Building Collapses from Fire in Elizabeth NJ , page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 28-12-2011 @ 11:27 PM by firelight
Did Minoru Yamasaki build it? Turns out he has an interesting track record.

Minoru Yamasaki will forever be remembered alongside America’s most profound architectural disaster. Whatever he was before 2001—which was dead, maligned, and mainly sliding away into obscurity—he is forever after the designer of the most ambitious modern structure ever to end up as a gaping hole. The World Trade Center, at this point, has been sufficiently eulogized, and the rebuilding process has brought a healthy dose of controversy to a city that seemed on pause while the wreckage was being cleared. But before closing the book on Yamasaki and his work, one last review of his career bestows upon him another spurious honor: possibly the most disastrous (and short-lived) legacy of 20th century American architecture. Yamasaki’s tale is a true American success story that not only ended in an immense tragedy, but was punctuated by numerous other disasters throughout his career. His buildings might be uninteresting, but his spectacular failures bring out the uncanny coalescence between Yamasaki’s work and the major controversies and programs of the last half-century.


n Yamasaki’s 1979 autobiography, A Life in Architecture, he admits more than anyone would care to know about his private life, but makes a glaring omission in his inventory of major projects: it was as if Pruitt-Igoe had never happened. Not a peep about it, aside from an allusion to some buildings that were “just plain bad,” but in the end acted as “forceful reminders that we must do more carefully thought-out work in succeeding commissions.” Lest we come to suspect that Yamasaki is whitewashing his career, he admits to other early failures. A building commissioned in 1951 by the Department of Defense was built without a sprinkler system, and then burned in a spectacular fire. That building, the U.S. Military Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, housed 38 million individual service records and 4,000 employees. When it was completed in 1956, the six-story concrete and aluminum behemoth was one of the twenty largest buildings in the world.

Less than twenty years later, in July 1973, a fire tore through the building, burning out of control for more than two days. It was the weekend of the official end of the draft, and the news was all bombs and impeachment. Over the previous two years, the Records Center had reported a dozen small fires, all started intentionally. This one, set shortly after midnight on July 12, appeared to be another case of arson. No one died in the blaze, set when only 50 employees were on duty, but sixteen to eighteen million military personnel files, many of them irreplaceable, were lost. Today, the Personnel Records Center informs those seeking information that, as a result of the fire, it cannot provide access to 80 percent of army files on personnel discharged between 1912 and 1960, as well as 75 percent of air force personnel discharged between 1947 and 1964. Information about hundreds of thousands of veterans vanished from the face of the earth. The building survived.


americancity.org...



reply posted on 30-12-2011 @ 09:48 AM by hooper
reply to post by ProfessorT



I've never been one to get in to a debate about what happened on 9/11....

Well then this is like being seen coming out of a brothel and saying, "well I've never been one to frequent prostitutes..."
but reading this thread to day has opened up a whole new can of worms and leaves me and I'm guessing others with more questions than answers.

Why?
There have been various famous incidents of skyscrapers catching fire and burning for hours even days and yet they didn't collapse or sustain serious structural damage however, two skyscrapers made from steel just collapse in little over an hour?

Yes, that's because your decision to label them all as "skyscrapers" does not obligate the actual structures to then act the same. Your shortcut is not their reality.
I'm not doubting for one second there was a terrorist attack....

That's good.
....but surely there must have been underground devices and extremely powerful ones at that. I guess we will never know.

Actually we do know. Its like saying, "well there were no cameras in the cockpits but I think pink unicorns were actually flying the planes - I guess we'll never know".


reply posted on 5-1-2012 @ 10:17 AM by Cassius666
Originally posted by questforevidence
Well, you know, except for this:

911research.wtc7.net...


911research.wtc7.net...



Id still want to know how they managed to light up the Bejing hotel like an effin blowtorch. What did they use for paint? Kerosin?
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 13 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 5 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 15 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 9 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 17 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 19 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags