Quake Watch 2012

Just checked another of the earthquake sites and no mention of a 7.3, what the heck is going on?

quakes.globalincidentmap.com...

reply to post by DaarkSyde2012


this is odd, I use a program Earthquake monitor, since its fairly realtime'ish and the quake 7.3 has been removed, so are alot of other ones. odd i tell ya

reply to post by Cyanhide


I hope someone is saving all this stuff, I have saved a bit but was unaware things are being skewed this much.

reply to post by DaarkSyde2012

and
reply to post by Cyanhide


Who knows, those sites probably lost the feed from USGS, its not that the quakes didn't happen

Better to go to the sources anyway, if its interactive maps you like then go here
earthquake.usgs.gov...
www.emsc-csem.org...
www.ga.gov.au...

those sites you look at only show >5% of the earthquakes in New Zealand, a waste of time IMO

My home page is USGS, but thanks for the links. I have been following tectonics among other things for many years.

reply to post by DaarkSyde2012


Your post came across as if you were wondering if the 7.3 had been deleted.
Looks like you have a beef with the Global Incident map people then, why not e-mail them and ask!.
Good luck with that I've told them twice that there is no such place as Woodville County, NZ, but never got the decency of a reply and they still use Woodville County as a location for ALL NZ quakes.
Idiots

I can't help but notice, another earthquake in Iran?

They seem to be happening all of the time lately, and with all of the talks involving Iran, I can't help but feel cautious towards them. I won't mention the 4 we've had to the South near the Strait since the 5th. This one appears closer to Tehran.

Magnitude 5.1 - NORTHERN IRAN
2012 January 11 17:08:01 UTC

Depth
20.1 km (12.5 miles)
45 km (27 miles) SE of Amol, Iran
73 km (45 miles) ESE of Sari, Iran
91 km (56 miles) NW of Semnan, Iran
136 km (84 miles) ENE of TEHRAN, Iran

USGS

I notice that they aren't uncommon for the area, but still be watchful. Bad vibes.

reply to post by muzzy


I have about 3 differrent places to check, thanks. Looks like it is getting a little active again with a couple of 5s in Peru and Indonesia, according to USGS. Found another site as well for the anti-podal theory if you are interested.

www.antipodr.com...

reply to post by DaarkSyde2012


You should perhaps read the end of this post first!

Still working on a theory but would like input as to what others may think,There was a 5.0 in Ecuador yesterday and the anti podal point for that quake was...you guessed it Sumatra.

Unfortunately there is absolutely NO way that a 5.0 in Ecuador could have ANY effect the other side of the planet. Whilst it is possible that a very large earthquake may have an effect. A mag 5 is about 2 TJ of energy which may sound a lot but I would believe the theory if you could show me the 5.0 showing on a seismogram at antipodal point. By contrast a 7.3 is about 3,981 TJ of energy just to give you an idea of the difference. THAT on will show up all round the world including the antipodes.

We have looked at this before and it is not proven, but like I have said before I am happy to look at the results of a study on this over a cuppa, but I am afraid Steve Quayle just does not do it for me.

I have been following quakes for a while now and believe that the sun and moon also play into this and possibly HAARP.

Items one and two yes, HAARP? Not a cat in hells chance. Sorry I don't hold with that one but if you can satisfy the challenge go here and leave your findings.

The reason I throw HAArp into this, and this is a big stretch so please easy on the flames but if anyone is into numerology I did a quick calculation and came up with this.

The quake happened on Jan.11/2012 which breaks down to an 8, 8 is the money number and who loves money?
The elites, or TPTB, could it be possible that HAARP is responsible?: This is the part that is a ;little out there.

(Sorry could not resist)

Right so, oops, the quake happened on the 10th. Guess that does not mean 8 then. 7 maybe? Even if it was 8, I love money so does that make me one of the elite? Let me explain something to you. The elite as you call them are not elite, they are the dregs of society, a cancer that feeds on everyone else. The homeless man is more elite than these scum. If you defer to them by thinking they are elite then they are, but personally I would introduce them all to a certain French madame.

Numerology is a fascinating hobby, but that is all it is although RbJ (aka AC) may not agree with me on that.

but would like input as to what others may think

Sorry, but you did ask

By the way, just as a final point it may interest you to know that there is evidence of very large asteroid strikes having an antipodal effect I believe. Sort of like punching through the earth to lift the other side.

Edit to add

By the way also welcome to ATS and to QuakeWatch. I may bark a bit and I can be very strongly worded but don't take it to heart. For the most part you will get much input on this thread, you just have to put up with me as well.

Here you will find some of the best information about earthquakes on the Internet. Why do I say that? Because the members who frequent this thread, and those who lurk and occasionally stick their heads up into the firing line on the whole produce excellent work that is based on facts.

You will find some of the alternative geophysical theories on this thread: Geophysics which is hosted by Zenius who you will also see on this thread.

Anything of a speculative nature to do with Yellowstone / Fracking / Arkansas / Bird Deaths / Hudson Bay / Life / Death / Resurrection / the Economy / Politics / Religion etc you can post on the thread hosted by Robin Marks/Eric Blair: Robinesque Ruminations

Volcano stuff you will find on Volcano Watch and last but by no means least the giant Yellowstone thread is a BIG read all about the Park that has passed page 700.

These and more ATS links, and links to many external sites you can find in my signature block and in the signatures of others.

reply to post by Cyanhide


May I explain how USGS works?

Larger quakes are often initially added under a different ID from the one they end up with. The mag 7.3 (7.2) was issued with the ID 12010000. It was after about 15 minutes or so deleted.

It was reissued under it's current ID number.

Some systems have problems with deletions and reissues. Global Incident is one of these and maybe Earthquake Monitor is as well?

reply to post by DaarkSyde2012


I have all issues and all deletions and all revisions for USGS, EMSC and GeoNet.

Yes we are keeping track of it!

Just reporting this

4.9 2012/01/12 02:52:37 -53.279 23.494 10.4 SOUTH OF AFRICA
4.8 2012/01/12 02:24:59 -53.241 23.628 10.0 SOUTH OF AFRICA
4.9 2012/01/12 02:20:23 -53.319 23.402 10.2 SOUTH OF AFRICA

earthquake.usgs.gov...

3 EQ's in the last hour on fault between South Africa and Antarctica

Magnitude M 4.9
Region SOUTH OF AFRICA
Date time 2012-01-12 02:20:23.0 UTC
Location 53.32 S ; 23.40 E
Depth 10 km
Distances 2155 km S George (pop 174,582 ; local time 04:20:23.9 2012-01-12)
2106 km S Bredasdorp (pop 14,936 ; local time 04:20:23.9 2012-01-12)
Source parameters provided by another agency

Magnitude mb 4.8
Region SOUTH OF AFRICA
Date time 2012-01-12 02:24:59.2 UTC
Location 53.24 S ; 23.63 E
Depth 10 km
Distances 2147 km S George (pop 174,582 ; local time 04:24:59.2 2012-01-12)
2100 km S Bredasdorp (pop 14,936 ; local time 04:24:59.2 2012-01-12)
Source parameters provided by another agency


Magnitude M 4.9
Region SOUTH OF AFRICA
Date time 2012-01-12 02:52:37.0 UTC
Location 53.28 S ; 23.49 E
Depth 10 km
Distances 2151 km S George (pop 174,582 ; local time 04:52:37.9 2012-01-12)
2103 km S Bredasdorp (pop 14,936 ; local time 04:52:37.9 2012-01-12)
Source parameters provided by another agency

EMSC

Rainbows
Jane

Interesting, and the Kenai, Alaska that followed was near direct to the antipode of the map.

Magnitude 5.7 - NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
2012 January 12 03:20:49 UTC
36.994°N, 141.129°E

Depth
9 km (5.6 miles)
22 km (14 miles) ESE (112°) from Iwaki, Honshu, Japan
90 km (56 miles) NE (39°) from Mito, Honshu, Japan

USGS

EMSC have it as a 6.0

Magnitude mb 6.0
Region NEAR EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Date time 2012-01-12 03:20:52.0 UTC
Location 37.03 N ; 141.03 E
Depth 30 km
Distances 13 km E Iwaki (pop 357,309 ; local time 12:20:52.2 2012-01-12)
38 km NE Kitaibaraki (pop 50,843 ; local time 12:20:52.2 2012-01-12)


Source parameters not yet reviewed by a seismologist


rainbows
Jane

Hmmmmm 1.5hrs ago and no phase data yet from USGS
earthquake.usgs.gov...

I'd go with JMA then

5.8ML,12:20 JST 12 Jan 2012, 36.9N, 141.3E, 20 km, Fukushima-ken Oki
www.jma.go.jp...

Lots of 6's on the EMSC phase data but I see they have downgraded it to 5.9mb

Russians have Ms: 5.6 (18) Mb: 6.1 (19)
www.ceme.gsras.ru...

I think it was below 5.7 even, its hardly showing at all on LISS SNZO* certainly not in the 6 range

UK starting to have the shivers again
2012/01/11 12:00:44.9 53.041 -2.127 1 2.4 3 STOKE-ON-TRENT,STAFFS FELT STOKE-ON-TRENT
2012/01/11 05:24:43.3 54.330 -2.427 4 1.4 SEDBERGH,CUMBRIA
2012/01/10 23:13:27.7 54.131 -3.784 7 2.1 IRISH SEA 50KM SSW WHITEHAVEN
BGS

Rainbows
Jane

going down?

Magnitude mb 5.2
Region NEAR EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Date time 2012-01-12 05:37:29.0 UTC
Location 38.40 N ; 142.47 E
Depth 40 km
Distances 103 km E Ishinomaki (pop 117,233 ; local time 14:37:29.7 2012-01-12)
91 km SE Kesennuma (pop 59,116 ; local time 14:37:29.7 2012-01-12)
Source parameters not yet reviewed by a seismologist
EMSC

Rainbows
Jane

This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.
Magnitude
5.2
Date-Time
Thursday, January 12, 2012 at 05:37:29 UTC
Thursday, January 12, 2012 at 02:37:29 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location
38.322°N, 142.544°E
Depth
43.5 km (27.0 miles)
Region
NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Distances
144 km (89 miles) E of Sendai, Honshu, Japan
192 km (119 miles) ENE of Fukushima, Honshu, Japan
192 km (119 miles) E of Yamagata, Honshu, Japan
383 km (237 miles) NE of TOKYO, Japan
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 16.3 km (10.1 miles); depth +/- 9.6 km (6.0 miles)
Parameters
NST=321, Nph=322, Dmin=431.9 km, Rmss=0.66 sec, Gp= 97°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=9
Source
Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Event ID
usc0007jj5

earthquake.usgs.gov...

neic.usgs.gov...

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by diamondsmith

 

To early for this one in January ,but what date is tomorrow?

It is the 11th, but what does that have to do with the price of fish? Is there some hidden secret here I am not aware of? And why pray is this quake too early?

Just asking what date was,anyway I think that from now one the seismic activity in Japan will come to normal and those earthquakes are the sign of that.