It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Putting an END to the 'Ron Paul is racist' claims right here and now. Who will challenge me?

page: 27
401
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 12:53 PM
link   
reply to post by FredT
 


he did deal with it. cnn interviewed him on that same topic back in 2008.
and he's been asked that same question over and over again, ever since, including
recently.




posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 12:54 PM
link   
It really doesn't matter to Ron Paul supporters at this point. They have a fundamental understanding of his positions or the principle behind his positions. This is no different if Ron Paul was a part of an exotic religion that viewed non-believers as less human. As long as his prerogative doesn't infringe on mine




If there is one thing he could flip flop on now, why this? He's not even used to flip flopping, wouldn't it pretty hard to do if he wasn't used to it?



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 12:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Jazzyguy
 


oh yes, we must make it viral that the man was alive 20 years ago.

this is getting stupid.



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:00 PM
link   
reply to post by juveous
 


um, that video supports ron paul.
lol

this is getting verrrrrrrrrry strange. people attacking ron paul and posting videos in defense of their position that turn out to be in support of ron paul not against ron paul.

*twilight zone music kicks in*



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Freenrgy2
 


And nowhere in that video did he apologize. You said he apologized and he didn't. Maybe you better listen to it.



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by Freenrgy2
 


Look at his arrogance. That is a temper tantrum. A vote for him is a vote against The Constitution because his plan to limit The Federal's ability is to turn over said power to the states and that would then give the states the right to deny you rights guaranteed in The Constitution. See how declawing Govt would backfire.

That would make a state Govenor the right over the Federal in matters pertaining to Federal.
edit on 23-12-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)


This whole post is proof that you havent the slightest idea how the Federal gov, states rights, or the constitution operate....

You yell for constitutional rights of americans, yet you back Obama and his "Bush the 3rd" policies....

Again.......stop trolling man

Ron Paul is the only unabashed strict constitutionalist to run since god knows when......

His voting record speaks for itself, and just like on a previous thread when presented with these facts you stopped responding....

You cant address any of his so called "racist" remarks, so you turn the subject in the direction of "republicans are evil"

If you cannot successfully counter, then why even comment..........



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Henley
We all must face the fact Dr. Paul will not win the nomination. He will run on a 3rd party ticket and it will split the vote.


That is not necessarily true.
James Jaeger at the Daily Bell wrote:

Ron Paul does not even need the GOP to win the general election. If he were to walk away for a third party, he would take at least 12% of the Republican vote with him. He would also take another 15% from the Independents and at least 11% from the Democrats. This would give him 38% – enough of the vote to win the Presidency in a three-man race.



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:18 PM
link   
reply to post by undo
 


This has nothing to do with the corrupt con known as the ":Left-v-Right" paradigm so don't try and spin this into one.



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:20 PM
link   
reply to post by undo
 


When all else fails employ the classical character assassination, this proves without a shadow of doubt and will hold up to a 12 person jury panel that your claim is baseless when you have an apparent inability to hit back on facts you attack the person.

Stop being his little lapdog!



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:28 PM
link   
reply to post by ManBehindTheMask
 


I've debated The Constitution with many Constitutional scholars, have spoken to every NJ Gov going back to Tom Kean, every NY Gov going back to Mario Cuomo, have debated with a literate who's who of the Beltway Insiders Group and have heard and witnessed things that you will never know about so get off your high horse as you are an agent provocateur who brings nothing constructive here but to attack, attack, attack.

The fact remains when Borger started to drum the q in he stormed off and had a hissy fit. I personally don't want an unstable fuddy duddy without the ability to self cheque him and his emotions with the keycard access to the nuclear football.

The last real GOP'r in facts is Eisenhower, every POTUS but JFK has been trash!

I believe it was FredT last page who shot that claim to smithereens!

KABOOM, KABOOM, KABOOM!

CHEQUE AND MATE!
edit on 23-12-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:32 PM
link   
Now that there is a mountain of evidence proving this let this damn, waste of a time and space on ATS thread die!



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Now that there is a mountain of evidence proving this let this damn, waste of a time and space on ATS thread die!


IIRC. you didn't start this thread. I don't think you have the right to close it. Unless somehow you were made a MOD since your last post.



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Destinyone
 


A thread that's been shot to hell a thousand times means anything below this post is just a colossal waste of time and space!

I've been the final poster on at least 200+ threads and have got them ended only when I've knocked the wind out of the sails.

Facts speak louder then words and can we finally put this to bed so that we can talk about something else?

I'm turning the cpu over to my brother and getting cigs and will be back to this either later on tonight or sometime on the overnight and look forward to picking this up then until then enjoy your day and may you have continued success in all you do! Peace and love to you and to you a most excellent day!
edit on 23-12-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:40 PM
link   
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
 


Let it be, let it be.
Whisper words of wisdom, let it be....



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:41 PM
link   
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
 


i defend people when they are being unfairly treated. unless someone can provide referenced, original documents, regarding his supposed racism, i'm gonna sit on this like obama supporters sat on the birth certificate nonsense. i'm not entirely convinced of his position yet, but i do know when i see the crap hitting the fan, and that's what this repeatedly re-asking the guy the same inflammatory question and ignoring past answers, involves.

as far as ad hominem, i was referring to bh's position on ron paul. i agree, it was unnecessary ad hominem, just like this repeatedly asking rp the same thing is. they had their answer in 2008. would be interesting to know who did, but he's likely protecting the individual.



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:44 PM
link   
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
 


And to you...

Let it be, let it be,
Whisper words of wisdom, let it be



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by StarPeace
reply to post by eLPresidente
 


LOL see the double standard the cultist use?



Listen, why don't you stop going around the bushes here ... why don't you come out of the closet and say it out loud. You really are sitting there dying to, aren't you ...

Ron Paul, is a 'n-word' lover ... he's a jew lover ...

That's what people like you, used to call people like Ron Paul ... but, you just changed the words your using ... you say "he's a racist".

How many races are there, of man ... you tell us, weisenbutt ... HOW MANY RACES OF MAN ARE THERE?????

I'll tell you how many ... ONE, THERE IS EXACTLY ONE RACE OF MAN.

So, what's this bullcrap your spouting ... "racist" ... just use the word you are thinking ... "he's a 'n-word' lover", don't be shy ... just come out and say it.

edit on 23-12-2011 by bjarneorn because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:47 PM
link   
reply to post by undo
 







Did you really just attack BH like that for the last two pages?

Er.... why?

She hasn't said anything about RP being racist (AFAIK) but was asking who was responsible for the papers and so on?

Do people love RP (or anyone) so much that they're willing ot just talk absolute nonsense and accuse people of being... *gulps* Democrats or Marxists...??

I swear to god..


Only in America.

What a bunch of crap this thread is and what the **** is wrong with people??




posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by Destinyone
 


A thread that's been shot to hell a thousand times means anything below this post is just a colossal waste of time and space!

I've been the final poster on at least 200+ threads and have got them ended only when I've knocked the wind out of the sails.

Facts speak louder then words and can we finally put this to bed so that we can talk about something else?

I'm turning the cpu over to my brother and getting cigs and will be back to this either later on tonight or sometime on the overnight and look forward to picking this up then until then enjoy your day and may you have continued success in all you do! Peace and love to you and to you a most excellent day!
edit on 23-12-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)



Ooooh...I'm scared. guess we should start calling you thread Killer....you would like that wouldn't you,

Do you realize you just gave yourself a big old pat on the back for being KING TROLL.



posted on Dec, 23 2011 @ 01:49 PM
link   
reply to post by FredT
 



I'd never thought I'd say this to a supermod, but how about reading the actual thread before coming to assumptions. Or perhaps doing some moderating, attempting to separate fact from fiction. That would be nice.




Originally posted by eLPresidente


Wow so many people have taken a liking to the first picture I posted.

I'll let you all in on something that made me chuckle, I posted that picture on because I thought it was very similar to the picture another member posted on another thread that labeled Ron Paul a racist because he took a picture with a supposed-known-racist.

So isn't it funny how he is racist if he takes a picture with a racist but when he takes a picture with black people at his medical practice, it doesn't mean he isn't?

So which is it? are taking pictures with others indicative of that person's racial equality?


Are you all officially denouncing the picture he took with the supposed-known-racist?




new topics

top topics



 
401
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join