32 36 5.2 MLROM 8C. ....... 25
PDE 1987 05 02 204353 44.82 10.72 10 5.2 MLFUR 7C. ....... 14
PDE 1989 09 13 215359.53 45.80 11.21 10 5.1 MLVIE 7F. ....... 117
PDE 1995 10 10 065422.14 44.18 10.01 10 5.3 MLVIE ... ....... 85
PDE 1996 10 15 095559.63 44.79 10.78 10 5.4 MwHRV 7FM ....... 20
PDE 1999 12 29 204236.42 46.60 10.31 10 5.3 MLGRF 5F. ....... 195
PDE 2000 05 10 165209.81 44.31 12.00 10 5.1 MwHRV ..M ....... 130
PDE 2001 11 26 005654.87 43.60 12.07 10 5.1 MLZAG .D. ....... 184
PDE 2002 11 02 105743.17 44.58 12.16 10 5.0 MLZAMG ... ....... 132
PDE 2003 04 11 092658.25 44.79 8.89 4 5.0 mbGS .C. ....... 130
PDE 2003 09 14 214251.86 44.33 11.45 10 5.3 MwHRV 7CM ....... 92
PDE 2004 11 24 225940.05 45.63 10.56 17 5.1 MwHRV .CM ....... 86
PDE 2008 12 23 152422.47 44.56 10.41 28 5.4 MwGCMT 6FM ....... 34
PDE 2008 12 23 215825 44.52 10.39 31 5.0 MwGCMT 5FM ....... 38


Source: Extracted from the link above.


edit on 25/1/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 07:29 AM
link   
Good thread and guidelines


I wanted to mention this with regards to fracking and drilling. I'll cut down the fat of this post as much as I can. Here's the YouTube link to the President's address.


NA Craton. With EQ3D, here's the past week, from 1+ mag. Not all are near sites.


edit on 25/1/12 by murkraz because: fixed youtube link



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 10:42 AM
link   
Not completely unheqrd of for a quake in this area (around a half dozen or so since 1990, if I am reading the historic seismicity map correctly), but interesting nonetheless:


Magnitude 5.2

Date-Time Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 16:04:11 UTC Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 08:04:11 AM at epicenter Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 6.465°S, 122.172°W

Depth 13 km (8.1 miles)

Region SOUTH PACIFIC OCEAN

Distances 1994 km (1239 miles) E of Hakapehi, Nuku Hiva, French Polynesia 2225 km (1382 miles) NNE of ADAMSTOWN, Pitcairn Islands 2297 km (1427 miles) NE of Rikitea, Mangareva, French Polynesia 3219 km (2000 miles) ENE of PAPEETE, Tahiti, French Polynesia

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 23 km (14.3 miles); depth +/- 5.3 km (3.3 miles)

Parameters NST=231, Nph=234, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=1.15 sec, Gp= 83°, M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=8

Source Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D) Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usc0007rer


USGS listing of fish-quake

edit on 25-1-2012 by jadedANDcynical because: typos, I am the king of them...



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 11:23 AM
link   
reply to post by jadedANDcynical
 


I was expecting that to be further south! Yea, cool. One has to wonder where they got the historical seismicity from. Obviously not the PDE catalogue.



Source



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 11:56 AM
link   
No one posted this one from last night NZDT yet?
2nd largest of 3 mag 5+ at Pusyguer Trench in Jan 2012
10th mag 5+ for NZ in Jan 2012, and still 6 days to go

Are the numbers of mag 5 quakes in the NZ region on the increase?
ABSOLUTELY



REF:3648170
LAT/LONG: -47.00503, 165.53615
UTC: 2012/1/25 6:2:26
NZDT: 2012/1/25 19:2:26
DEPTH: 26km
MAG: 5.726ML

G_L REGION: 1611
LOCATION: os E of Puysegur Trench
Reported as Felt:
Largely observed 11 Bluff [2], Colac Bay, Halfmoon Bay [2], Kingswell, Makarewa, Otatara, Riverton, Saint Clair, Scotts Gap
Weak 1MM3 Weak 13 Alexandra, Birchville, Bluff, Clifton, Gore, Invercargill [2], Orepuki, Otatara, Otautau, Richmond, Riverton, Strathern
Total 24
Energy Released: 5853.4 tonnes of TNT
map of NZ 2012 quakes above Mag 5ML with this one tagged (hopefully)
USGS =5.1Mb

edit on 25-1-2012 by muzzy because: (no reason given)


ETA: looks way bigger than 5.1Mb on LISS SNZO
unfortunately a lot of LISS stations are blank right now incl SNZO earthquake.usgs.gov...
edit on 25-1-2012 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 04:36 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


Muzzy are the usual averages for NZ still being distorted by our activity here in Canterbury?



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 10:00 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 



see the LISS is blank for all day to 16:35


I got a screenshot of LISS SNZO showing the 5.7 early when I got up in the middle of the night, will post it on my SNZO blog page later.

Good signal at IRIS ODZ


edit on 25-1-2012 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
159
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join