Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Quake Watch 2012

page: 10
159
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 01:36 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Just a quick note of thanks for the info. We are so lucky to have you here on ATS!!!!! Very helpful to have such a perspective when we hear about these "big" ones.





posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 01:40 PM
link   
I just heard on the weather channel that they Haveissued a su warning. Haven't had a chance to check elsewhere.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 01:43 PM
link   
reply to post by crappiekat
 


Indonesian local warning probably. I am trying to find it. NOAA has issued a bulletin but no warning. Maybe the weather channel is getting muddles up?



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 01:43 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


That was kinda my next question ...ummm possibly a foreshock ? or was that 5.1 odd back on the 5th (emsc)
in a similar location the foreshock ?



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 01:45 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


I know we hate the foreshock/aftershock thing here, but are you putting us on warning that there is the possibility of a bigger one to come? Sounds like it to me.
Somebody posted about a tsunami warning, have you found anything yet?
nervous Rainbows
Jane



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 01:46 PM
link   
reply to post by slidingdoor
 


Well not a foreshock for another Mag 9 for sure, but yes an 8 is possible but unlikely. The pattern for the area seems to be mag 7+. There was an 8.5 in 2007 but I think it was further south. I seem to have lost my link to it. Back shortly.

Here you go 8.5 details

As I said it was further south and from memory that is the other side of a plate junction.

edit on 10/1/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 01:50 PM
link   
Tack another big quake on the graph with the full moon at it's apex.

Just sayin'



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 01:59 PM
link   
reply to post by radpetey
 


The full moon was the 8th not the 10th. Pure coincidence. What you should have said was "Tack another one on to large January quakes"

BTW relationship between the 3. Today 9.1 and 8.5. As I said, different plate area.




posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:04 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Any word on the tsunami warnings ? Great work Puterman again.January does seem to prevail the last couple of years. Very odd.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:11 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


I think that Badan servers must be overloaded. I am just getting page not found.

This is link is www.bmkg.go.id but I just tried again and get nothing.

Still nothing
edit on 10/1/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:17 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


In radpetey's defence I would like to submit my knicker elastic again!



Rainbows
Jane



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:24 PM
link   
reply to post by angelchemuel
 


muzzy has tried to find a provable connection.

I have tried to find a provable connection.

Yes there is an effect.

Does it trigger big ones? No.

To all those who think otherwise - don't just say it, prove it. Do some work, collate the data and prove to muzzy and myself that the moon causes large earthquakes - this requires the moon to be a factor in all large earthquakes. No good coming back and saying it does 25% of the time


Can't really ask fairer than that can I?

I shall be delighted to peruse the results over a cuppa.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:26 PM
link   
To early for this one in January ,but what date is tomorrow?



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:27 PM
link   
reply to post by angelchemuel
 


Angel, Knicker elastic ? Do have any pics ? Perhaps you can model them for us ?
Oh please.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:38 PM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 



To early for this one in January ,but what date is tomorrow?


It is the 11th, but what does that have to do with the price of fish? Is there some hidden secret here I am not aware of? And why pray is this quake too early?



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:48 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


I'm posting this on behalf of icemud Puterman. Very odd. Hang on I'll fix it.
edit on 10-1-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:49 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


Yer link did not work my friend.

In fact the links to HAARP in my signature are not working either.
edit on 10/1/2012 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:52 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Ok here you go Puter have a look at this.
Very strange if you ask me.I still find it hard to buy in to the whole haarp thing but the evidence just seems to mount continually does it not ?

Again I'm posting this on behalf of Icemud. Good work Icemud.


Fns for your thread Puter.
edit on 10-1-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:52 PM
link   
Moon beams. Day dreams. I love my moon. It's mine because I know how it formed.

But. Don't forget the sun.

www.digitaljournal.com...



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 02:53 PM
link   
The Tsunami Warning from the Australian Tsunami Center states that even though one is in force, it is only expected to be very low/small and only up to 100 miles from the epicentre based on previous data in similar quakes, so thank god all looks good.

Good to see you doing the Quake Watch again in 2012 Puterman you have given soo much time and information, expertise and facts against hype, its an much better resource now you are on the case after our previous ATS Quake Expert left shortly before you joined.

One of my most read Threads on ATS Thanks again for improving this resource year after year.

Kind Regards,

Elf





new topics




 
159
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join