It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2012

page: 168
159
<< 165  166  167    169  170  171 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 04:39 AM
link   
reply to post by stanguilles7
 


In the USGS Centennial Catalogue the magnitudes for that quake are given variously as:


9.000 M GSX
9.000 Mw P&S
8.200 Ms ABE1
7.900 mB ABE1
8.200 UK G&R
8.400 UK PAS


USGS Centennial

I wonder where Oz gets 8.5?

 

By the way, where was that Mag 9? Oh yes, right in the middle of the current small swarm.





edit on 24/6/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 08:31 AM
link   
Texas, United States of America

Aka, the Lone Star State.

"And I am come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land unto a good land and a large, unto a land flowing with milk and honey; unto the place of the ..."

A land with milk and honey,
dripping and oozing money.

When I look on google, and I find the place with the quake, my eyes they go a crossed. (reread the sentence, first part with Swedish accent, second part is an Italian accent, specifically Mario of the Bros.) There's just so many drilling pads on this oil field it resembles one of those pictures made out of little pixel like dots and you can only see it when you back up. I used to look at the television and see the dots. My parents told me I'd go blind. They were lying. I see fine.

Maybe all this is some plan. It's way too hard to bulild a pipeline these days. You've seen all the fuss with the Keystone deal. And it's even hard to build a rail-line to ship the crude to the refinery. Shipping by way of water, like the Mississippi is not always easy because you can't move fast enough- all those natural twists and turns.

So, you're probably like me and think fracking is the new solution to all our energy needs. Right? Wrong.

I am so wrong. Who wants all the natural gas? Too damn hard to store. You ever see those big tanks full of liquid natural gas. They look like giant bombs. Wait, they are giant bombs. Wait til the first one goes off. It's all a ploy. The real mission is to make a giant canal. They'll frack all the way from Texas up to Alberta, Canada and the oil sands. Eventually, like maybe next week, they'll be a giant sequence of earthquake that split the continent into pieces. Afterward, you'd have a big rift that would then be widened and straighten before they let the thing fill up with water. They'll fill it with waste water from fracking. Monsanto has already developed bacteria that will keep it clean. So, stop right there, your tree hugging complaints to yourselves. With a big giant super wide canal, they'll have big super tanker like things that pull barges like trains on land. This would be an express route for the oil from Canada. There would be no bridges over it for traffic. Laws would force traffic under it through tunnels.

Heck of a plan. You got to hand to the Texans and the Americans, they're always thinking big.

I'm going to watch There Will be Blood, again. The last time I watched it, I was all like focused on characters and how they got along with their individual tragedies and struggles. Stupid me. Once again, I've over complicated something. It's simple.

Daniel = Corporations

Eli = Us


I'd post the milkshake scene. But you can find it yourself. It's graphic. I can't believe I'm Eli. I - I found a clip which cuts before the bowling pin.

www.youtube.com...

Really!? I'm an Eli. Oh my God!. It's Sunday Morning. Yikes. And I'm preaching again. The same old tired Sunday Sermon. Repeat Evil Oil Drinkers!? Repent.

Okay, in the movie you're not Eli. But you are in the Congregation.




edit on 24-6-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 10:43 AM
link   
Magnitude 5.5 - SICHUAN-YUNNAN BORDER REGION, CHINA
2012 June 24 07:59:34 UTC
earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usb000apip.php

EMSC-CSEM 5.5 mb

www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=274910


Witness location : Liangshan (China) (142 km E from epicenter)

It was very strong earthquake.And my house partly collapse.Some was died.


GFZ tensor, 5.6 Mw
geofon.gfz-potsdam.de/data/alerts/gfz2012miiw/mt.txt


2nd Ld: SW China quake leaves at least two dead, 100 injured
Updated: 2012-06-24 20:36:00
(Xinhua)
www.chinadaily.com.cn/xinhua/2012-06-24/content_6263852.html
edit on 24-6-2012 by niepcco because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 11:15 AM
link   
reply to post by SpaceJockey1
 



There has been a 'group' predicting a mega-quake of up to 8 Mag will strike this region very soon (possibly between now and July).


Minor point first. Mega quakes start officially at 8.5, but I consider 8.0 acceptable, thus anything below Mag 8 is not a mega-quake. Just terminology I know.

The mag 8+ quakes that there have been in the region, and by region I refer to Lat 49.5/Lat 55.5 and Lon 155 to 164, have occurred at ~25 year intervals. The last Mag 8+ was in 1997 based on the assumption that the Ms value of the 7.3 Ms translates to a Mag 8.2 Mw. In terms of magnitude equivalents the total Mw equivalents for December 1997 were Mag 8.27 Mw.

If the ~25 year gaps that are very clear in the data hold good then there should not be another Mag 8+ until around ~2020+/-5. Statistically the Mag 8 earthquakes have occurred at a point that represents an equivalence of 0.5 magnitude above the event magnitude so theoretically at least the current approximate stress equivalent of 8.8 could give rise to a Mag 8.3 at any time which however is less likely immediately and more likely after 2016.

The whole area will not reach Mag 9 potential until around 2040 if there are no large quakes in between.

Based on the patterns I have found i would expect there to have been a Magnitude 9 or very close to that around the 1850s. I have not looked to see if that was the case.


Keeping an eye now that a 6 Mag has struck, as it maybe a fore-shock to the big one.


I do not believe the recent Mag 6.1 has any connection to the area that produces the Mag 8+ quakes. It lies to the North East of that area and is 'round the corner' from the triple junction. I believe that was a resultant of movement on the plate boundary possibly connected to the Mag 6 in the Aleutian Islands. Of course I may be completely out of order on that.

I had to do the whole of this chart manually as I have decided to change the sawtooth charts to Mw equivalents throughout and so the programme cannot do the calcs at present. It was a pleasant afternoons work!



 

The area I selected for the chart today is based on around 860km of subduction zone around the 1952 epicentre. You can aslo see on this map today's 6.1 round the corner and the 6.0 in the Aleutian Islands.




edit on 24/6/2012 by PuterMan because: To add more "stuff" 'cos "stuff" is good.

edit on 24/6/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 01:20 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 

Interesting how for 8 years after the 1952 event there were a lot of 7's.
The opposite of what we expect (from such areas as Chile and Japan)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 01:30 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 

A worthy exercise I think.
It would have been easier if you could download the GCMT data as a CSV file, I had to manually copy and paste the date part off each entry, and type in the Mw and Ms values, I think there were 7 pages of entries for that time period.

Which raises another thing,............. DATES
Here we are complaining how the various Networks can't come up with a "standard" magnitude type, its probably a hopeless dream, they can't even standardize the dates in the same format. That makes comparisons even on a CSV file labuorious.
Here are the various date formats they use;
as an example, for the Maquarie Island quake the other day
USGS = 2012/06/22 04:31:17 (list) and 2012-06-22 04:31:17 (map)
GFZ = 2012-06-22 04:31:18
EMSC = 2012-06-22 04:31:16.0
GCMT = 201206220431A and 4:31:21.9
LDEO = 2012 6 22 4 31 20.0
GeoAu = 22 June 2012 @ 14:31:28
RAS = 2012-06-22 04:31:16.5 (list) and 22-Jun-2012 04:31:16.5 (page)

it all takes time converting to the same format on Excel, and some just won't do it (GCMT 201206220431A)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 01:30 PM
link   
Texas. (What the hell robin? you already ranted about Texas)

It ain't dun yet. What the hell really? Texas is not the earthquake capital of the world. Nor is Oklahoma. You used to able to count the amount of quakes they had in a year on your hands. Now, who can keep track. This morning is was southern Texas, now it's northern Texas. What next? East Texas?


MAP 3.5 2012/06/24 17:46:44 32.435 -97.287 4.9 6 km ( 4 mi) NE of Keene, TX
MAP 3.4 2012/06/24 08:55:58 28.398 -98.423 4.9 25 km ( 16 mi) WSW of Three Rivers, TX
MAP 2.1 2012/06/23 05:44:32 32.401 -97.246 5.0 3 km ( 2 mi) W of Alvarado, TX


The most recent is 300+ miles from the other. They're about 8 hours apart give or take. Three in the day 24 hours if you count the 2.1M.

Don't worry. They won't blow the whole thing today to make the canal. North and South Dakota are behind.
SLIDE TO SEE RIGHT SIDE FOR THE FIRST TEXAS QUAKE. Junction City Texas is a good junction to catch both them there tremors. Hope there not those big worms again..




edit on 24-6-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-6-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-6-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)


After edits. This ain't no damned coincidence. I don't care if it's 300 miles. The Oklahoma quakes were pinging off together and they were about a hundred miles or more. This is not freaking random old faults just decided to have a go at about the same time. These zones are squeezed and readjustments come in clusters.

If these things were animals I'd say the were calling to one another. Bird song back and forth. I hear it.

A litte bird told me. As the convicted man watched the technician start to open the values on the clear plastic tubes...

Wayne, the foreman had to take the controls because Eddy was sick today. Ya, sure. He thought to himself, I'm not wasting any time today, unlike these bastards I'm managment and won't get the over-time. This sucker is going to be primed and ready to go as soon as I say so. He pushed the first big red button that activate all the warning lights telling the workers the pumps were to engaged and the machine was going to rock and roll.

"Make love to her Wayne, she'll love you back long time..."
edit on 24-6-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


In my program all dates are converted to yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ss.tttZ so today becomes 2012-06-24T20:44:05.032Z

JMA, EMSC,USGS and GeoNet all get converted to this format internally.

Back to Kamchatka. I managed to find out that there was a Mag 9.0 Mw in 1734. This means the timespan between 9.0 is > 220 years and thus my extrapolation starting with 1952 and working back is wrong because I cannot assume that the resulting stress after that quake was zero especially if the previous one was 1734.

So I bunched everything up into years and worked from 1734 assuming this time that the remaining stress was 0, in other words it was exhausted at this point. Strangely it does not make a huge amount of difference.

The assumptions I have made are a ~8.5 approximately every 25 years with a few other smaller ones thrown in between these. It is of course pure guess work, but we do have 1900 to 2012 so at least there is a basis for the assumptions.

This still means a ~8.4 around 2016 to 2020 but puts the 9.0 stress point back, but only by a few years to 2056. Note that there was quite a residual after the 1952 Mag 9 if this extrapolation is anywhere near right so that may mean that the next one comes inside 100 years and not 220. There is a very interesting similarity to the Cascadia stress in this respect.



The previous chart I said that I had not allowed anything after 2012. If I extend that chart by repeating the 1997+25 years pattern we get this



That is basically just as a matter of interest as the starting point is not accurate, but you can see the pattern is still very similar.



edit on 24/6/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 03:40 PM
link   
I went for a walk. That's supposed to cool you down and help your thinking. I had to go back and look at the last Texas quake.. Instead of getting steamed, I laughed. If you look at the epicenter of the 3.6M North Texas quake, you'll notice it's right beside what I believe to be an injection site. They look a bit different than a regular fracking pad. I don't have google earth anymore. My life and computer are slowing and fading. Changing. Please post a picture because you'll see it's silly. It's so obvious what's causing this. Do we shrug? Are the people in that town shrugging?
www.star-telegram.com...




When the secondary branch of the giant crack, the Northeastern Rift, ripped across the Great Lakes , big laker ships were pushed along the tsunami waves like boogie boards, that was, until they came upon the Niagara River area. That wasn't so smooth. These were only the smaller ones that had been closer, and couldn't power through the swells. The bigger ships were fine. Fine that was, until Superior's waters made its way down the waterway staircase on its travels out to the St Lawernce and beyond.




edit on 24-6-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-6-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-6-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 06:57 PM
link   
Doublet, Azores. USGS lists one.

geofon.gfz-potsdam.de/eqinfo/list.php


2012-06-24 20:43:51 4.5 41.72°N 29.30°W 10 A Azores Islands Region
2012-06-24 20:41:08 4.5 42.53°N 28.41°W 10 A Azores Islands Region


earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_all.php

4.7 2012/06/24 20:43:48 41.388 -29.184 9.9 AZORES ISLANDS REGION



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 07:24 PM
link   
Yellowstone watchers- do it.

Click
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Won't be disappointed!



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 08:48 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


all i can say is that it was very weird. the closest seismograph at coonabarabran was maxxed out but doesnt seem to have been big enough to do so. (i felt it from gunnedah).



posted on Jun, 25 2012 @ 02:16 AM
link   
reply to post by wewillnotcomply666
 


Is that lake a natural lake,or a reservoir created by a dam?
I didn't look too close on Google Earth at the time.
Are you in drought or flood currently?
I heard on the Farming programme on the radio today that soon the World is going to have a glut of sheep on the market, due to a Aus. East coast "good season" I take that to mean lots of grass, which means lots of rain?
edit on 25-6-2012 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2012 @ 06:48 AM
link   
Tehran:21:45 , 6/24/2012
‘Earthquake threatens lives of millions in Tehran’

www.mehrnews.com/en/newsdetail.aspx?NewsID=1634271

TEHRAN, June 24 (MNA) – The deputy director of the International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology has said that a possible major earthquake threatens the lives of millions of people in Tehran Province.

“Considering the large population of Tehran and a multitude of faults (in Tehran Province)…, the danger of an earthquake is very serious… and common sense says that the possibility that a (major) earthquake may occur should be taken seriously,” Mehdi Zare said on Sunday.

AM/PA
END
MNA

© 2003-2010 Mehr News Agency



posted on Jun, 25 2012 @ 07:20 AM
link   
El Hierro burped

M3.8 Canary Islands

EMSC

Actually it looks as if it is having a swarm


Prov,Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
emsc,2012-06-25 11:15:04, 27.720, -18.059, 2.5, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 11:07:20, 28.354, -16.200, 2.9, 17.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 10:25:11, 27.568, -18.040, 2.6, 11.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 09:37:20, 27.704, -18.089, 2.5, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 09:24:56, 27.709, -18.069, 2.7, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 09:09:40, 27.708, -18.060, 2.8, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 09:03:44, 27.712, -18.062, 3.8, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 08:41:05, 27.703, -18.078, 2.9, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 08:34:16, 27.735, -18.061, 2.7, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 08:10:13, 27.728, -18.068, 2.6, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 08:03:48, 27.712, -18.071, 2.5, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 07:47:21, 27.705, -18.088, 2.5, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 07:43:09, 27.711, -18.077, 2.6, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 06:51:35, 27.710, -18.057, 2.8, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 06:47:07, 27.717, -18.066, 2.6, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 06:44:22, 27.726, -18.053, 2.6, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 06:35:48, 27.724, -18.053, 2.6, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 06:27:09, 27.717, -18.065, 3.4, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 06:14:09, 27.715, -18.057, 2.8, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 06:08:50, 27.723, -18.043, 3.2, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 06:02:32, 27.735, -18.043, 2.7, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 05:38:43, 27.717, -18.036, 2.5, 20.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 05:29:44, 27.738, -18.023, 2.6, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 05:18:13, 27.730, -18.046, 2.8, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 05:10:37, 27.716, -18.035, 2.5, 21.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 04:57:47, 27.713, -18.035, 2.5, 20.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 04:56:10, 27.747, -18.014, 2.6, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 04:48:33, 27.758, -18.034, 2.5, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 04:30:44, 27.734, -18.036, 2.6, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 04:18:47, 27.727, -18.044, 2.5, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 04:15:14, 27.731, -18.036, 2.9, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 04:08:43, 27.727, -18.033, 2.6, 19.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 03:57:20, 27.724, -18.037, 2.9, 20.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 03:35:07, 27.739, -18.032, 2.5, 18.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 02:59:48, 27.748, -18.027, 3.0, 22.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 02:40:04, 27.730, -18.027, 2.7, 22.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 02:07:00, 27.732, -18.038, 2.8, 22.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 01:56:51, 27.718, -18.021, 2.6, 20.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-25 01:48:05, 27.711, -18.041, 2.5, 20.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region
emsc,2012-06-24 21:26:01, 27.783, -18.068, 3.1, 20.0, Canary Isls. Spain Region







edit on 25/6/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2012 @ 07:33 AM
link   
reply to post by niepcco
 


Thanks for that.

I am wondering why at this time? A major earthquake always threatens lives in that area. Are they seriously expecting one?

I went to star your post and noticed you are a new ATS member so.........

Welcome to ATS and in particular to Quake Watch.

Here you will find some of the best information about earthquakes on the Internet. Why do I say that? Because the members who frequent this thread, and those who lurk and occasionally stick their heads up into the firing line on the whole produce excellent work that is based on facts.

You will find some of the alternative geophysical theories on this thread: Geophysics which is hosted by Zenius who you will also see on this thread.

Anything of a speculative nature to do with Yellowstone / Fracking / Arkansas / Bird Deaths / Hudson Bay / Life / Death / Resurrection / the Economy / Politics / Religion etc you can post on the thread hosted by Robin Marks/Eric Blair: Robinesque Ruminations

Volcano stuff you will find on Volcano Watch and last but by no means least the giant Yellowstone thread is a BIG read all about the Park that has passed page 700.

These and more ATS links, and links to many external sites you can find in my signature block and in the signatures of others.

Never be afraid to ask a question. We will always try to answer, and no one gets ridiculed here because of a lack of knowledge on what is a complex and multifaceted subject. (Well not if the question is reasonable at least!)

Exceptions to that might be mentions of HAARP or RSOE at least from my point of view!!



edit on 25/6/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2012 @ 07:51 AM
link   
Ollie: Olgie!?

Olgie: Yes, Ollie?

Ollie: What's addiction?

Olgie: It's when you can't stop using a drug even if you want to. And when you use it too much- it gives you the shakes.

Ollie: Olgie!?

Olgie: Yes, Ollie?

Ollie: What's dependence of foreign oil?

Olgie: It's the same as an addiction 'cept it's to oil. And when you are using too much it gives you earthshakes.

Ollie: Olgie!?

Olgie: Yes, Ollie?

Ollie: Is that what's causin' all these shakes here in Texas.

Olgie: Hell no!. That's different. It's tha damn Mexicans blasting tunnels under us so they can smugglin in all those drugs for us to get addicted to. Now shut up and help me unload this truck of Alcohol, Tobbaco, and Firearms here at the Waco Warehouse for wacko wares.

In the span of about 48 hours, Texas has experinced four earthquakes in three different areas many miles apart.
How can this be a coincidence? How can this not being as a result of drilling and injection?

Often here I'll go way over the top in hopes I don't bore you while I repeat the same information time and time again. The oil industry is causing earthquakes. And they will cause a major disaster. That's the simple facts laid bare. The rest is speculation. I expand on my ideas to illustrate the grand idocy of the misadventure. But when I look at the map and see how far ranging and widespread the activity in the last two days, I begin to wonder if the scale of the whold damned thing might be on a par with my more moderate ravings. I'm starting to think a series of quakes like 1811 will come. No just one faultline- felt on a wide stage. No, this will be a series. A world series of quakes. The deep south is in deep.


MAP 2.2 2012/06/25 05:59:11 31.990 -96.633 4.9 12 km ( 7 mi) WSW of Oak Valley, TX
MAP 2.7 2012/06/25 00:27:38 35.474 -92.288 3.8 12 km ( 8 mi) NNW of Quitman, AR
MAP 3.6 2012/06/24 17:46:44 32.429 -97.273 5.0 6 km ( 4 mi) WNW of Alvarado, TX
MAP 3.4 2012/06/24 08:55:58 28.398 -98.423 4.9 25 km ( 16 mi) WSW of Three Rivers, TX
MAP 2.1 2012/06/23 05:44:32 32.401 -97.246 5.0 3 km ( 2 mi) W of Alvarado, TX





edit on 25-6-2012 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2012 @ 07:58 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Thanks, no need for that intro... ed : but good on you for posting it, you never know who it is(xecoybh again)

I found and thought I'd post the short news.
edit on 25-6-2012 by utzeolo because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2012 @ 12:29 PM
link   
I don't tink I'm the only one trying to figure out how this Geonet Rapid programme works, this one started out as a 1.1ML
(see link at end for event history)

Public ID 2012p476035
Universal Time June 25 2012 at 3:09:01
NZ Standard Time Monday, June 25 2012 at 3:09:01 pm
Latitude, Longitude -28.39, -175.76
Intensity ? moderate
Focal Depth 33 km
Magnitude 5.0
Location 1240 km north-east of Whangarei
Agency WEL(GNS_Primary)
Status ? reviewed
Quality ? best
beta.geonet.org.nz...


Confirmed by Geofon as 5.5mb and USGS 5.2mb

edit:
Actually the machine is saying there were 2 of them;

Public ID 2012p476072
Universal Time June 25 2012 at 3:30:09
NZ Standard Time Monday, June 25 2012 at 3:30:09 pm
Latitude, Longitude -33.02, -177.19
Intensity ? moderate
Focal Depth 33 km
Magnitude 5.0
Location 760 km north-east of Gisborne
Agency WEL(GNS_Primary)
Type outside of network interest
Status ? reviewed
Quality ? best
beta.geonet.org.nz...


URZ.NZ.10.HH1 graph confirms 2, but the 2nd one doesn't look as big
edit on 25-6-2012 by muzzy because: oopsy,pasted the same quake twice inside the ex tags, fixed now



posted on Jun, 25 2012 @ 05:31 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


You forgot The Extinction Protocol 2012 and beyond!



rainbows
Jane



new topics

top topics



 
159
<< 165  166  167    169  170  171 >>

log in

join