It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2012

page: 139
159
<< 136  137  138    140  141  142 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:16 PM
link   
Heads up here we go again

Magnitude 6.7 (Preliminary magnitude — update expected within 15 minutes)
Date-Time

Friday, May 18, 2012 at 02:00:41 UTC
Thursday, May 17, 2012 at 09:00:41 PM at epicenter

Location 44.689°S, 80.287°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region OFF THE COAST OF AISEN, CHILE
Distances

695 km (432 miles) WSW (237°) from Puerto Montt, Chile
1493 km (928 miles) SSW (211°) from SANTIAGO, Chile

Location Uncertainty Error estimate not available
Parameters NST= 15, Nph=0, Dmin=0 km, Rmss=0 sec, Gp=256°,
M-type="moment" magnitude from initial P wave (tsuboi method) (Mi/Mwp), Version=B
Source

NOAA Pacific Tsunami Warning Center

Event ID pt12139000

earthquake.usgs.gov...

quakes.globalincidentmap.com...
edit on 4/5/2011 by dreamfox1 because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:17 PM
link   
Can't quite get that 7+ yet!

Magnitude 6.7 (Preliminary magnitude — update expected within 15 minutes)
Date-Time

Friday, May 18, 2012 at 02:00:41 UTC
Thursday, May 17, 2012 at 09:00:41 PM at epicenter

Location 44.689°S, 80.287°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region OFF THE COAST OF AISEN, CHILE
Distances

695 km (432 miles) WSW (237°) from Puerto Montt, Chile
1493 km (928 miles) SSW (211°) from SANTIAGO, Chile

Location Uncertainty Error estimate not available
Parameters NST= 15, Nph=0, Dmin=0 km, Rmss=0 sec, Gp=256°,
M-type="moment" magnitude from initial P wave (tsuboi method) (Mi/Mwp), Version=B
Source

NOAA Pacific Tsunami Warning Center

Event ID pt12139000

SOURCE
edit on 17-5-2012 by SpaceJockey1 because: Ahhh! You beat me DreamFox!



Downgraded to 6.2?
edit on 17-5-2012 by SpaceJockey1 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:27 PM
link   
And as always USGS does the oh wait dont worry


Magnitude 6.2
Date-Time

Friday, May 18, 2012 at 02:00:41 UTC
Thursday, May 17, 2012 at 09:00:41 PM at epicenter

Location 44.594°S, 80.073°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles)
Region OFF THE COAST OF AISEN, CHILE
Distances

675 km (420 miles) WSW (237°) from Puerto Montt, Chile
1475 km (916 miles) SSW (210°) from SANTIAGO, Chile

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 24.8 km (15.4 miles); depth +/- 2.8 km (1.7 miles)
Parameters NST=169, Nph=169, Dmin=891.7 km, Rmss=1.06 sec, Gp=205°,
M-type=teleseismic moment magnitude (Mw), Version=E
Source

Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usb0009sgu



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 02:53 AM
link   
This is the only Chile one that EMSC are reporting

Magnitude mb 5.2
Region OFF COAST OF AISEN, CHILE
Date time 2012-05-18 02:00:37.0 UTC
Location 44.93 S ; 80.50 W
Depth 10 km
Distances 1530 km SW Santiago (pop 4,837,295 ; local time 22:00:37.8 2012-05-17)
723 km SW Puerto montt (pop 160,054 ; local time 22:00:37.8 2012-05-17)
605 km SW Castro (pop 29,926 ; local time 22:00:37.8 2012-05-17)
Source parameters not yet reviewed by a seismologist

Rainbows
Jane



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 04:19 AM
link   
reply to post by angelchemuel
 


Just logged on. What the divil is going on? How come USGS have this Chile quake and EMSC do not? I mean 10 points difference is as good as not reporting it.

Potsdam have 6.4 Mw (revised)

geofon.gfz-potsdam.de...



Even the Chileans agree it was 6+ with a 6.3 Mw

ssn.dgf.uchile.cl...

OK I think the computer systems have thrown a wobbly. It is showing 52.mb for EMSC - which I very much doubt is correct - but their tensor page shows 4 solution (3 @ 6.4 and 1 @6.5)

www.emsc-csem.org...

It will probably sort itself out when the French have had their coffee and croissants and are ready to start work around 11 am CET so expect it to be sorted any hour now! You just cannot hurry breakfast you know.

SCARDEC 6.4 Mw

LDEO 6.3 Mw

2012 5 18 2 0 48.0 -44.75 -80.25 33.0 6.3 OFF COAST OF SOUTHERN CHILE


EMSC is overruled


edit on 18/5/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 04:56 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Maybe EMSC are more concerned about the 'mega-quake' about to hit europe....Elvis has left the building!



Rainbows
Jane

PS/Edit...Earthquake Report has this little snippet about it...seems they are more concerned about one that hit CENTRAL Japan!

earthquake-report.com...
edit on 18-5-2012 by angelchemuel because: PS



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 05:08 AM
link   
reply to post by angelchemuel
 



PS/Edit...Earthquake Report has this little snippet about it...seems they are more concerned about one that hit CENTRAL Japan!


Just a power station exploding.


Um, folks talking about central europe take a look at Santorini. Is this HT?? There does not seem to be weather enough to do this but it appears on most stations.

bbnet.gein.noa.gr...

Very deep 3.2 there yesterday
bbnet.gein.noa.gr...


It looks like weather, and that fact that it is on most of the stations probably means that it is, but it also could be HT or VT.

Looks even worse on this one and there seem to be some quakes

bbnet.gein.noa.gr...


edit on 18/5/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 05:19 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


It's all happening in Greece...infact you could say it all hinges on Greece in more ways than one!....must go finish packing my BOB!

Rainbows
Jane



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 05:36 AM
link   
reply to post by angelchemuel
 


Some more details here

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 08:18 AM
link   
Seems that EMSC have had their croisants and coffee!

Magnitude Mw 6.4
Region OFF COAST OF AISEN, CHILE
Date time 2012-05-18 02:00:38.0 UTC
Location 44.81 S ; 80.35 W
Depth 10 km
Distances 1512 km SW Santiago (pop 4,837,295 ; local time 22:00:38.7 2012-05-17)
706 km SW Puerto montt (pop 160,054 ; local time 22:00:38.7 2012-05-17)
589 km SW Castro (pop 29,926 ; local time 22:00:38.7 2012-05-17)


Source parameters reviewed by a seismologist

Rainbows
Jane



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 08:32 AM
link   
16 mins ago there was a 5.1 in Northern Algeria according to Global EQ Map



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 09:01 AM
link   
reply to post by lindsay1984
 


EMSC have is as a 4.7 mb now.

www.emsc-csem.org...

GIM are nor so good at updating.


The earlier Chile quake is now 6.4 Mw. They have had their coffee and croissants and got on with the job

www.emsc-csem.org...

 

reply to post by angelchemuel
 



Seems that EMSC have had their croisants and coffee!


Just noted your comment after I posted. Great minds and all that!


edit on 18/5/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 02:51 PM
link   
This map shows the detections for the last 14 days from Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (LDEO)
I hadn't updated for 3 days
have to keep an eye on the times as well, 2 quakes (North Indian Ocean) changed the time + 8 seconds

2012/5/15 5:19:52, 1.75, 89.25, 4.9, NORTH INDIAN OCEAN revised down from 5.0, relocated from 2.25, 89.25, +T8 seconds
2012/5/14 8:40:32, 4.25, 86.75, 4.8, NORTH INDIAN OCEAN relocated from 3.75, 86.25, + T8 seconds

edit on 18-5-2012 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 04:39 PM
link   
Lunar Celestial data for:

Papua Mag 6.0
Chile Mag 6.2

Apologies for the delay these take some time to compile manually. Must get the program on to it.



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 04:41 PM
link   
Why is it that trying to figure out eq magnitudes is like trying to figure out your credit score?



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 05:21 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 



I like this

12 ← Perigee → 16 | 26 ← Apogee → 1
27 ← New Moon → 2 | 12 ← Full Moon → 17


thats a simple way of presenting the Lunar phases in relation to the event, where did you get the arrows from? did you change the Font there?
Have you seen any correlation yet?



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 05:29 PM
link   
reply to post by amongus
 


Its worse
at least I know my credit score is a negative value

Every Network seems to have a different way of calculating Mw.
I'm using Geofons formulas for Vanuatu.
But also averaging each networks mb scores before converting to Mw.
The formula's are
Mw = 1.2690*(Ms) - 1.0436
Mw = 0.7813*(mb) + 1.5175
Mw = 0.6960*(ML) + 1.7738



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 07:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by PuterMan



Seems that EMSC have had their croisants and coffee!


Just noted your comment after I posted. Great minds and all that!


edit on 18/5/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)


...but I rather think your mind is far greater than mine when it comes to shake, rattle 'n' roll!


Rainbows
Jane



posted on May, 18 2012 @ 09:01 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


i exceeded the (stupid) maximum window of 4 hours allowed to edit my post, so I'll just go ahead and waste more space on this page to post this.

I didn't notice it when I put up the map, but all the networks missed this one that LDEO and SNZO detected



Magnitude: 4.9
Date/Time UTC: 2012/5/16 8:57:12
Lat: -13.75 Long: -111.75
Depth: 33
Location: CENTRAL EAST PACIFIC RISE
Catalog Source: Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (LDEO)


On the SNZO graph



posted on May, 19 2012 @ 03:28 AM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


To be honest I have not had a look at any correlations yet but what I am eventually going to do is come up with a table with all the data such as days before/after perigee/apogee etc. epicentral distances and some better flux data and that way it may be easier to chart and see.

The arrows are just HTML code. If you put the ampersand in front of these as the semi-colon behind you get the desired character. You can do this in an ATS post as well

uarr = ↑
darr = ↓
larr = ←
rarr = →
copy = ©
deg = °

etc. Not all lists show all the symbols, or their descriptive name which is easier to remember than the number, but this list is quite comprehensive.

 

reply to post by muzzy
 



at least I know my credit score is a negative value


I am assuming that is bad yes?

 

reply to post by angelchemuel
 



but I rather think your mind is far greater than mine when it comes to shake, rattle 'n' roll!


Probably not, just more focused to the exclusion of so much else, but thanks for the compliment.

 

reply to post by muzzy
 



i exceeded the (stupid) maximum window of 4 hours


This has been a bone of contention for so long, and I have questioned it, but they just ignore me. I don't mind what the limit is but if it is 4 hours it should be 4 and not 2 which is what it actually is unless your daylight saving time is different from the US one when you get an hour extra or an hour less. If it is 2 it should say 2.




top topics



 
159
<< 136  137  138    140  141  142 >>

log in

join