It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by rhtverma
Unfortunately simply "believing" In Jesus is not enough and it will eventually lead you to hell. Now don't get upset with me for telling you that but it is my duty to tell you the truth. The reason its not enough to simply believe is because even the devil and his demons believe in Jesus. You need to love him with a desire to serve him and accept him into your life. Jesus Christ is the living most high God. Christianity is not just a religion; it is a relationship with God. It is a trusting in Jesus and what He did on the cross, not on what you can do for yourself. Going to church does not make you a Christian unlike what people believe. Buddha didn't rise from the dead, nor did Confucius or Zoroaster. Muhammad didn't fulfill detailed prophecy. Alexander the Great didn't raise the dead or heal the sick. And though there is far less reliable information written about them, people believed in them. Jesus is unique. He was either telling the truth, He was crazy, or He was a liar. But since everyone agrees that Jesus was a good man, how then could He be both good and crazy, or good and a liar? He had to be telling the truth. He is the only way.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by RevelationGeneration
No way is it a medieval hoax they didn't even have the technology to make such a thing back then.
I think you'd be surprised by the tricks real Alchemists had up their voluminous sleeves, back in the day.
Did you read the article? Scientists have proven that there is no way that could of created this in medieval times. Some how I don't think even the best Alchemists had high-intensity ultra violet lasers back in those days.edit on 22-12-2011 by RevelationGeneration because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by matadoor
reply to post by RevelationGeneration
" but it is my duty to tell you the truth."
Absolutely not. It is your duty to be faithful to your god, and to read scripture.
It is your God's duty to judge if that person deserves to go anywhere.
Grow up, and read your bible, and stop telling people where they will go..
Originally posted by Sparky63
reply to post by dilly1
The lack of distortion of the facial features is a problem for any theory that claims this is anything other than an artistic man-made fabrication in my humble opinion.
edit on 12/28/2011 by Sparky63 because: added comment
Originally posted by Malcher
Not seeing anything worthwhile on the fraud side.
Distortion will happen if it was wrapped around the head like a mummy. No one ever said this was the case
, in fact seems common to just raise a covering above a persons head. I guess the shroud is real people would say the image is going through the shroud as though passing through like some kind of atomic reaction.
Originally posted by Rafe_
Originally posted by Malcher
Not seeing anything worthwhile on the fraud side.
Distortion will happen if it was wrapped around the head like a mummy. No one ever said this was the case
Actually they did
, in fact seems common to just raise a covering above a persons head. I guess the shroud is real people would say the image is going through the shroud as though passing through like some kind of atomic reaction.
I pointed out more then once how that cannot produce any image even remotely ressembling the image on the shroud.
edit on 2-1-2012 by Rafe_ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by St Udio
dam-it... the scientists got punked
the shroud was created by DaVinci with a bunch of aloes & oils etc and the camera-
Obscura technology
the dude is laughing...really laughing at his creating a 'super-natura'l effect
Originally posted by Rafe_
Originally posted by Malcher
Not seeing anything worthwhile on the fraud side.
Distortion will happen if it was wrapped around the head like a mummy. No one ever said this was the case
Actually they did
, in fact seems common to just raise a covering above a persons head. I guess the shroud is real people would say the image is going through the shroud as though passing through like some kind of atomic reaction.
I pointed out more then once how that cannot produce any image even remotely ressembling the image on the shroud.
edit on 2-1-2012 by Rafe_ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Rafe_
Originally posted by Malcher
Not seeing anything worthwhile on the fraud side.
Distortion will happen if it was wrapped around the head like a mummy. No one ever said this was the case
Actually they did
, in fact seems common to just raise a covering above a persons head. I guess the shroud is real people would say the image is going through the shroud as though passing through like some kind of atomic reaction.
I pointed out more then once how that cannot produce any image even remotely ressembling the image on the shroud.
edit on 2-1-2012 by Rafe_ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sweetnlow
It was caused by a methane gas release while the body was cooking in the sun wrapped in the shroud.......end of story.
At first, I dont like it if you call me "you people". I could say the same about "you people" (the wonderous ones) but I dont. I dont need to think in boxes.
Second, why not? Whats your problem with it? See I have no problem with both theories, as they are theories.
And guess what, for me its more presumably to think that in the millions of years on the millions of stars that at least one other civilisation has evolved. More likley to believe it was tech then supernatural. Sorry.
Edit: So my explanation, it were ETs and their beam to move jesus (an ET) to their craft used UV light.
Second Edit: If you like to turn your own thread into a page long endless discussion about pro or contra, go on. If not just stop insulting other people for their different view. God would be mad at you
Originally posted by My_Reality
reply to post by RevelationGeneration
Interesting. I agree with some other posters that more research needs to be conducted by scientists around the world as to form a consistent, proven experiment. If true, however, it would provide very few possible explanations....supernatural, extraterrestrial, or forgotten technology being the only three I can think of. In any case it's curious.
The supernatural explanation stands on its own merit. The ET angle is very possible but very complicated. The forgotten technology angle is what I find the most implausible but I can't rule out the possibility. The fact that scientists proved that it could not be done in the middle ages proves only that it cannot be recreated from what we know.
"The results show that a short and intense burst of UV directional radiation can colour a linen cloth so as to reproduce many of the peculiar characteristics of the body image on the Shroud of Turin," they said.
Originally posted by trustnothing
more lies, the catholic church really dont want to let this go do they? It was proven by Oxford that it was a fake created in the middle ages, making up lies like this is the only press coverage they can get which doesn't involve child abuse.
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
Originally posted by trustnothing
more lies, the catholic church really dont want to let this go do they? It was proven by Oxford that it was a fake created in the middle ages, making up lies like this is the only press coverage they can get which doesn't involve child abuse.
This whole statement is false. Oxford proved that the part of the cloth they used was indeed from the middle ages. However, it has since been discovered, and widely accepted, that the part that they examined came from the restored part of the cloth. The shroud itself was burnt in a fire and restored in during the same time period in which cloth they used was determined to be from.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
Originally posted by trustnothing
more lies, the catholic church really dont want to let this go do they? It was proven by Oxford that it was a fake created in the middle ages, making up lies like this is the only press coverage they can get which doesn't involve child abuse.
This whole statement is false. Oxford proved that the part of the cloth they used was indeed from the middle ages. However, it has since been discovered, and widely accepted, that the part that they examined came from the restored part of the cloth. The shroud itself was burnt in a fire and restored in during the same time period in which cloth they used was determined to be from.
I saw a TV program on that topic and that whole restoration thing is far from certain. I would agree that a few samples from different parts of the shroud would have been more conclusive, but that's hardly possible.
And you know what, that's beside the point. The OP is about the significance of UV to color change in some fabrics, and again I posit that it's fairly irrelevant much less evidence for some "supernatural" feature of the shroud.
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
This is sort of off topic but it reminds me of Steven Hawking saying that if aliens came to earth they would likely want to attack it and harvest the earth for resources, or whatever. Yet, Mr. Hawking has no place to speaking about an alien's psychology. In fact, I would argue that Mr. Hawking likely isn't too adept at human psychology by saying that because the closest thing he'd have to understanding alien psychology would be human psychology.
If you ask me, I'd say if humans found life on another planet, and had the means to get there, we'd study the aliens, not attack and kill them.
The point of my original post was because the other person was dismissive of the shroud based on the original carbon dating test that they did. However, there have been, as you point out, enough questions to call the original testing into doubt. Just as this study has too many questions surrounding it to say that its valid.